1887
Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Focusing specifically on the negotiation of commonality, this study explores rapport building ( Spencer-Oatey, 2000 ) in online intercultural text chat, where Australian students of Italian interact with L1 Italian speakers. Although the initial purpose of the examined chat exchanges is to facilitate L2 acquisition, analysis of transcripts indicates that participants also seek to establish affiliation and friendship, through discussion of shared experiences, preferred leisure activities, and personal likings. Such orientation to like-mindedness and commonality can be an concern in their interactions, as well as an mentionable in their talk. Participants also successfully engage in complex face-saving and rapport maintenance strategies where there is potential for disagreement. Overall, the data suggest that identified rapport-building language and behaviors promote the establishment of positive relationships, as a key component of online intercultural text chat. Thus, from a pedagogical viewpoint, these interactions appear beneficial both for L2 learning and student wellbeing. The study concludes with suggestions for the integration of similar tasks into language programs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.40.2.07tud
2017-12-01
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ädel, A.
    (2011) Rapport building in student group work. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 2932–2947. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger, C. R. , & Calabrese, R. J.
    (1975) Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1975.tb00258.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. C.
    (1987) Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, C. , Drew, P. , & Pinch, T.
    (2003) Managing prospect affiliation and rapport in real-life sales encounters. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1177/14614456030050010101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010101 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, S.
    (2004) Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.59.8.676
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676 [Google Scholar]
  6. Diener, E. , & Seligman, M. E.
    (2002) Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9280.00415
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dooly, M. , & Tudini, V.
    (2016) ‘Now we are teachers’: The role of small talk in student language teachers’ telecollaborative task development. Journal of Pragmatics, 102, 38–53. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dörnyei, Z. , & Murphey, T.
    (2003) Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667138
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667138 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dreyer, C. , & Oxford, R. L.
    (1996) Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp.61–74). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Forbes, S. H.
    (2003) Holistic education: An analysis of its ideas and nature. Brandon, VT: Foundation for Educational Renewal.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Garcia, A. C. , & Jacobs, J. B.
    (1999) The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337–367. doi: 10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gass, S. M.
    (2013) Input, interaction, and the second language learner. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gil, D.
    (2008) Toward a ‘radical’paradigm of restorative justice. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp.499–511). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Herring, S.
    (1999) Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4), 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hudak, P. L. , & Maynard, D. W.
    (2011) An interactional approach to conceptualising small talk in medical interactions. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33(4), 634–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9566.2011.01343.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01343.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Liddicoat, A. J. , & Tudini, V.
    (2013) Expert-novice orientations: Native speaker power and the didactic voice in online intercultural interaction. In F. Sharifian & M. Jamarani (Eds.), Intercultural communication in the new era (pp.181–197). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MacIntyre, P. D. , Dörnyei, Z. , Clément, R. , & Noels, K. A.
    (1998) Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb05543.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Markee, N. P. P.
    (2000) Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Maslow, A. H.
    (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. doi: 10.1037/h0054346
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346 [Google Scholar]
  20. Maynard, D. W. , & Zimmerman, D. H.
    (1984) Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 301–316. doi: 10.2307/3033633
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3033633 [Google Scholar]
  21. Palmieri, C.
    (2017) Belonging, idealized self and wellbeing: Key motivators among adult learners of Italian in Sydney. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 178–195. doi: 10.1075/aral.40.2.06pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.40.2.06pal [Google Scholar]
  22. Schegloff, E. A. , & Sacks, H.
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. doi: 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  23. Seligman, M. E. P.
    (2012) Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Atria Books. (Original work published 2011).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Spencer-Oatey, H.
    (2000) Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking. Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp.11–46). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2005) (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 95–119. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95 [Google Scholar]
  26. Spencer-Oatey, H. , & Stadler, S.
    (2009) The global people competency framework. Competencies for effective intercultural interaction (Vol.3). Centre for Applied Linguistics, University of Warwick. Retrieved fromwww2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/cross_fac/globalpeople/resourcebank/gppublications/gp_competency_framework.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Svennevig, J.
    (2000) Getting acquainted in conversation: A study of initial interactions. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/pbns.64
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.64 [Google Scholar]
  28. Statista
    Statista (2017) Most famous social network sites worldwide as of January 2017, ranked by number of active users (in millions). Retrieved fromhttps://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Strambi, A. , Luzeckyj, A. , & Rubino, A.
    (2017) Flourishing in a second language (FL2): Integrating Positive Psychology, Transition Pedagogy and CLIL principles. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 123–141. doi: 10.1075/aral.40.2.03str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.40.2.03str [Google Scholar]
  30. Thorne, S. L.
    (2003) Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tudini, V.
    (2010) Online Second Language Acquisition: A conversation analysis of online chat. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ware, P. D. , & Kramsch, C.
    (2005) Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89, 190–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2005.00274.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00274.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Žegarac, V. , Spencer-Oatey, H. , & Ushioda, E.
    (2014) Conceptualizing mindfulness – mindlessness in intercultural interaction. International Journal of Language and Culture, 1(1), 75–97. doi: 10.1075/ijolc.1.1.05zeg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.1.1.05zeg [Google Scholar]
  34. Zemel, A. , & Çakir, M. P.
    (2009) Reading’s work in VMT. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying virtual math teams (pp.261–276). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑0228‑3_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0228-3_14 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/aral.40.2.07tud
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.40.2.07tud
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conversation analysis , Italian , online relationship building , online text chat and wellbeing
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error