Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Using agenda-setting theory, this study explores the effects of news sources on public opinion on the issue of the same-sex marriage over 10 years. It examines immediate substantive salience, immediate affective salience, cumulative substantive salience and cumulative affective salience of the news sources cited in news articles from The New York Times from 2003 to 2013 and compares the coverage to public opinion polls. Four findings merit notice. First, news sources with a clear standpoint had counter effects on public opinion. Second, the salience of news sources is as influential as the affective attribute salience of news sources on public opinion. Official sources had the power to influence public opinion the most. Thirdly, the influence of the media is stronger than the influence of news sources on influencing public opinion. Fourth, LGBTQ sources were the least used sources in the same-sex marriage coverage.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baunach, D. M.
    (2012) Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988 through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 364–378. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs022 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett, W. L. , & Paletz, D. L.
    (1994) Taken by storm: The media, public opinion, and US foreign policy in the Gulf War. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkowitz, D.
    (1987) TV news sources and news channels: A study in agenda building. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 64(3), 508. doi: 10.1177/107769908706400231
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908706400231 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berkowitz, D. A.
    (2009) Reporters and their sources. The Handbook of Journalism Studies, 102–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berkowitz, D. , & TerKeurst, J. V.
    (1999) Community as interpretive community: rethinking the journalist‐source relationship. Journal of Communication, 49, 125–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1999.tb02808.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02808.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, J. D. , Bybee, C. R. , Wearden, S. T. , & Straughan, D. M.
    (1987) Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversity. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 64, 45. doi: 10.1177/107769908706400106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908706400106 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, V. Y. , & Pain, P.
    (2016, June). What changed public opinion on the same sex marriage issue? New implications of attributes in media agenda setting. Paper presented atInternational Communication Association Annual Conference. Fukuoka, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Church statement on proposition 8 ruling
    Church statement on proposition 8 ruling (2010, August4). The Church of Jesus Christ of Later-Day Saints. Retrieved fromwww.mormonnewsroom.org/article/church-statement-on-proposition-8-ruling
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Curtin, P. A.
    (1999) Reevaluating public relations information subsidies: Market-driven journalism and agenda-building theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 53–90. doi: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1101_03
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1101_03 [Google Scholar]
  10. Davey, M.
    (2011, February1). Illinois: same-sex civil unions legalized. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dearing, J. W. , & Rogers, E. M.
    (1996) Agenda-setting. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dominus, S.
    (2009, April10). Another blow to self-regard of New York. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Donovan, J.
    (2010, September13). Pope condemns gay marriage, warns on biotech before U.K. Trip. Bloomberg. Retrieved fromwww.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-09-13/pope-condemns-gay-marriage-warns-on-biotechnology-before-trip-to-u-k
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Druckman, J. N.
    (2001) On the limits of framing effects: who can frame?Journal of Politics, 63, 1041–1066. doi: 10.1111/0022‑3816.00100
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00100 [Google Scholar]
  15. Eckholm, E.
    (2013, April24). Gay marriage measure advances in Rhode island. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Erbring, L. , Goldenberg, E. N. , & Miller, A. H.
    (1980) Front-page news and real-world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 16–49. doi: 10.2307/2110923
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2110923 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fishman, M.
    (2014) Manufacturing the news. University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gandy, O. H.
    (1982) Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gans, H. J.
    (1979) Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Geitner, P.
    (2012, July26). Open borders, but trouble crossing. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goodstein, L.
    (2008, April25). Gay bishop plans his civil union rite. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hallin, D. C.
    (1992) Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968–1988. Journal of communication, 42, 5–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1992.tb00775.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00775.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Harlow, S. , & Johnson, T. J.
    (2011) The Arab spring| overthrowing the protest paradigm? How the New York Times, Global Voices and Twitter covered the Egyptian revolution. International Journal of Communication, 5, 16.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Harrison, B. F. , & Michelson, M. R.
    (2015) God and marriage: The impact of religious identity priming on attitudes toward same‐sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 96, 1411–1423. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12169
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12169 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hartman, T. K. , & Weber, C. R.
    (2009) Who said what? The effects of source cues in issue frames. Political Behavior, 31, 537–558. doi: 10.1007/s11109‑009‑9088‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-009-9088-y [Google Scholar]
  26. Ho, S. S. , & McLeod, D. M.
    (2008) Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 35, 190–207. doi: 10.1177/0093650207313159
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207313159 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hovland, C. I. , & Weiss, W.
    (1951) The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650. doi: 10.1086/266350
    https://doi.org/10.1086/266350 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, M.
    (2015) Partisans and controversial news online: Comparing perceptions of bias and credibility in news content from blogs and mainstream media. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 17–36. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2013.877486
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.877486 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kiousis, S. , & McCombs, M.
    (2004) Agenda-Setting effects and attitude strength political figures during the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 31, 36–57. doi: 10.1177/0093650203260205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203260205 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kulish, N.
    (2010, July18). Gay parade in Warsaw meets jeers from some. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Liptak, A.
    (2015, June26). Supreme court ruling makes same-sex marriage a right nationwide. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.nytimes.com/2015/06/27/us/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage.html
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McCarthy, J.
