1887
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.5.1.04col
1982-01-01
2024-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dik, S.
    1980 Studies in Functional Grammar, New York, Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Faraci, R.
    1971 “On the deep question of pseudo-clefts”, English Linguistics, 6, pp.48–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Huddleston, R.
    1971 The Sentence in Written English, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lees, R.B.
    1963 “Analysis of the ‘cleft sentence’ in English”, Zeitschrift fur Phonetik Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikations Forschung, 16, pp.371–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Halliday, M.A.K.
    1967 “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English Part 2”, Journal of Linguistics, 3, pp.199–244. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700016613
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1982 A Short Introduction to Functional Grammar, London, Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. unpub. MS, The Meaning of Modern English.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nakada, S.
    1973 “Pseudo-clefts: what are they?” Proceedings from the 9th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Prince, E.F.
    1978 “A comparison of WH-clefts and it-clefts in discourse”. Language, 54, pp.883–906. doi: 10.2307/413238
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413238 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.5.1.04col
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error