oa On the interplay between case and focus in Classical and dialectal Arabic systems

References

1. Al-Balushi, R. A.
   (2011) Case in standard Arabic: The untraveled paths. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alexopoulou, T., E. Doron, and C. Heycock
   (2004) Broad subjects and clitic left dislocation. InD. Adger, C de Cat and G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, pp.329–358. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑1910‑6_14
   https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_14 [Google Scholar]
3. Aoun, J., E. Benmamoun, and L. Choueiri
   (2010) The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakir, M. J.
   (1979) Aspects of clause structure in Arabic: A study in word order variation in literary Arabic. Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bettega, S.
   (2014) The use of dialectal Tanwin in Qatari Arabic. RiCOGNIZIONI. Rivista di Lingue e Letterature straniere e Culture moderne1(2), 15–25.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blau, J.
   (1966) A Grammar of Christian Arabic, based mainly on South-Palestinian texts from the first millennium, Volume2671. Louvain: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blau, J.
   (1981) The emergence and linguistic background of Judaeo-Arabic: A study of the origins of Middle Arabic, Volume51. Leiden: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Blau, J.
   (1983) Vestiges of tanwīn -un and the case ending -u as attested in Yemenite Judeo-Arabic texts from the seventeenth century. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies46(3), 529–531. 10.1017/S0041977X00043196
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00043196 [Google Scholar]
9. Bresnan, J.
   (1994) Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language70(1), 72–131. 10.2307/416741
   https://doi.org/10.2307/416741 [Google Scholar]
10. Bresnan, J., A. Asudeh, I. Toivonen, and S. Wechsler
    (2015) Lexical-functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 10.1002/9781119105664
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119105664 [Google Scholar]
11. Bresnan, J. and J. M. Kanerva
    (1989) Locative Inversion in Chicheŵa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry201, 1–50.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bresnan, J. and S. A. Mchombo
    (1987) Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa. Language63(4), 741–782. 10.2307/415717
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415717 [Google Scholar]
13. Butt, M.
    (2006) Theories of case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164696
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164696 [Google Scholar]
14. Butt, M. and A. Deo
    (2013) A historical perspective on dative subjects in Indo-Aryan. Paper presented atLFG13, Debrecen, Hungary.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Butt, M., T. H. King, M. Ninõ, and F. Segond
    (1999) A Grammar Writer’s Cookbook. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Butt, M. and T. H. King
    (1996) Structural topic and focus without movement. InM. Butt and T. H. King (Eds.), Proceedings of LFG96, Stanford. CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Camilleri, M.
    (2021) Revisiting Arabic predicative structures. InM. Butt, J. Findlay, and I. Toivonen (Eds.), Proceedings of LFG21, pp.51–71. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chomsky, N.
    (2000) Minimalist inquires: The framework. InR. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step, pp.89–155. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Chomsky, N.
    (2001) Derivation by phase. InM. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, pp.1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
20. Comrie, B.
    (2013) Alignment of Case Marking of full noun phrases. InM. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures online. Munich: Max Plank Digital Library.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Doron, E. and C. Heycock
    (1999) Filling and licensing multiple specifiers. InD. Adger, S. Pintzuk, B. Plunkett, and G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Specifiers: Minimalist approaches, pp.69–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238133.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238133.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
22. Edzard, L.
    (2018) The Marked Nominative in Arabic, Semitic, and Afroasiatic. Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes (Harrassowitz)1151, 105–126. 10.2307/j.ctvcm4fp0.6
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4fp0.6 [Google Scholar]
23. Eythόrsson, T. and J. Barðdal
    (2005) Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language81(4), 824–881. 10.1353/lan.2005.0173
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0173 [Google Scholar]
24. Grimshaw, J.
    (1990) Argument Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hallberg, A.
    (2016) Case Endings in Spoken Standard Arabic. Ph. D. thesis, Lund University.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hallman, P.
    (2020) Head and dependent marking in clausal possession. Linguistic Inquiry41, 1–30.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Holes, C.
    (2004) Tanwin in the Arabic dialects of Eastern and South-Eastern Arabia. EDNA, Estudios de dialectolog’ıa norteafricana y andalusί81, 89–97.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hopkins, S.
    (1992) Studies in the Grammar of Early Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ingham, B.
    (1982) North East Arabian dialects. London: Kegan Paul International.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ingham, B.
    (1994) Najdi Arabic: Central Arabian. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.1 [Google Scholar]
31. Jackendoff, R. S.
    (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Legate, J. A.
    (2008) Morphological and abstract case. Linguistic Inquiry39(1), 55–101. 10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55 [Google Scholar]
33. Marantz, A.
    (2000) Case and licensing. InE. J. Reuland (Ed.), Arguments and case: Explaining Burzio’s Generalization, pp.11–30. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.34.04mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.34.04mar [Google Scholar]
34. Mohammad, M. A.
    (1998) The syntax of indefinite subjects in equative sentences in Palestinian Arabic. Ms. University of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Moutaouakil, A.
    (1988) Essais en Grammaire Fonctionelle. Rabat: Societé Marocaine des Editeurs Réunis.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ouhalla, J.
    (1997) Remarks on focus in Standard Arabic. InM. Eid and R. R. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics X, pp.9–46. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.153.04ouh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.153.04ouh [Google Scholar]
37. Owens, J.
    (2006) A linguistic history of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290826.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290826.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
38. Palva, H.
    (2000) Linguistic notes on a dialectal 17th-18th-century Egyptian Arabic narrative. Oriente Moderno19(1), 83–97. 10.1163/22138617‑08001006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-08001006 [Google Scholar]
39. Palva, H.
    (2015) Notes on the language of narratives. Studia Orientalia Electronica691, 114–135.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Prince, E. F.
    (1992) The ZPG Letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. InW. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, 295–326. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.16.12pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri [Google Scholar]
41. Rivero, M. L.
    (2008) Oblique subjects and person restrictions in Spanish: A morphological approach. InR. D’Alessandro, S. Fischer and G. H. Hrafnbjargarson (Eds.), Agreement restrictions, pp.215–250. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207835.215
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207835.215 [Google Scholar]
42. Shlonsky, U.
    (2000) Remarks on the complementizer layer of Standard Arabic. InJ. Lecarme, J. Lowenstamm and U. Shlonsky (Eds.), Research in Afroasiatic Grammar, pp.325–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.202.15shl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.202.15shl [Google Scholar]
43. Silverstein, M.
    (1976) Hierarchy of features and ergativity. InR. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, pp.112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Smith-Stark, T. C.
    (1974) The plurality split. Chicago Linguistics Society10(1), 657–672.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Soltan, U.
    (2007) On Formal Feature Licensing in Minimalism: Aspects of Standard Arabic Morphosyntax. Ph. D. thesis, University of Maryland.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Stokes, P. W.
    (2020) A fresh analysis of the origin and diachronic development of “dialectal Tanwīn” in Arabic. Journal of the American Oriental Society140(3), 637–664.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Stokes, P. W.
    (2023) Nominal Case in Christian Arabic Translations of the gospels (9th-15th Centuries CE). Arabica701, 239–322. 10.1163/15700585‑20231668
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15700585-20231668 [Google Scholar]
48. Tyler, M.
    (2020) Argument structures and argument-marking in Choctaw. Ph. D. thesis, Yale University.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Van Valin, R. D. and R. J. La Polla
    (1997) Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
50. Wagner, E.-M. and M. A. Ahmed
    (2017) From Tuscany to Egypt: Eighteenth century Arabic letters in the Prize Paper Collections. Journal of Semitic Studies62(2), 389–412. 10.1093/jss/fgx030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgx030 [Google Scholar]