Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D. & Wilkerson, J.
    (2011) Comparative studies of policy dynamics. Comparative Political Studies, 44 (8), 947–972. 10.1177/0010414011405160
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011405160 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blyth, M.
    (2013) Austerity. The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaqués-Bonafont, L., & Baumgartner, F. R.
    (2013) ‘Newspaper attention and policy activities in Spain’, Journal of Public Policy, 33(01), 65–88. 10.1017/S0143814X12000219
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X12000219 [Google Scholar]
  4. Borghetto, E. & Belchior, A. M.
    (2020) Party manifestos, opposition and media as determinants of the cabinet agenda. Political Studies, 68(1), 37–53. 10.1177/0032321718820738
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718820738 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosco, A. & Verney, S.
    (2016) From electoral epidemic to government epidemic: The next level of the crisis in Southern Europe. South European Society and Politics, 21(4), 383–406. 10.1080/13608746.2017.1303866
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2017.1303866 [Google Scholar]
  6. Budge, I., & Farlie, D.
    (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections. London: Allen & Urwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. M.
    (2016) First and Second Level Agenda-Setting in the Twitter-Sphere. an Application to the Italian Political Debate. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(2): 159–174. 10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dearing, J. W. & Rogers, E. M.
    (1996) Agenda setting. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dood, L. & Oppenheimer, B.
    (2013) The dynamics and dysfunction of the congressional budget process: From inception to deadlock. InL. Dodd & B. Oppenheimer (Eds.) Congress Reconsidered, 10th edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 465–493.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R.
    (2010) The political conditionality of mass media influence. When do parties follow mass media attention?British Journal of Political Science, 40, 663–677. 10.1017/S0007123410000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000037 [Google Scholar]
  11. Harder, R. A., Sevenans, J., & Van Aelst, P.
    (2017) Intermedia Agenda Setting in the Social Media Age: How Traditional Players Dominate the News Agenda in Election Times. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), 275–293. 10.1177/1940161217704969
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217704969 [Google Scholar]
  12. Helfer, L.
    (2016) Media Effects on Politicians: An Individual-Level Political Agenda-Setting Experiment. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 233–52. 10.1177/1940161215627461
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215627461 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hobolt, S. B. & Tilley, J.
    (2016) Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West European Politics, 39 (5), 971–991. 10.1080/01402382.2016.1181871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1181871 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jennings, W. & John, P.
    (2009) The dynamics of political attention: Public opinion and the Queen’s speech in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Political Science53(4), 838–854. 10.1111/j.1540‑5907.2009.00404.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00404.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Joly, J.
    (2014) ‘Do the media influence foreign aid because or in spite of the bureaucracy? A case study of Belgian aid determinants’, Political Communication, 31 (4), 584–603. 10.1080/10584609.2013.879361
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.879361 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones, B. D. & Baumgartner, F. R.
    (2005) The politics of attention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kingdon, J. W.
    (2003) Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd edition). New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Magalhães, P.
    (2014) The elections of the Great Recession in Portugal: Performance voting under a blurred responsibility for the economy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(2), 180–202. 10.1080/17457289.2013.874352
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2013.874352 [Google Scholar]
  19. Midtbø, T., Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P. & Christens, D. A.
    (2014) Do the media set the agenda of parliament or is it the other way around? Agenda interactions between MPs and mass media. InK. Deschouwer & S. Depauw (Eds.), Representing the people. A survey among members of statewide and substate parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 188–208. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684533.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684533.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller, E. A., Nadash, P. & Goldstein, R.
    (2014) ‘The role of the media in agenda setting: The case of long-term care rebalancing’, Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 34 (1), 30–45. 10.1080/01621424.2014.995259
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2014.995259 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mortensen, P. B., Green-Pedersen, C., Breeman, G., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., Jennings, W., John, P., Palau, A. M. & Timmermans, A.
    (2011) Comparing government agendas: Executive speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies, 44 (8), 973–1000. 10.1177/0010414011405162
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011405162 [Google Scholar]
  22. Neuman, R. W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S., & Bae, S. Y.
    (2014) The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda-Setting Theory Meets Big Data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193–214. 10.1111/jcom.12088
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088 [Google Scholar]
  23. Paletz, D.
    (1998) The media and public policy. InD. Graber, D. McQuail & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news. The news of politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 218–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Peeters, J., Van Aelst, P., & Praet, S.
    (2019) Party ownership or individual specialization? A comparison of politicians’ individual issue attention across three different agendas. Party Politics, Online First doi:  10.1177/1354068819881639
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819881639 [Google Scholar]
  25. Petrocik, J. R.
    (1996) Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. 10.2307/2111797
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pritchard, D. & Berkowitz, D.
