1887
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

For the past 50 years since the seminal agenda-setting study, scholars have continued to make strides in understanding the importance mass communication plays in public opinion formation. Although scholars have measured both first- and second-level agenda setting often using open-ended response, more close-ended measures might assist in measuring the theory, adding to the rich data. This experimental study directly compared open-ended responses shown to gauge an agenda-setting effect with close-ended responses to enhance the assessment of both first- and second-level agenda setting. The findings identified close-ended scales, including news salience, social salience, personal salience, and feelings salience, that add to the precision of measuring the salience of issues and attributes, indicating we have alternative measures to gauge agenda setting.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/asj.18012.kow
2019-01-02
2019-11-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D.
    (2002) Agenda setting and the ‘‘new’’ news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29, 180–207. 10.1177/0093650202029002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029002004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Benton, M., & Frazier, P. J.
    (1976) The agenda-setting function of the mass media at three levels of information holding. Communication Research, 3, 261–74. 10.1177/009365027600300302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300302 [Google Scholar]
  3. Carpentier, F. D.
    (2014) Agenda setting and priming effects based on information presentation: Revisiting accessibility as a mechanism explaining agenda setting and priming. Mass Communication & Society, 17(4), 531–552. 10.1080/15205436.2013.816744
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.816744 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chernov, G., Valenzuela, S., & McCombs, M.
    (2011) An experimental comparison of two perspectives on the concept of need for orientation in agenda-setting theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 142–155. 10.1177/107769901108800108
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800108 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, D.
    (1975, August). A report on a non-election agenda setting study. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism, Ottawa, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M.
    (1996) Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Einsiedel, E. F., Salomone, K. L., & Schneider, F.
    (1984) Crime: Effects of media exposure and personal experience on issue salience. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 131–136. 10.1177/107769908406100118
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908406100118 [Google Scholar]
  8. Evatt, D., & Ghanem, S.
    (2001, June). Building a scale to measure ‘salience.’ Paper presented atmeeting of the World Association for Public Opinion Research, Rome, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Golan, G., & Wanta, W.
    (2001) Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 247–259. 10.1177/107769900107800203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800203 [Google Scholar]
  10. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D.
    (1987) News that matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kiousis, S., & McCombs, M.
    (2004) Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength: Political figures during the 1996 presidential campaign. Communication Research, 31, 36–57. 10.1177/0093650203260205
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203260205 [Google Scholar]
  12. Matthes, J.
    (2006) The need for orientation toward news media: Revising and validating a classic concept. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 422–444. 10.1093/ijpor/edh118
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh118 [Google Scholar]
  13. McCombs, M.
    (2004) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Min, Y., Ghanem, S., & Evatt, D.
    (2007) Using a split-ballot survey to explore the robustness of the ‘MIP’ question in agenda-setting research: A methodological study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 221–236. 10.1093/ijpor/edm003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edm003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith, T.
    (1980) America’s most important problem – a trend analysis, 1946–1976. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 164–180. 10.1086/268582
    https://doi.org/10.1086/268582 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1985) The polls: America’s most important problems. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 264–274. 10.1086/268922
    https://doi.org/10.1086/268922 [Google Scholar]
  17. Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S.
    (2010) A new look at agenda-setting effects – Comparing the predictive power of overall political news consumption and specific news media consumption across different media channels and media types. Journal of Communication, 60, 271–292. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2010.01482.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01482.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Stroud, N. J., & Kenski, K.
    (2007) From agenda setting to refusal setting: Survey non-responsive as a function of media coverage across the 2004 election cycle. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(4), 539–559. 10.1093/poq/nfm042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm042 [Google Scholar]
  19. Takeshita, T., & Mikami, S.
    (1976) How did mass media influence the voters’ choice in the 1993 general election in Japan?: A study of agenda setting. Keio Communication Review, 17, 27–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Valenzuela, S., & McCombs, M.
    (2009) The agenda-setting role of the news media. InD. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (Second Edition) (pp.90–105). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, T.
    (2000) Agenda-setting online. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 15(2), 59–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Weaver, D., Graber, D., McCombs, M., & Eyal, C.
    (1981) Media agenda setting in a presidential election: Issues, images and interest. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/asj.18012.kow
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/asj.18012.kow
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error