Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Agenda-setting research has been performed for more than four decades, both in traditional and online media, and the tools employed for this task have been very much accepted by media researchers around the world. Nevertheless, analysis of the public agenda in new media, particularly across social networks, requires re-thinking these same tools, which creates a series of methodological and theoretical challenges. The present paper seeks to illuminate these challenges and propose possible solutions for some of them.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Barabási, A. L.
    (2002) Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum, M. A. , & Groeling, T.
    (2008) Online media and the polarization of American political discourse. Political Communication, 25, 345–365. doi: 10.1080/10584600802426965
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802426965 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boczkowski, P. J. , & de Santos, M.
    (2007) When more media equals less news: Patterns of content homogenization in Argentina’s leading print and online newspapers. Political Communication24, 167–180. doi: 10.1080/10584600701313025
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701313025 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyd, D. , & Crawford, K.
    (2012) Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 662–679. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boynton, G. R. , & Richardson Jr., J. W.
    (2016) Agenda-Setting in the twenty-first century. New Media & Society18, 1916–1934. doi: 10.1177/1461444815616226
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616226 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brosius, H. B. , & Weimann, G.
    (1996) Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two- step flow. Communication Research, 23, 561–580. doi: 10.1177/009365096023005002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023005002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Buzzilla | Brand Monitoring, Social Media Analysis and Research
    Buzzilla | Brand Monitoring, Social Media Analysis and Research. (n.d.). RetrievedMarch 24, 2017, fromwww.buzzilla.com
  8. Chaffee, S. H. , & Metzger, M. J.
    (2001) The end of mass communication?Mass Communication and Society, 4, 365–379. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_3 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, W. , Boase, J. , & Wellman, B.
    (2002) The global villagers: Comparing Internet users and uses around the world. In B. Wellman , & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp.74–113). Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470774298.ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774298.ch2 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen, B. C.
    (1963) The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coleman, R. , & Banning, S.
    (2006) Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 313–328. doi: 10.1177/107769900608300206
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300206 [Google Scholar]
  12. Coleman, R. , McCombs, M. , Shaw, D. , & Weaver, D.
    (2009) Agenda-setting. In T. Hanitzsch , & K. Wahl-Jorgensen (Eds.), Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York, NY: Routledge, 147–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cooper, M. , & Kimmelman, G.
    (2001) The digital divide confronts the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Economic reality versus public policy. In B. Compaine . (Ed). The Digital divide – Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp.200–221). Boston, MA: MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dearing, J. W. , & Rogers, E.
    (1996) Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DiMaggio, P. , Hargittai, E. , Celeste, C. , & Shafer, S.
    (2004) From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp.355–400). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gitlin, T.
    (1998) Public sphere or public sphericules?In T. Liebes , & J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity (pp.168–174). London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Guo, L.
    (2013) Toward the third level of agenda-setting theory: A network agenda- setting model. In T. Johnson (Ed.), Agenda setting in a 2.0 world: New agendas in communication (pp.112–133). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo, L. , & Vargo, C.
    (2015) The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda-setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 557–576. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300 [Google Scholar]
  19. Habermas, J.
    (1979) Communication and evolution of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hargittai, E.
    (2002) Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). doi: 10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942 [Google Scholar]
  21. Iyengar, S. , & Kinder, D. R.
    (1987) News that matters: Agenda-setting and priming in a television age. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson, T. J. , & Perlmutter, D. D.
    (2010) Introduction: The Facebook election. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 554–559. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.517490
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.517490 [Google Scholar]
  23. Keen, A.
    (2007) The cult of the amateur: How today’s Internet is killing our culture. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Krippendorff, K.
    (2013) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, J. K. , & Coleman, R.
    (2014) Testing generational, life cycle, and period effects of age on agenda-setting. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 3–25. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2013.788721
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.788721 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, B. , Lancendorfer, K. M. , & Lee, K. J.
    (2005) Agenda-setting and the Internet: The intermedia influence of Internet bulletin boards on newspaper coverage of the 2000 general election in South Korea, Asian Journal of Communication, 15, 57–71. doi: 10.1080/0129298042000329793
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0129298042000329793 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lippmann, W.
    (1922) The mental age of Americans. The New Republic, 32, 297–298.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Madhavan, J. , Afanasiev, L. , Antova, L. , & Halevy, A.
    (2009) Harnessing the deep web: Present and future. Retrieved fromhttps://arxiv.org/abs/0909.1785.
