Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Al-Jumaily, A.
    1982 A developmental study of the acquisition of certain syntactic features by Arabic-speaking learners. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Edinburgh.
  2. Anshen, Frank.
    1975 Varied objections to various variable rules. InAnalyzing Variation in Language, Ralph W. Fasold and Roger W. Shuy (eds.). Washington D.C., Georgetown University Press. 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, Beryl L.
    1966Jamaican Creole Syntax: a transformational approach. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailey, Charles-James N.
    1974Variation and Linguistic Theory. Washington D.C., Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickerton, Derek.
    1971 Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language. 7:457–492.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cedergren, Henrietta J. and David Sankoff
    1974 Variable rules: performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language. 5:333–355.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dahl, Osten
    1979 Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics. 17:79–106. doi: 10.1515/ling.1979.17.1‑2.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.79 [Google Scholar]
  8. DeCamp, David
    1968 Towards a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. Paper delivered at theconference on Pidginization and Creolization of languages. Mona, Jamaica 1968 InPidginization and Creolization of Languages. Dell Hymes (ed.) 1971 Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 349–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DeCamp, David.
    1971 Implicational scales and sociolinguistic linearity. Linguistics. 73:30–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dickerson, Lonna J.
    1975 The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly. 9:401–407. doi: 10.2307/3585624
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3585624 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferguson, Charles A.
    1971 Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: a study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. InPidginization and Creolization of Languages 1971  Dell Hymes (ed.). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 141–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Guttman, Louis
    1944 A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review. 9:139–150. doi: 10.2307/2086306
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2086306 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hyltenstam, Kenneth
    1977 Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning. 27:383–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1977.tb00129.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00129.x [Google Scholar]
  14. 1978 Variation in interlanguage syntax. Working Papers. Department of Linguistics. Lund University. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1981 The use of typological markedness conditions as predictors of second language acquisition: the case of pronominal copies in relative clauses. Paper presented atEuropean-North American Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research. Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Keenan, Edward L. and Bernard Comrie
    1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry. 8:63–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kleinmann, Howard H.
    1977 Avoidance behaviour in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning. 27:93–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1977.tb00294.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00294.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Labov, William
    1969 Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language. 45:715–762. doi: 10.2307/412333
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412333 [Google Scholar]
  19. Platt, John T.
    1976 Implicational scaling and its pedagogical implications. Working Papers in Language and Linguistics. 4/46–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1979 Variation and implicational relationships: copula realization in Singapore English. General Linguistics. 19:1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Platt, John T. and Heidi Weber
    1980English in Singapore and Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Quirk, R. , S. Greenbaum , G. Leech and J. Svartvik
    1972A Grammar of Contemporary English. London. Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schachter, Jacqueline
    1974 An error in error analysis. Language Learning. 24:205–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1974.tb00502.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00502.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Simukoko, Youngson T.
    1981 Some aspects of the English of Bantu speakers in Urban Primary Schools in Zambia. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Edinburgh.
  25. Wolfram, Walt
    1969A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington D.C.Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1973 On what basis variable rules. InNew Ways of Analysing Variation in English. Charles-James N. Bailey and Roger W. Shuy (eds.). Washington D.C.Georgetown University Press. 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1974 The relationship of southern white speech to vernacular Black English: copula deletion and invariant be. Language. 50:498–577. doi: 10.2307/412221
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412221 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error