1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 35, Issue 3
  5. Article
Describing School Achievement in Asian Languages for Diverse Learner Groups
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
PDF

Abstract

This paper explores how learner background shapes learner performance on discourse features in writing by analysing data produced as part of the Student Achievement in Asian Languages Education project (Scarino et al., 2011) by Year 10 (mid-secondary school) students learning Korean as a foreign or heritage language. Five participants were in their second year of learning Korean as a foreign language at an Australian high school, whereas four Korean-speaking participants were learning their mother tongue in Saturday community schools and had varied experience of learning Korean and English, the language of mainstream schooling in Australia. Participants’ performance on two writing tasks–one independent and one integrated– is examined in terms of two assessment categories–“forms and structures” (i.e., morpho-syntax) and “discourse” (i.e., coherence and cohesion). Results reveal that participants’ performance within each group varies according to task types and that the pattern of within-group variation also differs between the two groups. It appears that the two types of learners respond differently to different types of tasks and that their learning is different in nature. It is concluded that this difference needs to be taken into consideration in teaching and assessment in languages education at the secondary school level.

© 2012 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.35.3.06kim
2012-01-01
2024-10-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.35.3.06kim
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S.
    (1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Byon, A. S.
    (2003) Language socialisation and Korean as a heritage language: A study of Hawaiian classrooms. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(3), 269–283. doi: 10.1080/07908310308666674
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310308666674 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomsky, N.
    (1986) Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Clyne, M.
    (2006) Sharing community languages: Utopian dream or realistic vision?In P. Bruthiaux , D. Atkinson , W. G. Eggington , W. Grabe & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics (pp.42–55). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, A. D.
    (1989) Attrition in the productive lexicon of two Portuguese third language speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 135–149. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100000577
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100000577 [Google Scholar]
  6. de Bot, K. & Stoessel, S.
    (2000) In search of yesterday’s words: Reactivating a long-forgotten language. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 333–353. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.3.333
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.333 [Google Scholar]
  7. Elder, C.
    (1996) The effect of language background on “foreign” language test performance: The case of Chinese, Italian, and Modern Greek. Language Learning, 46(2), 233–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1996.tb01236.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01236.x [Google Scholar]
  8. (2000) Outing the native speaker: The problem of diverse learner backgrounds in ’foreign’ language classrooms – an Australian case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13(1), 86–108. doi: 10.1080/07908310008666591
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666591 [Google Scholar]
  9. Elder, C. , Kim, H. & Knoch, U.
    (this issue). Documenting the diversity of learner achievements in Asian languages using common measures.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Hakuta, K. & D’Andrea, D.
    (1992) Some properties of bilingual maintenance and loss in Mexican background high-school students. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 72–99. doi: 10.1093/applin/13.1.72
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/13.1.72 [Google Scholar]
  11. Halmari, H.
    (2005) “I’m forgetting both”: L1 maintenance and code switching in Finnish-English language contact. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(3), 397–433. doi: 10.1177/13670069050090030601
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069050090030601 [Google Scholar]
  12. Iwashita, N.
    (this issue). Cross-linguistic influence as a factor in the written and oral production of school age learners of Japanese in Australia.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kanno, K. , Hasegawa, T. , Ikeda, K. , Ito, Y. , & Long, M.
    (2008) Prior language-learning experience and variation in the linguistic profiles of advanced English-speaking learners of JapaneseIn D. M. Brinton , O. Kagan & S. Bauckus (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp.165–180). New York: Routeldge.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, E. J.
    (2006) Heritage language maintenance by Korean-American college students. In K. Kondo-Brown (Ed.), Heritage language development: Focus on East Asian immigrants (pp.175–208). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.32.13kim
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.32.13kim [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, H.-S. H.
    (2008) Heritage and Nonheritage learners of Korean: Sentence processing differences and their pedagogical impressions. In K. Kondo-Brown (Ed.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese, and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment. New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, J.-T.
