The role of L2 learner goal differences in task-generated oral production

References

1. Ames, C
   (1992) Classrooms: Goals, structure and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.84.3.261
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 [Google Scholar]
2. Ben Maad, M.R
   (2010) Holistic and analytic processing modes in non-native learners’ performance of narrative tasks. System, 38(4), 591–602. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.09.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.09.013 [Google Scholar]
3. Ben Maad, M.R
   (2012) Towards a discerning image of learners’ estimation of task difficulty and motivation: Goal orientations highlighted. Asian EFL Journal, 14(3), 40–61.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bygate, M
   (2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In: M. Bygate , P. Skehan , & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp.23–48). Harlow: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cumming, A
   (2006) Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.15
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.15 [Google Scholar]
6. Dörnyei, Z
   (2005) The psychology of language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dörnyei, Z. , & Kormos, J
   (2000) The role of individual and social variables in task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300. doi: 10.1191/136216800125096
   https://doi.org/10.1191/136216800125096 [Google Scholar]
8. Dörnyei, Z. , & Skehan, P
   (2003) Individual differences in second language learning. In: C. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.589–63). Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch18
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch18 [Google Scholar]
9. Ellis, R
   (2000) Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193–220. doi: 10.1191/136216800125069
   https://doi.org/10.1191/136216800125069 [Google Scholar]
10. Ellis, R
    (2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ellis, R
    (2009) The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 474–509. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042 [Google Scholar]
12. Ellis, R. , & Barkhuizen, B
    (2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ferrari, S
    (2012) A longitudinal study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency variation in second language development. In: A. Housen , F. Kuiken , & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp.277–297). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.32.12fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.12fer [Google Scholar]
14. Foster, P. , & Skehan, P
    (1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100015047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047 [Google Scholar]
15. Foster, P. , Tonkyn, A. , & Wigglesworth, G
    (2000) Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.3.354
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 [Google Scholar]
16. Gass, S. , Mackey, A. , Alvarez-Torres, M.J. , & Fernandez-Garcia, M
    (1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00102
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00102 [Google Scholar]
17. He, T
    (2005) Effects of mastery and performance goals on the composition strategy use of adult EFL writers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(4), 407–431. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.61.3.407
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.3.407 [Google Scholar]
18. Housen, A. , Kuiken, F. , & Vedder, I
    (2012) Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.32
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32 [Google Scholar]
19. Iwashita, N. , McNamara, T. , & Elder, C
    (2001) Can we predict task difficulty in an oral proficiency test? Exploring the potential of an information processes approach to task design. Language Learning, 21(3), 401–436. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00160
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00160 [Google Scholar]
20. Kawauchi, C
    (2005) The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In: R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.143–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.11.09kaw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.09kaw [Google Scholar]
21. Kim, Y. , & Tracy-Ventura, N
    (2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41(3), 829–840. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005 [Google Scholar]
22. Kormos, J
    (1999) Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49(2), 303–342. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00090
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00090 [Google Scholar]
23. Kormos, J
    (2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kuiken, F. , Mos, M. , & Vedder, I
    (2005) Cognitive task complexity and second language writing performance. In: S. Foster-Cohen & P. García-Mayo (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook (pp.195–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Larsen-Freeman, D
    (2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml029
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029 [Google Scholar]
26. Levkina, M. , & Gilabert, Y
    (2012) The effects of cognitive task complexity on L2 oral production. In: A. Housen , F. Kiuken , & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency investigating complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp.171–198). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.32.08lev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.08lev [Google Scholar]
27. Mackey, A. , & Gass, S
    (2005) Second language research methodology and design. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McLaughlin, B
    (1990) Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 113–128. doi: 10.1093/applin/11.2.113
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.113 [Google Scholar]
29. Myles, F
    (2012) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency: The role played by formulaic sequences in early interlanguage development. In: A. Housen , F. Kuiken , & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp.71–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.32.04myl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.04myl [Google Scholar]
30. Ortega, L
    (1999) Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), 109–148. doi: 10.1017/S0272263199001047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199001047 [Google Scholar]
31. Ortega, L
    (2005) What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In: R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.77–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.11.07ort
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.07ort [Google Scholar]
32. Raupach, M
    (1984) Formulae in second language speech production. In: H. Dechert , D. Möhle , & M. Raupach (Eds.), Second language productions (pp.114–137). Tübignen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Révész, A
    (2014) Towards a fuller assessment of cognitive models of task-based learning: Investigating task-generated cognitive demands and processes. Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 87–92. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt039 [Google Scholar]
34. Robinson, P
    (2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In: P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.114–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.012 [Google Scholar]
35. Sangarun, J
    (2001) The effects of pre-task planning on foreign language performance (Unpublished doctoral thesis), OISE-University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Skehan, P
    (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Skaalvik, E
    (1997) Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 71–81. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.89.1.71
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.71 [Google Scholar]
38. Steele-Johnson, D. , Beauregard, R. , Hoover, P. , & Schmidt, A
    (2000) Goal orientation and task complexity effects on motivation, affect, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 724–738. doi: 10.1037/0021‑9010.85.5.724
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.724 [Google Scholar]
39. Tavakoli, P. , & Skehan, P
    (2005) Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In: R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.239–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.11.15tav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav [Google Scholar]
40. Towell, R. , Hawkins, R. , & Bazergui, N
    (1996) The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. doi: 10.1093/applin/17.1.84
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84 [Google Scholar]
41. Wolfe-Quintero, K. , Inagaki, S. , & Kim, H.Y
    (1998) Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Technical report 17. Manoa: University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]