1887
Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Review of Bednarek, M. (2010) The Language of Fictional Television: Drama a nd Identity, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/aral.35.1.06che-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.35.1.06che
2012-01-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Goodwin, M. H. & Goodwin, C.
    (2000) Emotion within situated activity. Originally published in N. Budwig , I. C. Uzgris & J. V. Wertsch , (Eds.), Communication: An arena for development (pp.33–54). Stamford, CT: Ablex. Available fromwww.sscnet.ucla.edu/clic/cgoodwin/00emot_act.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mittmann, B.
    (2006) With a little help from Friends (and others): Lexico-pragmatic characteristics of original and dubbed film dialogue. In C. Houswitschka , G. Knappe & A. Müller , (Eds.), Anglistentag 2005, Bamberg – Proceedings (pp.573–585). Trier: WVT.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Quaglio, P.
    (2008) Television dialogue and natural conversation: Linguistic similarities and functional differences. In A. Ädel & R. Reppen , (Eds.), Corpora and discourse. The challenges of different settings (pp.189–210). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.31.12qua
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.31.12qua [Google Scholar]
  4. (2009) Television dialogue. The sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.36
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.36 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.35.1.06che
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error