1887
Volume 38, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139

Abstract

Given the potential influence of teachers’ linguistic practice on children’s language use and gender role development, the present study seeks to examine the extent of linguistic discrimination present in teachers’ language. A total of 215 Chinese EFL teachers were invited to participate in the survey, which included a series of elicitation tests on their selection of English words for occupational titles, and the choice of generic pronouns anaphoric to people of unknown gender. The findings revealed that, while gender-biased language is still widely used, non-sexist linguistic reform has had an impact on Chinese EFL teachers, some of whom have expressed a concern with regard to avoiding sexist language. The study also found that choice of generic pronouns co-varied with such factors as semantic meaning, word structure and the gender stereotypes associated with particular occupations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.38.1.02lee
2015-01-01
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. All-China Women’s Federation
    All-China Women’s Federation (2009) Female-heavy gender imbalance of primary school teachers. RetrievedAugust 14, 2014, fromwww.womenofchina.cn/html/report/102505-1.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, R.
    (2008) Common errors and problems in English. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amare, N.
    (2007) Where is she? Gender occurrences in online grammar guides. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(2), 163–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrews, G.
    (2011) China makes unprecedented English-language push. RetrievedAugust 15, 2014, fromwww.ibj.com/blogs/10-report-from-china/post/25896-china-makes-unprecedentedenglish-language-push.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, P.
    (2010) Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English. Gender and Language, 4(1), 125–149. doi: 10.1558/genl.v4i1.125
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v4i1.125 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baranowski, M.
    (2002) Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(3), 378–397. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00193
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00193 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baron, D.
    (1986) Grammar and gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Benatar, D.
    (2005) Sexist language: Alternatives to the alternatives. Public Affairs Quarterly, 19(1), 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. , & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bodine, A.
    (1975) Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular ‘they’, sex indefinite ‘he’ and ‘he or she’. Language in Society, 4(2), 129–146. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500004607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004607 [Google Scholar]
  11. Burchfield, R.
    (1981) The spoken word: A BBC guide. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carter, A.
    (1980) The language of the sisterhood. In L. Michaels & C. Ricks (Eds.), The state of the language (pp.226–234). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Choi, P. K.
    (2012) 香港性別平等教育狀況考察 (A study of gender equity in Hong Kong education). In P. K. Choi & K. W. Chan (Eds.), Gender perspectives in education: Empirical research into schooling processes (pp.179–192). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. CNTV
    CNTV (2013) Male nurses needed in Chinese job market. RetrievedJuly 7, 2015, fromenglish.cntv.cn/20130512/104623.shtml.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cochran, E. P.
    (1996) Gender and the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 159–162. doi: 10.2307/3587612
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587612 [Google Scholar]
  16. Commercial Radio Australia
    Commercial Radio Australia (2004) Codes of practice and guidelines. RetrievedAugust 14, 2014, fromwww.acma.gov.au/webwr/aba/contentreg/codes/radio/documents/cra-codeofpractice.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cronin, C. , & Jreisat, S.
    (1995) Effects of modeling on the use of nonsexist language among high school freshpersons and seniors. Sex Roles, 33(11–12), 819–830. doi: 10.1007/BF01544781
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544781 [Google Scholar]
  18. Crystal, D.
    (2003) English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486999
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486999 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2006) How language works: How babies babble, words change meaning, and languages live or die. Woodstock, N.Y.: Overlook Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eckert, P. , & McConnell-Ginet, S.
    (2003) Language and gender. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791147 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ettner, C.
    (2002) In Chinese, men and women are equal – or – women and men are equal?In M. Hellinger & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (vol.2) (pp.29–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.10.07ett
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.10.07ett [Google Scholar]
  22. Fowler, H. W.
    (1965) A dictionary of modern English usage (rev. ed. by Sir Ernes Gowers ). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fromkin, V. , Rodman, R. , & Hyams, N.
    (2014) An introduction to language. Boston, Mass.: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Geng, J.
    (2007) Removal of toxic English teaching and learning styles in China. US-China Education Review, 4(5), 42–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibbon, M.
    (1999) Feminist perspectives on language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. He, D. , & Zhang, Q.
