oa Review of Bednarek, M. (2010) The Language of Fictional Television: Drama a nd Identity

References

1. Goodwin, M. H. & Goodwin, C.
   (2000) Emotion within situated activity. Originally published in N. Budwig , I. C. Uzgris & J. V. Wertsch , (Eds.), Communication: An arena for development (pp.33–54). Stamford, CT: Ablex. Available fromwww.sscnet.ucla.edu/clic/cgoodwin/00emot_act.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Mittmann, B.
   (2006) With a little help from Friends (and others): Lexico-pragmatic characteristics of original and dubbed film dialogue. In C. Houswitschka , G. Knappe & A. Müller , (Eds.), Anglistentag 2005, Bamberg – Proceedings (pp.573–585). Trier: WVT.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Quaglio, P.
   (2008) Television dialogue and natural conversation: Linguistic similarities and functional differences. In A. Ädel & R. Reppen , (Eds.), Corpora and discourse. The challenges of different settings (pp.189–210). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.31.12qua
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.31.12qua [Google Scholar]
4. Quaglio, P.
   (2009) Television dialogue. The sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.36
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.36 [Google Scholar]