oa Researching task difficulty from an individual differences perspective

References

1. Ames, C.
   (1992) Classrooms: Goals, structure and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.84.3.261
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 [Google Scholar]
2. Bachman, L.
   (2002) Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19, 453–476. doi: 10.1191/0265532202lt240oa
   https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt240oa [Google Scholar]
3. Cumming, A.
   (2006) Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.15
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.15 [Google Scholar]
4. Dörnyei, Z.
   (2005) The psychology of language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dörnyei, Z. , & Kormos, J.
   (2000) The role of individual and social variables in task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300. doi: 10.1177/136216880000400305
   https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400305 [Google Scholar]
6. Elder, C. , Iwashita, N. & McNamara, T.
   (2002) Estimating the difficulty of oral proficiency tasks: What does the test-taker have to offer?Language Testing, 19, 347–368. doi: 10.1191/0265532202lt235oa
   https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt235oa [Google Scholar]
7. Elliot, A.
   (1999) Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
   https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3 [Google Scholar]
8. Ellis, R.
   (2000) Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4, 193–220. doi: 10.1177/136216880000400302
   https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400302 [Google Scholar]
9. Fletcher, M.
   (1997) Picture stories please. Hythe, Kent: Brain Friendly Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gardner, R. & Tremblay, P.
    (1994) On motivation: measurement and conceptual considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 524–527.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Iwashita, N. , McNamara, T. & Elder. C.
    (2001) Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of an information processing approach to task design. Language Learning, 21, 401–436. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00160
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00160 [Google Scholar]
12. Larsen-Freeman, D.
    (2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml029
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029 [Google Scholar]
13. Lynch, T. & MacLean, J.
    (2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 221–250.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Midgley, C.
    (2002) Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Midgley, C. , Kaplan, A. , Middleton, M. , Maehr, M. , Urdan, T. , Hicks, L. , Anderman, E. , & Roeser, R.
    (1998) The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113–131. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0965
    https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0965 [Google Scholar]
16. Ortega, L.
    (1995) The effect of planning in L2 Spanish narratives. (Research Note 15). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ortega, L.
    (2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.77–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.11.07ort
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.07ort [Google Scholar]
18. Plough, I. & Gass, S.
    (1993) Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effect on interactional structure. In G. Crookes & S. Gass , (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Skaalvik, E.
    (1997) Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71–81. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.89.1.71
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.71 [Google Scholar]
20. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Skehan, P. , & Foster, P.
    (1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00071
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071 [Google Scholar]
22. Tavakoli, P. , & Skehan, P.
    (2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis , (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.239–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.11.15tav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav [Google Scholar]