Assessing pupils’ intelligence – the accuracy of teachers’ perceptions when responding particularly to pupils’ speech-style

References

1. Briggs, D.
   (1970) “Influence of handwriting on assessment.”Educational Research13, pp. 50–55. doi: 10.1080/0013188700130107
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188700130107 [Google Scholar]
2. Crowl, T.K. and MacGinitie, W.H.
   (1974) “Influence of students’ speech characteristics on teachers’ evaluation of oral answers: ninth grade boys,”Journal of Educational Psychology66/3: 304–308. doi: 10.1037/h0036498
   https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036498 [Google Scholar]
3. D’Anglejan, A. and Tucker, G.R.
   (1973) “Sociolinguistic correlates of speech style in Quebec,”in Shuy, R.W. and Fasold, R.W. (Eds.) Language Attitudes: Current Trends and ProspectsWashington D.C., Georgetown University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Eltis, K.J.
   (1978) “The ascription of attributes to pupils by teachers and student teachers with particular reference to the influence of voice in this process,”Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Sydney, Macquarie University.
5. Giles, H.
   1970 “Evaluative reactions to accents.”Educational Review 22:211–227 doi: 10.1080/0013191700220301
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191700220301 [Google Scholar]
6. Giles, H.
   (1971a) “A study of speech patterns in social interactions: accent evaluation and accent change,”Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Bristol, University of Bristol.
7. Giles, H.
   (1971b) “Patterns of evaluation in reactions to R.P., South Welsh and Somerset accented speech,”British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology10: 280–281 doi: 10.1111/j.2044‑8260.1971.tb00748.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1971.tb00748.x [Google Scholar]
8. Giles, H.
   (1972) “The effects of stimulus mildness – broadness in the evaluation of accents.”Language and Speech15: 262–269
   [Google Scholar]
9. Giles, H. and Bourhis, R.Y.
   (1973) “Dialect perception re-visited.”Quarterly Journal of Speech59/3: 337–342 doi: 10.1080/00335637309383183
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383183 [Google Scholar]
10. Giles, H. and Powesland, P.F.
    (1975) Speech Style and Social EvaluationLondon, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Huck, S.W. and Bounds, W.G.
    (1972) “Essay grades: An interaction between graders’ handwriting clarity and the neatness of examination papers”, American Educational Research Journal9/2: 279–283 doi: 10.3102/00028312009002279
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312009002279 [Google Scholar]
12. Lambert, W.E. , Hodgson, R.C. , Gardner, R.C. and Fillenbaum, S.
    (1960) “Evaluational reactions to spoken languages”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology60/1: 44–51 doi: 10.1037/h0044430
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430 [Google Scholar]
13. Lee, R.R.
    (1971) “Dialect perception: a critical review and re-evaluation,”Quarterly Journal of Speech57: 410–417 doi: 10.1080/00335637109383086
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637109383086 [Google Scholar]
14. Marshall, J.C.
    (1967) “Composition errors and examination grades reexamined,”American Educational Research Journal414: 375–385 doi: 10.3102/00028312004004375
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312004004375 [Google Scholar]
15. Mitchell, A.G.
    (1970) “The Australian accent,”In Ramson, W.S. (Ed.) English Transported: Essays on Australasian EnglishCanberra, Australian National University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mitchell, A.G. and Delbridge, A.
    (1965) The Speech of Australian Adolescents: A SurveySydney, Angus and Robertson
    [Google Scholar]
17. Seligman, C.R. , Tucker, G.R. and Lambert, W.E.
    (1972) “The effects of speech style and other attributes on teachers’ attitudes toward children,”Language in Society1: 131–142 doi: 10.1017/S004740450000659X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450000659X [Google Scholar]
18. Wilkinson, A.
    (1965) Spoken EnglishEducational Review Occasional Publication No. 2. Birmingham, Institute of Education, Birmingham University.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Williams, F.
    (1970) “Psychological correlates of speech characteristics: On sounding disadvantaged,”Journal of Speech and Hearing Research13: 472–488 doi: 10.1044/jshr.1303.472
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1303.472 [Google Scholar]