    (2015, May19). Record-High 60% of Americans support same-sex marriage. Gallup. Retrieved fromwww.gallup.com/poll/183272/record-high-americans-support-sex-marriage.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  33. McCombs, M.
    (2014) Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McCombs, M. , Lopez-Escobar, E. , & Llamas, J. P.
    (2000) Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of Communication, 50, 77–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2000.tb02842.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02842.x [Google Scholar]
  35. McCombs, M. , & Valenzuela, S.
    (2007) The agenda-setting theory. Cuadernos de Información, 20, 44–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nagourney, A.
    (2005, April9). G.O.P. consultant weds his male partner. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Norris, P. , Kern, M. , & Just, M. R.
    (2003) Framing terrorism: The news media, the government, and the public. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. O’Heffernan, P.
    (1991) Mass media and American foreign policy: Insider perspectives on global journalism and the foreign policy process. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishers.
  39. (1994) Mass media roles in foreign policy. In D. Graber (Ed.) Media Power in Politics (pp.325–326). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. On the issues
    On the issues (2005, April20). The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Page, B. I. , Shapiro, R. Y. , & Dempsey, G. R.
    (1987) What moves public opinion?. American Political Science Review, 81, 23–43. doi: 10.2307/1960777
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1960777 [Google Scholar]
  42. Peters, J.
    (2009, February9). For supporters of gay marriage, a dashing of great expectations. The New York Times. Retrieved fromwww.lexisnexis.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/hottopics/lnacademic/
    [Google Scholar]
  43. ProCon.org
    ProCon.org. (n.d.). Should gay marriage be legal. Retrieved fromgaymarriage.procon.org/#arguments
  44. Ragas, M. W. , & Tran, H.
    (2013) Beyond cognitions A longitudinal study of online search salience and media coverage of the president. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90, 478–499. doi: 10.1177/1077699013493792
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013493792 [Google Scholar]
  45. Reese, S. D. , & Danielian, L. H.
    (1989) A closer look at intermedia influences in agenda setting: The cocaine issue of 1986. Communication campaigns about drugs: Government, media, and the public, 47–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rim, H. , Hong Ha, J. , & Kiousis, S.
    (2014) The evidence of compelling arguments in agenda building: Relationships among public information subsidies, media coverage, and risk perceptions during a pandemic outbreak. Journal of Communication Management, 18, 101–116. doi: 10.1108/JCOM‑05‑2012‑0044
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-05-2012-0044 [Google Scholar]
  47. Rogers, E. M. , & Chang, S.
    (1991) Media coverage of technology issues: Ethiopian drought of 1984, AIDS, Challenger, and Chernobyl. In L. Wilkens , & P. Paterson (Eds.), Risky business: Communicating issues of science, risk, and public policy (pp.75–96). New York: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Ryan, M.
    (2004) Framing the war against terrorism US newspaper editorials and military action in Afghanistan. Gazette, 66, 363–382. doi: 10.1177/0016549204045918
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549204045918 [Google Scholar]
  49. Schudson, M.
    (2002) The news media as political institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 249–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.111201.115816
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.111201.115816 [Google Scholar]
  50. Schwartz, J.
    (2011) Whose voices are heard? Gender, sexual orientation, and newspaper sources. Sex Roles, 64, 265–275. doi: 10.1007/s11199‑010‑9825‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9825-z [Google Scholar]
  51. Sigal, L. V.
    (1986) Who? Sources make the news. In R. K. Manoff , & M. Schudson (Eds.), Reading the news (pp.9–37). New York, NY: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sleurs, K. , & Jacobs, G.
    (2005) Beyond preformulation: an ethnographic perspective on press releases. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1251–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  53. Smith, C.
    (1993) News sources and power elites in news coverage of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70, 393–403. doi: 10.1177/107769909307000214
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000214 [Google Scholar]
  54. Soloski, J.
    (1989) Sources and channels of local news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 66, 864. doi: 10.1177/107769908906600413
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600413 [Google Scholar]
  55. Son, Y. J. , & Weaver, D. H.
    (2006) Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 2000 US election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 174–197. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh090
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh090 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tan, Y. , & Weaver, D. H.
    (2013) Agenda diversity and agenda setting from 1956 to 2004: What are the trends over time?Journalism Studies, 14, 773–789. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2012.748516
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.748516 [Google Scholar]
  57. Tichenor, P. J. , Donohue, G. A. , Olien, C. N. , & Clarke, P.
    (1980) Community conflict & the press. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Turk, J. V. , & Franklin, B.
    (1987) Information subsidies: Agenda-setting traditions. Public Relations Review, 13(4), 29–41. doi: 10.1016/S0363‑8111(87)80015‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(87)80015-2 [Google Scholar]
  59. US Supreme Court rules gay marriage is legal nationwide
    US Supreme Court rules gay marriage is legal nationwide (2015, Jane27). BBC. Retrieved fromwww.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33290341
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Winter, J. P. , & Eyal, C. H.
    (1981) Agenda setting for the civil right issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 376–383. doi: 10.1086/268671
    https://doi.org/10.1086/268671 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error