  29. Malka, V. , Ariel, Y. , & Avidar, R.
    (2015) Fighting, worrying and sharing: Operation ‘Protective Edge’ as the first WhatsApp war. Media, War, and Conflict, 8, 329–344. doi: 10.1177/1750635215611610
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635215611610 [Google Scholar]
  30. McCombs, M.
    (2004) Setting the agenda: The mass public and the opinion . Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  31. (2014) Setting the Agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McCombs, M. , & Ghanem, S. I.
    (2001) The convergence of agenda-setting and framing. In S. D. Reese , O. H. Gandy Jr. , & A. E. Grant (Eds.). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp.67–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McCombs, M. , Holbert, L. , Kiousis, S. , & Wanta, W.
    (2011) The news and public opinion: Media effects on civic life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McCombs, M. , & Reynolds, A.
    (2009) How the news shapes our civic agenda. In: B. Jennings , & M. B. Beth Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 3rd ed.New York, NY: Routledge, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McCombs, M. E.
    (2005) A look at agenda setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6, 543–557. doi: 10.1080/14616700500250438
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438 [Google Scholar]
  36. McCombs, M. E. , & Shaw, D. L.
    (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. doi: 10.1086/267990
    https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 [Google Scholar]
  37. (1993) The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication43, 58–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01262.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Möller, K.
    (2010) Sense-making and agenda construction in emerging business networks – How to direct radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management39, 361–371. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.03.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.03.014 [Google Scholar]
  39. Napoli, P.
    (2011) Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Neuendorf, A. K.
    (2017) The content analysis guidebook2nd ed.Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Neuman, W. R. , Guggenheim, L. , Jang, S. M. , & Bae, S. Y.
    (2014) The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64, 193–214. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12088
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088 [Google Scholar]
  42. Purcell, K. , Rainie, L. , Mitchell, A. , Rosenstiel, T. , & Olmstead, K.
    (2010) Understanding the participatory news consumer. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved fromwww.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Online-News.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Scheufele, D. A.
    (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1999.tb02784.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x [Google Scholar]
  44. (2000) Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 297–316. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07 [Google Scholar]
  45. Scheufele, D. A. , & Tewksbury, D.
    (2007) Framing, agenda-setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schober, M. F. , Pasek, J. , Guggenheim, L. , Lampe, C. , & Conrad, F. G.
    (2016) Social media analyses for social measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80, 180–211. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfv048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv048 [Google Scholar]
  47. Shaw, D. , McCombs, M. , Weaver, D. H. , & Hamm, B. J.
    (1999) Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research11, 2–24. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/11.1.2
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.1.2 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sweetser, K. D. , Golan, G. J. , & Wanta, W.
    (2008) Intermedia agenda-setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication and Society11, 197–216. doi: 10.1080/15205430701590267
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701590267 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tarbush, B. , & Teytelboym, A.
    (2012) Homophily in online social networks. Internet and network economics. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 512–518. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑35311‑6_40
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35311-6_40 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tufekci, Z.
    (2014) Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. InICWSM ’14: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tuten, T. L. , Solomon, M. R.
    (2015) Social media marketing2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Van de Donk, W. , Loader, B. D. , Nixon, P. G. , & Rucht, D.
    (2004) Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements. London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Vargo, C. J. , Guo, L. , McCombs, M. , & Shaw, D. L.
    (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64, 296–316. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12089 [Google Scholar]
  54. Weaver, D. H. , & Choi, J.
    (2014) The media agenda: Who (or What) sets it?in K. Kenski , & K. H. Jamieson . (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of political ommunication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.37.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.37 [Google Scholar]
  55. Weaver, D. , McCombs, M. , & Shaw, D. L.
    (2004) Agenda-setting research: Issues, attributes, and influences. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 257–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Weimann, G. , Brosius, H. B.
    (2016) A new agenda for agenda-setting research in the digital era. In G. Vowe , & P. Henn . (Eds.). Political communication in the online world: Theoretical approaches and research designs (pp.26–44). London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Woodly, D.
    (2008) New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation. Public Choice134, 109–123. doi: 10.1007/s11127‑007‑9204‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9204-7 [Google Scholar]
  58. Woolley, J. K. , Limperos, A. M. , & Oliver, M. B.
    (2010) The 2008 presidential election, 2.0: A content analysis of user-generated political Facebook groups. Mass Communication and Society13, 631–652. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.516864
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.516864 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wu, H. D. , & Coleman, R.
    (2009) Advancing agenda-setting theory: The comparative strength and new contingent conditions of the two levels of agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 775–789. doi: 10.1177/107769900908600404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600404 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zerfos, P. , Cho, J. , & Ntoulas, A.
    (2005) Downloading textual hidden web content through keyword queries. InProceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL’05) (pp.100–109).
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Agenda-setting theory; new media, research challenges; online research
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error