1887
Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Review of Mullan, K. (2010) Expressing Opinions in French and Australian English Discourse: A Semantic and Interactional Analysis, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/aral.35.1.08moo-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.35.1.08moo
2012-01-01
2019-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brinton, L. J.
    (1996) Pragmatic markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110907582
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C.
    (1987) Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, W.
    (1993) Prosodic and functional units of language. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert , (Eds.), Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research (pp.33–43). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fischer, K.
    (2006) Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: the functional polysemy of discourse particles. In K. Fischer , (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles (1st ed.) (pp.427–448). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kärkkäinen, E.
    (1982) Epistemic stance in English conversation: a description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland Pub. Co./Elsevier Science/John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.35.1.08moo
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error