1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics
  4. Volume 9, Issue 2
  5. Article
Literacy
  • ISSN 0155-0640
  • E-ISSN: 1833-7139
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper is concerned with crucial issues which need to be addressed in attempting to define literacy. Several persistent myths or common misreadings of the nature of literacy are critiqued, namely the myths of literacy as: an absolute, word perfect standard; a collection of functional skills; an autonomous, context-free and unified competence; and a means of economic benefit. Alternative definitions, differing radically from the myths in their reading of reality, are proposed. These argue for a broad, inclusive definition which takes into account two broad perspectives – (i) the essentially creative meaning-centred and relative nature of language learning or use, and (ii) the patterns of social and cultural contexts in which literate behaviours are learnt, developed, constrained by or act to constrain the literacy of others. A dual focus is argued for. First, a focus on individual learning and experience serves to highlight the essentially constructive, selective, purposeful nature of the literacy process and the organic relation between literacy, experience, personal growth and autonomy. Thus, literacy is seen as transcending exclusively linguistic considerations and empowering its possessors to make sense of, to read and reread their experience, both to “take meanings” from the world and to act to transform that world. The second essential focus entails the recognition that socio-cultural contexts, including the nature, availability or distribution of information and printed materials in a society, are a vital part of the literacy process itself, shaping the meaning, values status and conceptions of literacy practices or competences. Hence discussion moves to the wider definitional framework for the analysis of literacies as social practices embedded in socio-cultural contexts of parent-child relationships, socialization patterns and ideologies.

© 1986 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/aral.9.2.01gra
1986-01-01
2024-12-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/aral.9.2.01gra
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, R. et al
    (1985) Becoming a nation of readers: the report of the Commission on Reading. Champaign, IL.Centre for the study of reading, university of Illinois.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Blaug, M.
    (1966) Literacy and economic development. The School Review. 74:393–418. doi: 10.1086/442786
     https://doi.org/10.1086/442786 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boomer, G.
    (1983) In search of a universal literacy program. In J. Anderson and K. Lovett (eds.) Teaching reading and writing to every child. Adelaide, Australian Reading Association: 2–15
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bormuth, J.
    (1978) Value and volume of literacy. Visible Language. 12:118–162.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourke, S.F. and J.P. Keeves
    (1977) Australian studies in school performance: Volume III, the mastery of literacy and numeracy. Final Report, E.R.D.C., Report 13, Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Britton, J. , T. Burgess , N. Martin , A. McLeod and H. Rosen
    (1975) The development of writing abilities11–18. London, Macmillan Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bruner, J.
    (1984) Language, mind and reading. In H. Goelman , A. Oberg and F. Smith (eds.) Awakening to literacy. Exeter, Heinemann: 193–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bullock, A. et al
    (1975) A language for life (The Bullock Report). London, HMSO.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cambourne, B. and P. Rousch
    (1980) There’s more to reading than meets the eye .... Australian Journal of Reading. 3,2, June:107–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Carroll, L.
    (1975) Alice’s adventures in wonderland and through the looking glass. Berkshire, Purnell Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Carozzi, B.
    (1974) Literacy: what is it?. The Secondary Teacher. No.201: 4–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. De Ford, D. and J. Harste
    (1982) Child language research and curriculum. Language Arts. 59,6, September:590–600.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Foster, P.
    (1983) Keynote Address: 7th National Conference of the Australian Council for Adult Literacy, Canberra, October 1983. Literacy Link. 165,1:5–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Freire, P.
    (1983) The importance of the act of reading. Journal of Education. 165,1:5–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodman, K.
    (1982) Language and literacy: selected papers. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodman, Y. and C. Burke
    (1980) Reading strategies: focus on comprehension. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Goody, J.
    (ed.) (1968) Literacy in traditional societies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (1977) The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Grant, A.
    (1985) Learning from the life stories of adult literacy students. Readings in adult basic education. Melbourne, Australian Council for Adult Literacy: 19–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (1986) Opportunity to do brilliantly: TAFE and the challenge of adult literacy provisions in Australia. Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (1987) Young readers reading. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (in press) Towards a transactive theory of the reading process and research in evaluation. Institute of Student Assessment and Evaluation, University of Florida.
  23. Grant, A. and L. Hayles
    (1981) Literacy for adults. Melbourne, Council of Adult Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gribble, H. and A. Grant
    (1983) Adult literacy research report 1982-1983. Melbourne, Draft Report, Council of Adult Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Halliday, M. and R. Hasan
    (1980) Text and context: aspects of language in social-semiotic perspective, (Sophia Linguistica VI), Tokyo, Sophia university Press.
  26. Harste, J. , V. Woodward and C. Burke
    (1984) Examining our assumptions: a transactional view of literacy and learning. Research in the Teaching of English. 18,1, February:84–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. (1984) Language stories and literacy lessons. Portsmouth, Heinemann.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Heath, S.B.
    (1982) What no bedtime story means: narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society. 11:49–76. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500009039
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500009039 [Google Scholar]
  29. (1983) Ways with words. Cambridge, Cambridge university Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hildyard, A. and D. Olson
    (1978) Literacy and the specialisation of language. Unpublished MS, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
  31. Hillerick, R.
    (1976) Towards an assessable definition of literacy. English Journal. February:50–55. doi: 10.2307/814811
     https://doi.org/10.2307/814811 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hunter, G. and D. Harman
    (1979) Adult literacy in the united States: a report to the Ford Foundation. New York, McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Levine, K.
    (1980) Becoming literate: final report on a research project Adult illiteracy and the socialization of adult illiterates. Dept. of Sociology, University of Nottingham.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (1982) Functional literacy: fond illusions and false economies. Harvard Educational Review. 52,3:249–266. doi: 10.17763/haer.52.3.77p7168115610811
     https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.52.3.77p7168115610811 [Google Scholar]
  35. (1986) The social context of literacy. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Little, G.
    (1981) Schools and skills. Fine Print. No.17:11-16, 42–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Moy, B. and M. Raleigh
    (1984) Comprehension: bringing it back alive. In J. Miller (ed.) Eccentric propositions. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul: 148–192.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Olson, D.
    (1977) From utterance to text: the bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review. 47,3:257–281. doi: 10.17763/haer.47.3.8840364413869005
     https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.3.8840364413869005 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pollock, Y.
    (1983) A study of the reading strategies of five adult literacy students. Unpublished report, School of Education, La Trobe University.
  40. Smith, F.
    (1978) Reading. Cambridge, Cambridge university Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. (1983) Essays into literacy. Exeter, Heinemann Educational Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Spencer, J.
    (1975) Learning to read and the reading process. In H. Rosen (ed.) Language and literacy in our schools. London, University of London Institute of Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Spencer, M.
    (1986) Emergent literacies: a site for analysis. Language Arts. 63,5:442–453.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Street, B.
    (1984) Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Tickell, G.
    (1981) Literacy and transition. English in Australia. 56:3–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wells, G.
    (1986) The meaning makers: children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth, Heinemann.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/aral.9.2.01gra
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error