1887
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The compelling argument concept, one of the least studied components of attribute agenda setting, suggests that some attributes increase the salience of an object on the public agenda of issues. By conducting two studies, this article examines the compelling argument concept applying both manual content analysis (Study 1) and computerized-analysis tools (Study 2), considering frequency and degree centrality as measures of attribute salience. Results show that the application of computer-aided methods and mathematical techniques can efficiently identify attributes and estimate degree centrality, which are the core elements of the second and third level of the agenda-setting theory, respectively. Also, findings indicate that absolute frequency, rather than the presence or absence of an attribute in a news story, is a more parsimonious measure of redundancy to identify compelling arguments in news stories. This study proposes methodological innovations that further expand the scope of attribute agenda setting in the big data landscape.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/asj.1.1.04sal
2017-02-20
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bennett, W. L. , Lawrence, R. G. , & Livingston, S.
    (2006) None dare call it torture: Indexing and the limits of press independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 467–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00296.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00296.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Berelson, B.
    (1952) Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowe, B.J., Fahmy, S. , & Wanta, W.
    (2013) Missing religion: Second level agenda setting and Islam in American newspapers. The International Communication Gazette, 75(7), 636–652. doi: 10.1177/1748048513482544
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513482544 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chyi, H. I. , & McCombs, M.
    (2004) Media salience and the process of framing: Coverage of the Columbine school shootings. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 22–35. doi: 10.1177/107769900408100103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100103 [Google Scholar]
  5. DiMaggio, P. , Nag, M. & Blei, D.
    (2013) Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding. Poetics, 41, 570–606. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2013.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  6. DiMaggio, P.
    (2015) Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa). Big Data & Society. doi: 10.1177/2053951715602908
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715602908 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ghanem, S. I.
    (1996) Media coverage of crime and public opinion: An exploration of the second level of agenda setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1997) Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. InM. E. McCombs, D. Shaw & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy (pp.309–330). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Guo, L.
    (2012) The application of social network analysis in agenda setting research: A methodological exploration. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 616–631. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2012.732148
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732148 [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo, L. , Chen, Y. , Vu, H. , Wang, Q. , Aksamit, R. , Guzek, D. , Jachimowski, M. & McCombs, M.
    (2014) Coverage of the Iraq War in the United States, Mainland China, Taiwan and Poland. Journalism Studies. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.885198
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.885198 [Google Scholar]
  11. Guo, L. & McCombs, M.
    (eds.) (2016) The power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo, L. , & McCombs, M.
    (2011a) Network agenda setting: A third level of media effects. query Paper presented atthe International Communication Association (ICA) Annual Conference, Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2011b) Toward the third level of agenda setting theory: A network agenda setting model. Paper presented atthe Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, St. Louis, MO.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Guo, L. , Vargo, C. J. , Pan, Z. , Ding, W. , & Ishwar, P.
    (2016) Big social data analytics in journalism and mass communication: Comparing dictionary-based text analysis and unsupervised topic modeling. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hasell, A. A. , & McGregor, S. C.
    (2016) Black-box algorithms: Scholarly use of proprietary coding software in communication research. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, Y. & Kim, Y.
    (2014) Theoretical and methodological trends of agenda setting theory: A thematic meta-analysis of the last five decades. Working paper, University of Alabama.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiousis, S.
    (2005) Compelling arguments and attitude strength. Exploring the impact of second-level agenda setting on public opinion of presidential candidate images. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(2), 3–27. doi: 10.1177/1081180X05276095
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05276095 [Google Scholar]
  18. Laver, M. , Benoit, K. , & Garry, J.
    (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311–331. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000698
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000698 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lewis, S. C. ; Zamith, R. & Hermida, A.
    (2013) Content analysis in an era of big data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 34–52. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2012.761702
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.761702 [Google Scholar]
  20. Littau, J. & Stewart, D. R.
    (2015) “Truthiness” and second-level agenda setting: Satire news and its influence on perceptions of television news credibility. Electronic News, 9(2), 122–136. doi: 10.1177/1931243115581416
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243115581416 [Google Scholar]
  21. McCombs, M.
    (2004) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2014) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd edition). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McCombs, M. & Ghanem, S.
    (2001) The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese , O. H. Gandy Jr. & A. E. Grant (Eds), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the worldpp.67–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. McCombs, M. , Holbert, L. , Kiousis, S. , & Wanta, W.
    (2011) The news and public opinion: Media effects on civic life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McCombs, M. , Llamas, J. P. , Lopez-Escobar, E. , & Rey, F.
    (1997) Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717. doi: 10.1177/107769909707400404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400404 [Google Scholar]
  26. McCombs, M. & Zhu, J.
    (1995) Capacity, diversity and volatility of the public agenda: Trends from 1954 to 1994 Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(4), 495–525. doi: 10.1086/269491
    https://doi.org/10.1086/269491 [Google Scholar]
  27. McMillan, S. J.
    (2000) The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 80–98. doi: 10.1177/107769900007700107
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700107 [Google Scholar]
  28. Moon, S. J.
    (2011) Attention, attitude, and behavior: Second-level agenda-setting effects as a mediator of media use and political participation. Communication Research, 40(5), 698–719. doi: 10.1177/0093650211423021
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211423021 [Google Scholar]
  29. Neuendorf, K.
    (2002) The content analysis guidebook. California: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Riffe, D. , Lacy, S. R. , & Fico, F. G.
    (2005) Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Saldaña, M. & Ardèvol-Abreu, A.
    (2016) From Compelling Arguments to Compelling Associations at the Third Level of Agenda Setting. In L. Guo & M. McCombs (Eds.), The Power of Information Networks: New Directions for Agenda Setting, (pp.104–118). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sheafer, T.
    (2007) How to evaluate It: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 21–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sjøvaag, H. , & Stavelin, E.
    (2012) Web media and the quantitative content analysis: Methodological challenges in measuring online news content. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 18(2), 215–229.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Son, Y. J. & Weaver, D.
    (2005) Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 2000 U.S. election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 174–197. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh090
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh090 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vargo, C. J. , Guo, L. , McCombs, M. , & Shaw, D. L.
    (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64, 296–316. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12089 [Google Scholar]
  36. Wanta, W. & and Hu, Y.
    (1994) Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(3), 225–240. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/6.3.225
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/6.3.225 [Google Scholar]
  37. Yioutas, J. & Segvic, I.
    (2003) Revisiting the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal: The convergence of agenda Setting and framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 567–82. doi: 10.1177/107769900308000306
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000306 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/asj.1.1.04sal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/asj.1.1.04sal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error