1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Using second-level agenda setting, this paper examines the coverage of Argentina’s 2009 media reform. To investigate the attributes the media used, data were collected from three national newspapers’ online publications (, and ). Results from the analysis suggest that the newspapers used different attributes and tone based on their political leanings. Content analysis before and after selected court’s rulings on the new media law demonstrate that and tended to converge in the way they used attributes and tone. When the rulings went against the interests of and , both newspapers reacted negatively, in tone and attribute, relative to .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/asj.17011.dem
2018-03-29
2019-08-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ACSL
    ACSL (2009) Ley de servicios de comunicación audiovisual 26.522 [Audiovisual Communication Services Law 26,522]. Retrieved fromwww.afsca.gob.ar/web/indice-de-la-ley.php.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Becerra, M.
    (2015) De la concentración mediática a la convergencia. Políticas de medios en Argentina y América Latina [From media concentration to convergence. Media policy in Argentina and Latin America]. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brosius, H. , & Kepplinger, H. M.
    (1990) The agenda-setting function of television news: Static and dynamic views. Communication Research, 17(2), 183–211. doi: 10.1177/009365090017002003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017002003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruschtein, L.
    (2012, November17). Democratruchos [Fake Democrats]. Página/12. Retrieved fromwww.pagina12.com.ar/diario/elpais/1-208045-2012-11-17.html
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, M. A. , & Hershberg, E.
    (2010) Latin America’s left turns: Politics, policies, and trajectories of change. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Carroll, C. E. , & McCombs, M.
    (2003) Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6, 36–46. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540188
    https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540188 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cocchi, H.
    (2010, August23). Clarín y La Nación confesaron en 1977 su complicidad con la dictadura [Clarín and La Nación confessed in 1977 their complicity with the dictatorship]. Tiempo Argentino. Retrieved fromtiempo.infonews.com/notas/clarin-y-nacion-confesaron-1977-su-complicidad-con-dictadura
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Craft, S. , & Wanta, W.
    (2004) US public concerns in the aftermath of 9–11: A test of second level agenda-setting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(4), 456–463. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edh039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh039 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Maio, M. , Alkazemi, M. , & Wanta, W.
    (2016) An examination of the Roman Catholic Church’s agenda-setting function in Argentina. Journal of Media and Religion, 15(1), 15–28. doi: 10.1080/15348423.2015.1131040
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2015.1131040 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eaton, H.
    (1989) Agenda-setting with bi-weekly data on content of three national media. Journalism Quarterly, 66(4), 942–948. doi: 10.1177/107769908906600427
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600427 [Google Scholar]
  11. El informe completo de Papel Prensa [The complete report about Papel Prensa] (2010, August26). Página/12. Retrieved fromwww.pagina12.com.ar/diario/ultimas/subnotas/20-48856-2010-08-26.html
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Entman, R. M. , Matthes, J. , & Pellicano, L.
    (2009) Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In T. Hanitzsch & K. Wahl-Jorgensen (Eds.), Handbook of journalism studies (pp.175–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Feintuck, M. & Varney, M.
    (2006) Media regulation, public interest and the law. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh. doi: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748621668.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748621668.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Galperin, H.
    (2002) Transforming television in Argentina. In Fox, E. , & Waisbord, S. R. (2002) Latin politics, global media (pp.22–37). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghanem, S.
    (1997) Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In M. McCombs , D. Shaw , & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy. Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Golan, G. , & Wanta, W.
    (2001) Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 247–259. doi: 10.1177/107769900107800203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800203 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gunther, R. and Mughan, A.
    (eds.) (2000) Democracy and the media: A comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139175289
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175289 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hove, T. , Paek, H. , Isaacson, T. , & Cole, R.
    (2012) Newspaper portrayals of child abuse: Frequency of coverage and frames of the issue. Mass Communication & Society, 10(1): 119–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Iyengar, S. & Simon, A.
    (1994) News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. In W. L. Bennett & D. Paletz (Eds.), Taken by storm (pp.167–185). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson, M. , Davis, J. and Cronin, S.
    (2009) Mexican expatriates vote? Framing and agenda setting in U.S. news coverage about Mexico. Mass Communication and Society, 12(1), 4–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, S. H. , Scheufele, D. A. , & Shanahan, J.
    (2002) Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public’s evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 7–25. doi: 10.1177/107769900207900102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900207900102 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kiousis, S. , Bantimaroudis, P. , & Ban, H.
    (1999) Candidate image attributes: Experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research, 26, 414–428. doi: 10.1177/009365099026004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lombard, M. , Snyder-Duch, J. , & Bracken, C. C.
    (2002) Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2002.tb00826.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x [Google Scholar]
  24. López-Escobar, E. , Llamas, J. P. , & McCombs, M.
    (1998) Agenda setting and community consensus: First and second level effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10(4), 335–348. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/10.4.335
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/10.4.335 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mauersberger, C.
