1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Generative phonology as applied linguistics, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/aral.4.1.01mce-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.4.1.01mce
1981-01-01
2019-11-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cena, R.M.
    (1978) When is a phonological generalization psychologically real?Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chomsky, Carol
    (1973) “Reading, writing, and phonology”. In: Frank Smith (ed.), Psycholinguistics and Reading. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winstone. pp.91–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Crothers, John
    (1973) On the Abstractness Controversy. Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels
    (1975) “A phonological analysis of English sp, st, sk with special reference to speech error evidence”, Journal of the International Phonetic Association5, 1. 3–25. doi: 10.1017/S0025100300001158
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300001158 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dressier, Wolfgang U.
    (1979) “Arguments and non-arguments for naturalness in phonology: on the use of external evidence”, Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, VolII, pp.93–100, Copenhagen, Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fabian, E. , Fabian and C. Peck
    (1971) “The morphophonemics of Nabak”. Kivung4, 3, pp.147–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fromkin, Victoria A.
    (1971) “The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances”. Language47, 1, pp.27–52. doi: 10.2307/412187
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412187 [Google Scholar]
  8. Grimes, J.E.
    (1969) Phonological Analysis, Part One, Santa Ana, CA, Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Harms, Robert T.
    (1973) “How abstract is Nupe?” Language46, 2. pp.439–446. doi: 10.2307/412462
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412462 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hyman, Larry M.
    (1970) “How concrete is phonology?” Language46, 1. pp.58–76. doi: 10.2307/412407
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412407 [Google Scholar]
  11. Iverson, G.K. and G.A. Sanders
    (1978) The Functional determination of Phonological Rule Interactions, Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club,
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kiparsky, Paul
    (1975) “What are phonological theories about?” In: D. Cohen and J. Wirth (eds.), Testing Linguistic Hypotheses. Washington, Hemisphere Publ. Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Koutsoudas, A.
    (ed.) (1976) The Application and Ordering of Grammatical Rules, The Hague, Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Linell, Per
    (1979) “Psychological reality and the concept of phonological rule”. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol.II, pp.114–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McElhanon, K.A.
    (1970) “Selepet pronominal elements”. Pacific LinguisticsA, 26, pp.23–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1979) “A fresh look at Nabak morphophonemics”, ( submitted to Kivungz ). ms.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1980) “Another knock-out for generative phonology”. Paper presented to theTwelfth Annual Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 25-27 August, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. McElhanon, K.A. and C.L. Voorhoeve.
    (1970) The Trans-New Guinea Phylum: Explorations in Deep-level Genetic Relationships. Pacific LinguisticsB, 16.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pike, E.V.
    (1976) “Phonology”. In: Ruth M. Brend and K.L. Pike (eds.), Trends in Linguistics, Tagmemics, Vol.1, Aspects of the Field, The Hague, Mouton, pp.45–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pike, K.L.
    (1947) Phonemics. University of Michigan Publication, LinguisticsVol.III, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1967) Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague, Mouton. doi: 10.1037/14786‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/14786-000 [Google Scholar]
  22. Skousen, R.
    (1974) “An explanatory theory of morphology”. Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.318–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1979) “Empirical Interpretations of psychological reality:. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol.II, pp.121–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stampe, David
    (1973) A Dissertation of Natural Phonology. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Trommelen, M. and W. Zonneveld
    (1978) Where the Principles Fail. Bloomington, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.4.1.01mce
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error