oa Listening between the lines

References

1. Anderson-Hsieh, J. , Johnson, R. Koehler, K.
   (1992) The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb01043.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x [Google Scholar]
2. Barker, V. , Giles, H. , Noels, K. , Duck, J. , Hecht, M. & Clément, R.
   (2001) The English-only movement: A communication analysis of changing perceptions of language vitality. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 3–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2001.tb02870.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02870.x [Google Scholar]
3. Clarke, C. M.
   (2000) Perceptual adjustment to foreign-accented English. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 107, 28–56. doi: 10.1121/1.429245
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429245 [Google Scholar]
4. Clarke, C. M. , & Garrett, M. F.
   (2002) Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 116, 3647–3658. doi: 10.1121/1.1815131
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1815131 [Google Scholar]
5. Field, J.
   (2005) Intelligibility and the listener: the role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. doi: 10.2307/3588487
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487 [Google Scholar]
6. Flege, J. E. & Fletcher, K. L.
   (1992) Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 91(1), 370–389. doi: 10.1121/1.402780
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402780 [Google Scholar]
7. Flege, J. E. , Munro, M. J. & MacKay, I. R.
   (1995) Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134. doi: 10.1121/1.413041
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413041 [Google Scholar]
8. Gynan. S. N.
   (1985) Comprehensibility, irritation and error hierarchies. Hispanica, 68(1), 160 – 165. doi: 10.2307/341633
   https://doi.org/10.2307/341633 [Google Scholar]
9. Fayer, J. & Krasinski, E.
   (1987) Native and nonnative judgements of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37, 313–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1987.tb00573.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00573.x [Google Scholar]
10. Jenkins, J.
    (2000) The phonology of English as an international language: New models, new norms, new goals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lindemann, S.
    (2002) Listening with attitude: A model of native-speaker comprehensibility of nonnative speakers in the United States. Language in Society, 31, 419–441. doi: 10.1017/S0047404502020286
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404502020286 [Google Scholar]
12. Lindemann, S.
    (2003) Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3). 348–364. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00228
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00228 [Google Scholar]
13. Lippi-Green, R.
    (1997) English with an accent. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. McCoy, S. , Marks, Jr, P. V. , Carr, C. L. & Mbarika, V.
    (2004, January 5–8) Electronic versus paper surveys: analysis of potential psychometric biases. Paper presented at the37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2004 (HICCS’ 04) (p. 80265c). RetrievedOctober 3, 2006, fromcsdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/08/205680265c.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Morton, S. L. , Munro, M. & Derwing, T. M.
    (2005) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 111–131.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mueller, D. J.
    (1986) Measuring social attitudes: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995a) Processing time, accent, and the comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38(3), 289–306.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995b) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
19. Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M.
    (2008) Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58, 479–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00448.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00448.x [Google Scholar]
20. Pickering, L.
    (2006) Current research on intelligibility in English as lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 219–233. doi: 10.1017/S0267190506000110
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190506000110 [Google Scholar]
21. Powers, D. E. , Schedl, M. A. , Leung, S. W. & Butler, F. A.
    (1999) Validating the revised Test of Spoken English against a criterion of communicative success. Language Testing, 16(4), 399–425.
    [Google Scholar]
22. van Wijngaarden, S. , Steeneken, H. & Houtgast, T.
    (2002) Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for nonnative talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 3004–3013. doi: 10.1121/1.1512289
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1512289 [Google Scholar]
23. Zielinski, B.
    (2006) The intelligibility cocktail: An interaction between speaker and listener ingredients. Prospect, 21, 22–45.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Zielinski, B.
    (2008) The listener: No longer the silent partner in reduced intelligibility. System, 36, 69–84. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2007.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.004 [Google Scholar]