    (1993) The limits of agenda-setting: the press and political responses to crime in the United States, 1950–1980. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5(1), 86–91. 10.1093/ijpor/5.1.86
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/5.1.86 [Google Scholar]
  27. Santana-Pereira, J. A. A.
    (2012) Media systems, information environments and media effects: A comparative approach to the agenda-setting hypothesis. PhD Dissertation: European University Institute.
  28. Sellers, P.
    (2010) Cycles of Spin: Strategic communication in the US congress, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Semetko, H. A., Blumler, J. G., Gurevitch, M., Weaver, D. H. & Barkin, S.
    (2013) The formation of campaign agendas: A comparative analysis of party and media roles in recent American and British elections. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203709276
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203709276 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S., & Vos, D.
    (2015) Political elites’ media responsiveness and their individual political goals: A study of national politicians in Belgium. Research & Politics, 2(3), 1–7. 10.1177/2053168015593307
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015593307 [Google Scholar]
  31. Soroka, S.
    (2002) Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 264–285. 10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264 [Google Scholar]
  32. Spoon, J.-J. & Klüver, H.
    (2015) Voter polarization and party responsiveness: Why parties emphasize divided issues but remain silent on unified issues. European Journal of Political Research, 54 (2), 343–62. 10.1111/1475‑6765.12087
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12087 [Google Scholar]
  33. Tavits, M.
    (2007) Principle vs. pragmatism: Policy shifts and political competition. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (1), 151–65. 10.1111/j.1540‑5907.2007.00243.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00243.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Thesen, G.
    (2013) When good news is scarce and bad news is good: Government responsibilities and opposition possibilities in political agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 52 (3), 364–389. 10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2012.02075.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02075.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Thesen, G., Green-Pedersen, C. & Mortensen, P. B.
    (2017) Priming, issue ownership, and party support: The electoral gains of an issue-friendly media agenda. Political Communication, 34 (2), 282–301. 10.1080/10584609.2016.1233920
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1233920 [Google Scholar]
  36. Valenzuela, S., & Arriagada, A.
    (2011) ‘Politics without citizens? Public opinion, television news, the president, and real-world factors in Chile, 2000–2005’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16 (3), 357–381. 10.1177/1940161210379636
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161210379636 [Google Scholar]
  37. Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S.
    (2011) Minimal or massive? The political agenda setting power of the mass media according to different methods. The International Journal of Press Politics, 16(3), 295–313. 10.1177/1940161211406727
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211406727 [Google Scholar]
  38. Van Aelst, P. & Walgrave, S.
    (2016) Political agenda setting by the mass media: ten years of research, 2005–2015. InN. Zahariadis (Ed.), Handbook of public policy agenda setting. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 157–179. 10.4337/9781784715922.00018
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715922.00018 [Google Scholar]
  39. Van Dalen, A. & Van Aelst, P.
    (2014) The media as political agenda-setters: Journalists’ perceptions of media power in eight west European countries. West European Politics, 37 (1), 42–64. 10.1080/01402382.2013.814967
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.814967 [Google Scholar]
  40. Van Noije, L., Kleinnijenhuis, J. & Oegema, D.
    (2008) ‘Loss of Parliamentary control due to mediatization and Europeanization: A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of agenda building in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands’, British Journal of Political Science, 38 (3), 455–478. 10.1017/S0007123408000239
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000239 [Google Scholar]
  41. Vliegenthart, R. & Walgrave, S.
    (2011a) Content matters: The dynamics of parliamentary questioning in Belgium and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies44 (8), 1031–1059. 10.1177/0010414011405168
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011405168 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2011b) When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium. Party Politics, 17(3), 321–342. 10.1177/1354068810366016
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810366016 [Google Scholar]
  43. Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Baumgartner, F. R., Bevan, S., Breunig, C., Brouard, S., Chaqués, L., Grossman, E., Jennings, W., Mortensen, P., Palau, A. M., Sciarini, P., & Tresch, A.
    (2016) Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55 (2), 293–301. 10.1111/1475‑6765.12134
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12134 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M.
    (2014) Which issues do parties emphasize? Salience strategies and party organization in multiparty systems. West European Politics, 37 (5), 1019–1045. 10.1080/01402382.2014.911483
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.911483 [Google Scholar]
  45. Walgrave, S. & P. Van Aelst
    (2006) The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication56, 88–109. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00005.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Walgrave, S., Soroka, S. & Nuytemans, M.
    (2008) The mass media’s political agenda-setting power. A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836. 10.1177/0010414006299098
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006299098 [Google Scholar]
  47. Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J. & Tresch, A.
    (2014) The limits of issue ownership dynamics: The constraining effect of party preference. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(1), 1–19. 10.1080/17457289.2013.811245
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2013.811245 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D. & Baumgartner, F.
    (2013) A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication30 (2), 175–192. 10.1080/10584609.2012.737419
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737419 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error