    (2001) The degree of L1 interference among heritage and non-heritage learners of Korean: Do heritage students have advantages over non-heritage students?In J. J. Ree (Ed.), The Korean language in America: Vol. 6. Papers from the Annual Conference and Teacher Training Workshop on the Teaching of Korean Language, Culture, and Literature (pp.272–283). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics (ERIC Identifier: ED466098).
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, S. H. O.
    (2005) “I know the word, but...” Korean-English late bilinguals’ vocabulary knowledge in L1 and L2. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 15–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (2007) First language attrition in a second language learning environment: The case of Korean-English late bilinguals. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim, S. H. O. & Starks, D.
    (2010) The role of fathers in language maintenance and language attrition: The case of Korean-English late bilinguals in New Zealand. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(3), 285–301. doi: 10.1080/13670050903193958
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903193958 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kondo-Brown, K.
    (2005) Differences in language skills: Heritage language learner subgroups and foreign language learners. Modern Language Learning, 89(4), 563–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2005.00330.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00330.x [Google Scholar]
  21. (2008) Issues and future agendas for Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage students. In K. Kondo-Brown & J. D. Brown (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials, and assessment (pp.17–43). New York: Lawrence Erbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, J. S. & Shin, S. J.
    (2008) Korean heritage language education in the United States: The current state, opportunities, and possibilities. Heritage Language Journal, 6(2), 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Liddicoat, A. J. , Scarino, A. , Curnow, T. J. , Kohler, M. , Scrimgeour, A. , & Morgan, A.-M.
    (2007) An investigation of the state and nature of languages in Australian schools: Report to Department of Education, Science and Training. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lo Bianco, J.
    (2005) Asian languages in Australian schools: Policy options. Melbourne Asia Policy Papers, 7, 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Montrul, S.
    (2002) Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(1), 39–68. doi: 10.1017/S1366728902000135
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902000135 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142. doi: 10.1017/S1366728904001464
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001464 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2010) Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 3–23. doi: 10.1017/S0267190510000103
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000103 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2011) Morphological errors in spanish second language learners and heritage speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 163–192. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000720
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000720 [Google Scholar]
  29. O’Grady, W. , Lee, M. , & Choo, M.
    (2001) The acquisition of relative clauses by heritage and nonheritage learners of Korean as a second language: A comparative study. Journal of Korean Language Education, 12, 283–294.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Oh, J. S. , Jun, S.-A. , Knightly, L. M. , & Au, T. K.-F.
    (2003) Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition, 86, 53–64. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00175‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00175-0 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pauwels, A.
    (2005) Maintaining the community language in Australia: Challenges and roles for families. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(2&3), 124–131. doi: 10.1080/13670050508668601
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050508668601 [Google Scholar]
  32. Scarino, A. , Elder, C. , Iwashita, N. , Kim, S. H. O. , Kohler, M. & Scrimgeour, A.
    (2011) Student achievement in Asian languages education. Part 1: Project Report. Report prepared for the Department of Education, Employment & Workplace Relations (DEEWR). Available fromwww.saale.unisa.edu.au.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Shin, S.-C.
    (2010) The current state of Korean language education in Australian schools. Carlton South, Australia: DEEWR.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Sohn, H.-M.
    (1999) The Korean language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Sohn, S.-O. S. & Merril, C.
    (2008) The Korean/English dual language program in the Los Angeles United School District. In D. M. Brinton , O. Kagan & S. Bauckus (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp.269–287). New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. White, L.
    (2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815065
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065 [Google Scholar]
  37. Yăgmur, K.
    (2004) Issues in finding the appropriate methodology in language attrition research. In M. S. Schmid , B. Köpke , M. Keijzer & L. Weilemar (Eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodology issues (pp.133–164). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.28.09yag
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.28.09yag [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.35.3.06kim
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse features; Korean as a heritage language; Korean as a second language; learner background; task familiarity

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error