1887
Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

This study seeks to examine variations in patterns of interactivity as they are displayed in the ongoing discourse construction of high and low self-efficacy learners of Spanish in the context of computermediated-communication. The paper specifically focuses on the analysis of synchronous text chats of six university students of Spanish at intermediate level over the course of two semesters as they carried out semi-directed discussions. The analytical framework is drawn from Eggins and Slade’s (2006) model of speech functions within Systemic Functional Linguistics which, to our knowledge, has never been applied to second language online chat discussions. This approach highlights how general patterns of dominance, sustainability and dependence in the management of discourse behaviour are displayed through the participants’ contributions. The analysis suggests in particular that the realisation of interactivity can be traced back to the negotiation of exchanges concerned with social and interpersonal relations. These findings become particularly relevant when considered within the wider educational debate of participation and acquisition (Sfard, 1998), as the interpersonal relations of people who engage in collaborative activities are normally considered peripheral to second or foreign language learning (Pavlenko & Lantolf, 2000). On the basis of the present analysis, a further elaboration of the model is proposed to take account of the relational perspective that would need to be tested in future studies using similar data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.35.1.03san
2012-01-01
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bailey, K.
    (1983) Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In H. Seliger and M. Long , (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp.67–103). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bandura, A.
    (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura, A. & Schunck, D.
    (1981) Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.41.3.586
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586 [Google Scholar]
  4. Betz, N. & Hackett, G.
    (1981) The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 28, 399–410. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0167.28.5.399
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.28.5.399 [Google Scholar]
  5. Breen, M.
    (2001) Introduction, conceptualisation, affect and action in context. In M. Breen , (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning (pp.1–11). Harlow, UK: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, I. & Inouye, D.
    (1978) Learned helplessness through modeling: The role of perceived similarity in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 900–908. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.36.8.900
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.900 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chun, D. M.
    (1994) Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17–31. doi: 10.1016/0346‑251X(94)90037‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)90037-X [Google Scholar]
  8. Dewaele, J.-M.
    (2005) Investigating the psychological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: Obstacles and possibilities. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 367&380. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2005.00311.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00311.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Eggins, S. & Slade, D.
    (2006) Analysing casual conversation. London, UK: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Garrett, P. & Young, R. F.
    (2009) Theorizing affect in foreign language learning: An analysis of one learner’s responses to a communicative Portuguese Course. Modern Language Journal, 93 (2), 209–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00857.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00857.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Gass, S. & Varonis, E.
    (1986) Sex differences in non-native speaker/non-native speaker interactions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp.327–351). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Graham, S.
    (2006) A study of students' metacognitive beliefs about second language study and their impact on learning. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 296–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2006.tb02267.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02267.x [Google Scholar]
  13. International Personality Item Pool
    International Personality Item Pool (2001) A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. RetrievedMay 18, 2004, fromipip.ori.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kelm, O.
    (1996) The application of computer networking in foreign language education: Focusing on principles of second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer , (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawaii symposium. (Technical Report #12) (pp.19–28). Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kern, R.
    (1995) Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and quality of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79 (4), 457–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1995.tb05445.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Koike, D. & Hinojosa, F.
    (1998) A discourse approach to the assessment of foreign language oral Proficiency. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 3 (3), 33–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lantolf, J.
    (Ed.) (2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lantolf, J. & Ahmed, M. K.
    (1989) Psycholinguistic perspectives on interlanguage variation: A Vygotskyan analysis. In S.n Gass , C. Madden , D. Preston & L. Selinker , (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Psycholinguistic Issues (Vol. 19, pp.93–108). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Levy, M. & Stockwell, G.
    (2006) CALL dimensions. Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Martin, J. R. & White, P. R.R.
    (Eds.) (2005) The language of evaluation. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  21. McCarthy, M. & Carter, R.
    (1994) Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mills, N. & Pajares, F. & Herron, C.
    (2006) A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 276–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2006.tb02266.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Mitchell, R. & Myles, F.
    (2004) Second language learning theories (2nd ed.). London, UK: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Norton, B. & Toohey, K.
    (2001) Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35 (2), 307–322. doi: 10.2307/3587650
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587650 [Google Scholar]
  25. Pajares, F.
    (2007) Culturalising educational psychology. In F. Salili and R. Hoosain , (Eds.), Culture, motivation and learning (pp.19–42). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pajares, F. & Johnson, M. J.
    (1996) Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students: A path analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 163–175. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520‑6807(199604)33:2<163::AID‑PITS10>3.0.CO;2‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199604)33:2<163::AID-PITS10>3.0.CO;2-C [Google Scholar]
  27. Pavlenko, A. & Lantolf, J. P.
    (2000) Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Perry, R. P. , Hechter, F. J. , Menec, V. H. & Weinberg, Leah
    (1993) Enhancing achievement motivation and performance in college students: An attributional retraining perspective. Research in Higher Education, 34 (6), 687–723. doi: 10.1007/BF00992156
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992156 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pica, T.
    (1997) Second language teaching and research relationships: a North American view. Language Teaching Research, 1 (1), 48–72. doi: 10.1177/136216889700100104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100104 [Google Scholar]
  30. Schunk, D.
    (1985) Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the School, 22(2), 208–223. doi: 10.1002/1520‑6807(198504)22:2<208::AID‑PITS2310220215>3.0.CO;2‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198504)22:2<208::AID-PITS2310220215>3.0.CO;2-7 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schumann, J.
    (1998) The neurobiology of affect in language. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M.
    (1995) Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman , S. Wright & M. Johnston , (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Casual and control beliefs (pp.35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sfard, A.
    (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27 (2), 4–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X027002004
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004 [Google Scholar]
  34. Shohamy, E.
    (1994) The validity of direct versus semi-direct oral tests. Language Testing, 11(2), 99–124. doi: 10.1177/026553229401100202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229401100202 [Google Scholar]
  35. Stumpf, S. A. & Brief, A. P. & Hartman, K.
    (1989) Self-efficacy expectations and coping with careerrelated events. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 31, 91–108. doi: 10.1016/0001‑8791(87)90037‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90037-6 [Google Scholar]
  36. Thornbury, S. & Slade, D.
    (2006) Conversation: From description to pedagogy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511733123
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733123 [Google Scholar]
  37. Vogiazou, Y. , Dzbor, M. , Komzak, J. & Eisenstadt, M.
    (2003) Buddyspace: Large-scale presence for communities at work and play. RetrievedNovember 23, 2010, fromkmi.open.ac.uk/publications/pdf/kmi-03-14.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Warschauer, M.
    (1996) Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13 (2), 7–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Young, R.
    (1995) Conversational styles in language proficiency interviews. Language Learning, 45 (1), 3–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00961.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00961.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Zimmerman, B. & Schunk, D.
    (2008) Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman , (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp.1–30). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.35.1.03san
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error