    (2010) Native speaker norms and China English: From the perspective of learners and teachers in China. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 769–789. doi: 10.5054/tq.2010.235995
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.235995 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hellinger, M.
    (2001) English – Gender in a global language. In M. Hellinger & H. Bußmann (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (Vol. 1) (pp.105–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.9.09hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.9.09hel [Google Scholar]
  28. Henley, N. M.
    (1989) Molehill or mountain? What we know and don’t know about sex bias in language. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspective (pp.59–78). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑3588‑0_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3588-0_4 [Google Scholar]
  29. Holmes, J. , Sigley, R. J. , & Terraschke, A.
    (2009) From chairman to chairwoman to chairperson: Exploring the move from sexist usages to gender neutrality. In P. Peters , P. Collins & A. Smith (Eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and beyond (pp.183–204). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g39.11hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g39.11hol [Google Scholar]
  30. Jacobs, G. M. , Zhuo, Q. Y. , Jocson, P. C. , Ong, C. W. , & Austria, M. E. D.
    (1996) Asian secondlanguage educationists’ views of gender-inclusive English. TEFLIN Journal, 8, 86–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jochnowitz, G.
    (1982) Everybody likes pizza, doesn’t he or she?American Speech, 57(3), 198–203. doi: 10.2307/454860
    https://doi.org/10.2307/454860 [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnson, K.
    (1996) The politics of the revival of infant abandonment in China, with special reference to Hunan. Population and Development Review, 22(1), 77–98. doi: 10.2307/2137687
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2137687 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kingston, A. J. , & Lovelace, T. L.
    (1977) Guidelines for authors: A new form of censorship?Journal of Literacy Research, 9(1), 89–93. doi: 10.1080/10862967709547209
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967709547209 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lakoff, R.
    (1975) Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, F. K. J.
    (1999) Acceptability and usage in Australian English and Hong Kong English. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee, J. F. K.
    (2001) Attitudes towards debatable usages among English language teachers and students. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2007) Acceptability of sexist language among young people in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 56(5–6), 285–295. doi: 10.1007/s11199‑006‑9170‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9170-4 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2009) Perceptions of ELT among English language teachers in China. Education Journal, 37(1–2), 137–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, J. F. K. , & Collins, P.
    (2006) Linguistic acceptability in Hong Kong English. Asian Englishes, 9(1), 24–40. doi: 10.1080/13488678.2006.10801175
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2006.10801175 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2009) Australian English-language textbooks: The gender issues. Gender and Education, 21(4), 353–370. doi: 10.1080/09540250802392257
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802392257 [Google Scholar]
  41. Martyna, W.
    (1978) What does ‘he’ mean? Use of the generic masculine. Journal of Communication, 28(1), 130–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1978.tb01576.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01576.x [Google Scholar]
  42. McCormick, T. M.
    (1994) Creating the nonsexist classroom: A multicultural approach. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Miller, C. , & Swift, K.
    (1976) Words and women. New York: Anchor Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mills, S.
    (2008) Language and sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511755033
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755033 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mills, S. , & Mullany, L.
    (2011) Language, gender and feminism: Theory, methodology and practice. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Mittins, W. H. , Salu, M. , Edminson, M. , & Coyne, S.
    (1970) Attitudes to English usage. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Nilsen, A. P.
    (1987) Guidelines against sexist language: A case history. In J. Penfield (Ed.), Women and language in transition (pp.37–64). Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (2001) Why keep searching when it’s already “their”? Reconsidering “everybody’s” pronoun problem. English Journal, 90(4), 68–73. doi: 10.2307/821905
    https://doi.org/10.2307/821905 [Google Scholar]
  49. Partridge, E.
    (1965) Usage and abusage. London: Hamish Hamilton.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Pauwels, A.
