1887
Linguistic Diversity and Social Inclusion in Australia
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

This ethnographic research probes into feedback on academic writing received by Taiwanese students in Australian higher education institutions, and examines whether the feedback received helped students to participate in the written discourse of academic communities. Academic writing dominates the academic life of students in Australia and is the key measure of their academic performance. This can be problematic for international students who speak English as an additional language and who are expected to acquire academic literacies in English ‘by doing’. As a social practice, academic writing depends on participation in dialogue for students to be included in the community of academia. However, the findings show that few participants received any useful feedback. Some assignments were never returned; in other cases, the hand-written feedback was illegible, and often included only overly general comments that puzzled the participants. As a result, the learning process came to an end once the students handed in their assignments; feedback failed to promote further learning related to content, and particularly to academic writing. The article highlights the few instances where participants received helpful feedback that was accessible and constructive, and which can be considered best practice for the promotion of academic literacy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.37.3.05cha
2014-01-01
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Australian Government Department of Education
    Australian Government Department of Education (2014) International student numbers 2013. Retrieved24 July, 2014, fromhttps://aei.gov.au/research/Research-Snapshots/Documents/International%20Student%20Numbers%202013%20v2.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Butorac, D. L.
    (2011) Imagined identity, remembered self: Settlement language learning and the negotiation of gendered subjectivity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans, C.
    (2013) Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. doi: 10.3102/0034654312474350
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350 [Google Scholar]
  4. Hansen, J. G.
    (2000) Interactional conflicts among audience, purpose, and content knowledge in the acquisition of academic literacy in an EAP Course. Written Communication, 17(1), 27–52. doi: 10.1177/0741088300017001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088300017001002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Hyland, F.
    (2010) Future directions in feedback on second Language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 171–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hyland, K. , & Hyland, F.
    (Eds.) (2006) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524742
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hymes, D.
    (1996) Report from an underdeveloped country: Toward linguistic competence in the United States. Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice (pp.63–105). London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kubota, R. , & Lehner, A.
    (2004) Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 7–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Lave, J. , & Wenger, E.
    (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  10. Lea, M. R. , & Street, B. V.
    (1998) Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172. doi: 10.1080/03075079812331380364
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364 [Google Scholar]
  11. Leask, B. , & Carroll, J.
    (2011) Moving beyond ‘wishing and hoping’: internationalisation and student experiences of inclusion and engagement. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(5), 647–659. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.598454
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.598454 [Google Scholar]
  12. Leki, I.
    (2006) ‘You cannot ignore’: L2 graduate students’ response to discipline-based written feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp.266–286). Cambridge: Cambridge university press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524742.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742.016 [Google Scholar]
  13. Paltridge, T. , Mayson, S. , & Schapper, J.
    (2012) Covering the gap: Social inclusion, international students and the role of local government. Australian Universities Review, 54(2), 29–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Piller, I. , & Takahashi, K.
    (2011) Linguistic diversity and social inclusion. International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 14(4), 371–381. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2011.573062
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.573062 [Google Scholar]
  15. Roca de Larios, J. , & Murphy, L.
    (2010) Feedback in second language writing: An introduction. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), i–xv.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Storch, N.
    (2010) Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tran, L. T.
    (2009) Making visible ‘hidden’ intentions and potential choices: International students in intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9(4), 271–284. doi: 10.1080/14708470902807693
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470902807693 [Google Scholar]
  18. Vygotsky, L. S. , Hanfmann, E. , Vakar, G. , & Kozulin, A.
    (2012) Thought and language (rev. and expanded ed.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wellington, J.
    (2010) More than a matter of cognition: An exploration of affective writing problems of post-graduate students and their possible solutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 135–150. doi: 10.1080/13562511003619961
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003619961 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.37.3.05cha
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): academic writing , higher education , overseas students and writing feedback
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error