1887
Volume 37, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

The significance of errors in explicating Second Language Acquisition (SLA) processes led to the growth of error analysis in the 1970s which has since maintained its prominence in English as a second/foreign language (L2) research. However, one problem with this research is errors are often taken for granted, without problematising them and their identification. Against this background, the present study aimed to: (a) measure L2 English teachers’ ability to interpret L2 learner intentions in idiosyncratic expressions, and (b) bring to light factors that facilitate error identification. Findings show that: (1) there is a significant difference between L2 students’ intentions and teachers’ interpretations of those intentions; and (2) L2 English teachers’ knowledge of students’ L1 is not an advantage in error detection. Teacher interview data were drawn on to explicate text interpretation, reconstruction and error identification, suggesting implications for L2 research and pedagogy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.37.2.03ham
2014-01-01
2019-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anson C. M.
    (2000) Response and the social construction of error. Assessing Writing, 5, 5–21. doi: 10.1016/S1075‑2935(00)00015‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-2935(00)00015-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartholomae, D.
    (1980) The study of error. College Composition and Communication, 31, 253–269. doi: 10.2307/356486
    https://doi.org/10.2307/356486 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan, A. Y. W.
    (2010) Toward a taxonomy of written errors: Investigation into the written errors of Hong Kong Cantonese ESL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 295–319. doi: 10.5054/tq.2010.219941
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.219941 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chastain, K.
    (1980) Native speaker reaction to instructor–identified student second language errors. The Modern Language Journal, 64, 210–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1980.tb05187.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1980.tb05187.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Connors, R. J. , & Lunsford, A. A.
    (1988) Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research. College Composition and Communication, 39(4), 395–409. doi: 10.2307/357695
    https://doi.org/10.2307/357695 [Google Scholar]
  6. Corder, S. P.
    (1967) The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 147–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1981) Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crompton, P.
    (2005) ‘Where’, ‘In Which’, and ‘In That’: A corpus–based approach to error analysis. RELC Journal, 36(2), 157–176. doi: 10.1177/0033688205055570
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205055570 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, R.
    (1994) The study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenbaum, S. , & Taylor, J.
    (1981) The recognition of usage errors by instructors of Freshman Composition. College Composition and Communication, 32(2), 169–174. doi: 10.2307/356690
    https://doi.org/10.2307/356690 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamid, M. O.
    (2007) Identifying second language errors: How plausible are plausible reconstructions?ELT Journal, 61(2), 107–116. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccm003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamid, M. O. , & Baldauf, R. B. Jr.
    (2013) Second language errors and features of world Englishes. World Englishes, 32(4), 476–494. doi: 10.1111/weng.12056
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12056 [Google Scholar]
  13. Khalil, A. M.
    (1985) Communicative error evaluation: native speakers’ evaluation and interpretation of written errors of Arab EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 335–351. doi: 10.2307/3586833
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586833 [Google Scholar]
  14. Nezami, A. , & Najafi, M. S.
    (2012) Common error types of Iranian learners of English. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 160–170. doi: 10.5539/elt.v5n3p160
    https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p160 [Google Scholar]
  15. Taylor, G.
    (1986) Errors and explanations. Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 144–166. doi: 10.1093/applin/7.2.144
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/7.2.144 [Google Scholar]
  16. Wall, S. V. , & Hull, G. A.
    (1990) The semantics of error: What do teachers know?In C. Anson, M. (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp.261–292). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Williams, J. M.
    (1981) The phenomenology of errors. College Composition and Communication, 32(2), 152–168. doi: 10.2307/356689
    https://doi.org/10.2307/356689 [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhu, L. , & Hamid, M. O.
    (2013) Englishes in China: Researchers’ and English teachers’ perspectives and their pedagogical implications. Journal of English as an International Language, 8(2), 67–87.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.37.2.03ham
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error