    (1997) Of handymen and waitpersons: A linguistic evaluation of job classifieds. Australian Journal of Communication, 24(1), 58–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (1998) Women changing language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2000) Does language reform lead to linguistic change?Australian Language Matters, 8(1), 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2001) Non-sexist language reform and generic pronouns in Australian English. English World-Wide, 22(1), 105–119. doi: 10.1075/eww.22.1.06pau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.22.1.06pau [Google Scholar]
  54. Pauwels, A. , & Winter, J.
    (2004) Generic pronouns and gender-inclusive language reform in the English of Singapore and the Philippines. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 50–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2006) Gender inclusivity or ‘grammar rules OK’? Linguistic prescriptivism vs linguistic discrimination in the classroom. Language and Education, 20(2), 128–140. doi: 10.1080/09500780608668717
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780608668717 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pauwels, A. , & Wrightson-Turcotte, K.
    (2001) Pronoun choice and feminist language change in the Australian media. Australian Journal of Communication, 28(1), 69–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Peters, P.
    (2004) The Cambridge guide to English usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511487040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487040 [Google Scholar]
  58. Poynton, C.
    (1989) Language and gender: Making the difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Rainer Dangel, J. , & Durden, T. R.
    (2010) The nature of teacher talk during small group activities. Young children, 65(1), 74–78, 80–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Ravitch, D.
    (2003) The language police: How pressure groups restrict what students learn. New York: Knopf.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Sadker, D. M. , & Silber, E. S.
    (2007) Gender in the classroom: Foundations, skills, methods, and strategies across the curriculum. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Schneider, J. W. , & Hacker, S. L.
    (1973) Sex role imagery and use of the generic ‘man’ in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Shaffer, M. A. , Joplin, J. R. W. , Bell, M. P. , Lau, T. , & Oguz, C.
    (2000) Gender discrimination and jobrelated outcomes: A cross-cultural comparison of working women in the United States and China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 395–427. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1748
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1748 [Google Scholar]
  64. Shan, X.
    (2002) Guangdong badly in need of male nurses. RetrievedAugust 14, 2014, fromwww.china.org.cn/english/2002/Jul/36562.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Shaw, S. , & Hoeber, L.
    (2003) ‘A strong man is direct and a direct woman is a bitch’: Gendered discourses and their influence on employment roles in sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 17(4), 347–375. doi: 10.1123/jsm.17.4.347
    https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.17.4.347 [Google Scholar]
  66. Snooks & Co.
    Snooks & Co. (2002) Style manual for authors, editors and printers. Canberra: John Wiley – Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Spender, D.
    (1980) Man made language. London: Routledge – Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Sunderland, J. , Cowley, M. , Abdul Rahim, F. , Leontzakou, C. , & Shattuck, J.
    (2000) From bias ‘in the text’ to ‘teacher talk around the text’: An exploration of teacher discourse and gendered foreign language textbook texts. Linguistics and Education, 11(3), 251–286. doi: 10.1016/S0898‑5898(00)00034‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00034-6 [Google Scholar]
  69. Swan, M.
    (2005) Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Swim, J. K. , Mallett, R. , & Stangor, C.
    (2004) Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 51(3–4), 117–128. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000037757.73192.06
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037757.73192.06 [Google Scholar]
  71. Tao, B.
    (2007) Research into sexism in language testing and its implications to language testing in China. Paper presented atthe International Conference on Language Testing, China.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Wang, Y.
    (2010) 從 從 ‘ta’ 看 ‘他’ 與 ‘她’ (A study of ‘他’ and ‘她’ through ‘ta’). 《大 眾 文 藝》6, 78.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Winter, J. , & Pauwels, A.
    (2006) Men staying at home looking after their children: Feminist linguistic reform and social change. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 16–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2006.00104.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00104.x [Google Scholar]
  74. Yu, T.
    (2010) Businesswomen show mettle in man’s world. China Daily. RetrievedAugust 14, 2014, fromwww.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2010-05/24/content_9883497.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Yu, W. M. , et al.
    (2012) 香港教師培訓課程中的性別教育元素初探 (Gender education in Hong Kong teacher training programs: A preliminary study). In P. K. Choi & K. W. Chan (Eds.), Gender perspectives in education: Empirical research into schooling processes (pp.135–148). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhao, H.
    (2011) Gender construction and negotiation in the Chinese EFL classroom. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.38.1.02lee
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): China , gender , generic pronoun , occupational title and sexism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error