    (2012) To be prepared when the time has come: Argentina’s new media regulation and the social movement for democratizing broadcasting. Media, Culture & Society, 34(5), 588–605. doi: 10.1177/0163443712442703
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712442703 [Google Scholar]
  26. McCombs, M.
    (1994) The future agenda for agenda setting research. Journal of Mass Communication Studies, 45, 181–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2004) Setting the agenda. The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. McCombs, M. & Ghanem, S. I.
    (2001) The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S. D. Reese , O. H. Gandy, Jr. , & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp.67–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McCombs, M. & Shaw, D. L.
    (1972) The agenda setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. doi: 10.1086/267990
    https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 [Google Scholar]
  30. McCombs, M. , Llamas, J. P. , Lopez-Escobar, E. , & Rey, F.
    (1997) Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717. doi: 10.1177/107769909707400404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400404 [Google Scholar]
  31. McCombs, M. , Lopez-Escobar, E. , & Llamas, J. P.
    (2000) Setting the Agenda of Attributes in the 1996 Spanish General Election. Journal of Communication, 50, 77–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2000.tb02842.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02842.x [Google Scholar]
  32. McCombs, M. , Shaw, D. & Weaver, D.
    (1997) Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Orlando, R.
    (2012) Medios privados y nuevos gobiernos en Ecuador y Argentina [Private media and new governments in Ecuador and Argentina.] Quito, Ecuador: FLACSO.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Peralta, G.
    (2010) La historia oculta del negocio del papel [The hidden history of the paper business]. Miradas al Sur. Retrieved fromsur.infonews.com/notas/la-historia-oculta-del-negocio-del-papel
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pressed
    Pressed (2010) The Economist. Retrieved fromwww.economist.com/blogs/americasview/2010/08/argentinas_media
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Repoll, J.
    (2010) Política y medios de comunicación en Argentina. Kirchner, Clarín y la Ley [Politics and communication media in Argentina. Kirchner, Clarín and the law.] Andamios, 7(14), 35–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Roberts, M. , Wanta, W. & Dzwo, T. H.
    (2002) Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 29(4), 452–465. doi: 10.1177/0093650202029004004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029004004 [Google Scholar]
  38. Santander, P.
    (2014) New media laws in South America: politically facing the media concentration. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 66, pp.13–37
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Segura, M. S.
    (2011) La sociedad civil y la democratización de las comunicaciones en la Argentina. La experiencia de la Coalición por una Radiodifusión Democrática [Civil Society and the democratization of communications in Argentina. The experience of the Coalition for a Democratic Broadcasting]. Argumentos, 13, 83–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Shah, D. , McLeod, D. M. , Gotlieb, M. , & Lee, N. J.
    (2009) Framing and agenda setting, In: R. L. Nabi and M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of media processes and effects, pp.83–98. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Shoemaker, P. J. , Wanta, W. , & Leggett, D.
    (1989) Drug coverage and public opinion. In P. J. Shoemaker (Ed.), Communication campaigns about drugs: Government, media, and the public (pp.67–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Smith, K. A.
    (1987) Newspaper coverage and public concern about community issues: A time-series analysis. Journalism Monographs, 101.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Stone, G. C. , & McCombs, M.
    (1981) Tracing the time lag in agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 51–55. doi: 10.1177/107769908105800108
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908105800108 [Google Scholar]
  44. Vialey, P. , Belinche, M. & Tovar, C.
    (2008) The media in Argentina: Democracy, crisis and the reconfiguration of media groups. In J. Lugo-Ocando (Ed.) The media in Latin America (pp.13–28). Berkshire, England: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Waisbord, S.
    (2011) Between support and confrontation: Civic society, media reform, and populism in Latin America. Communication, Culture & Critique, 4, 97–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1753‑9137.2010.01095.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01095.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Walgrave, S. , & Van Aelst, P.
    (2006) The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication, 56, 88–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2006.00005.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Wanta, W. , & Hu, Y. W.
    (1994) Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(3), 225–240. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/6.3.225
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/6.3.225 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wanta, W. , Golan, G. , Lee, C.
    (2004) Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 364–377. doi: 10.1177/107769900408100209
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900408100209 [Google Scholar]
  49. Warren, M.
    (2013) Argentine Supreme Court approves TV media limits, Associated Press. Retrieved frombigstory.ap.org/article/argentine-supreme-court-approves-limiting-tv-media
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Winter, J. P. , & Eyal, C. H.
    (1981) Agenda setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(3), 376–383. doi: 10.1086/268671
    https://doi.org/10.1086/268671 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu, H. D. , & Coleman, R.
    (2009) Advancing agenda-setting theory: The comparative strength and new contingent conditions of the two levels of agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(4), 775–789. doi: 10.1177/107769900908600404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600404 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/asj.17011.dem
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/asj.17011.dem
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agenda-setting , Argentina , Clarín , democracy , media conglomerates and media reform
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error