1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study is a mixed-method quantitative and qualitative content analysis that examined the overlapping presence of agendamelding theory and in-group out-group formation on the social media platform Reddit. The study looked at the top 10 posts for one month ( = 310) on the pro-Donald Trump subreddit /r/The_Donald. The results show that media choice was used to prove membership to the in-group, often by derogating the media used by the out-group. Specific patterns emerged within the derogative language as well. Links to left-wing and neutral news media sites were often commented on and criticized, while the content of the linked news article was ignored or changed. Right-wing news media sites, which were used as news sources rather than commentary, were typically posted without changes, unlike neutral news media sites, which were often posted in a mocking manner. As agendamelding suggests, participants sought to avoid dissonance by posting media to fit within the community.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/asj.18017.ril
2018-11-13
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexa Top Sites Data
    Alexa Top Sites Data (2018) Retrieved fromhttps://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/US
  2. Appiah, O., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Alter, S.
    (2013) Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: Effects of news valence, character race, and recipient race on selective news reading. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 517–534. 10.1111/jcom.12032
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12032 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brewer, M. B.
    (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307. 10.1037/0033‑2909.86.2.307
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B.
    (2009) Media effects: Advances in theory and research (Third). New York: Routledge. 10.1177/02673231100250020505
    https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231100250020505 [Google Scholar]
  5. Camaj, L.
    (2014) Need for orientation, selective exposure, and attribute agenda-setting effects. Mass Communication and Society, 17(5), 689–712. 10.1080/15205436.2013.835424
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.835424 [Google Scholar]
  6. Camaj, L., & Weaver, D. H.
    (2013) Need for orientation and attribute agenda-setting during a US election campaign. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1442–1463.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang, A.
    (2017, May18). We tracked the Trump scandals on right-wing news sites. Here’s how they covered it. Retrieved fromhttps://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/5/18/15646098/right-wing-media-collective-memories
  8. Chernov, G., Valenzuela, S., & McCombs, M.
    (2011) An experimental comparison of two perspectives on the concept of need for orientation in agenda-setting theory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 142–155. 10.1177/107769901108800108
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800108 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, B.
    (1963) The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dewey, C.
    (2016, July20). The people running this Trump fan club also promote eugenics and call Muslims ‘animals’. Retrieved fromhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/07/20/the-people-running-reddits-largest-trump-club-also-promote-eugenics-and-call-muslims-animals/?utm_term=.36874561d9d3
  11. Douglas, W., & Washburn, M.
    (2016, December6). Religious zeal drives N.C. man in “Pizzagate.”Retrieved fromwww.courier-tribune.com/news/20161206/religious-zeal-drives-nc-man-in-8216pizzagate8217
  12. Eendebak, L., Boiten, M., Krouwel, A. M., & Prooijen, J. v.
    (2015) Fear among the extremes: how political ideology predicts negative emotions and outgroup derogation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, (4), 485.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Festinger, L.
    (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, III.: Row, Peterson.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Francis, N.
    (2018, February24). Reddit refuses to act as The_Donald continues to attack school shooting victims, so advertisers take action. Retrieved fromhttps://www.inquisitr.com/4800769/reddit-refuses-to-act-as-the_donald-continues-to-attack-school-shooting-victims-so-advertisers-take-action/
  15. Gilmour, D.
    (2017, May19). 4chan and Reddit users set out to prove Seth Rich murder conspiracy. Retrieved fromhttps://www.dailydot.com/layer8/reddit-the-donald-4chan-seth-rich-murder/
  16. Guo, L., Vu, H. T., & McCombs, M.
    (2012) An expanded perspective on agenda-setting effects. exploring the third level of agenda setting Una extensión de la perspectiva de los efectos de la Agenda Setting. Explorando. Revista de Comunicación, 11, 51.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M.
    (2013) Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 154–174. 10.1111/jcc4.12001
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kang, C.
    (2017, December22). Fake news onslaught targets pizzeria as nest of child-trafficking. The New York Times. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nytimes.com​/2016​/​11​/21​/technology​/fact​-check​-this​-pizzeria​-is​-not​-a​-child​-trafficking​-site.html
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Koebler, J.
    (2016, July12). How r/the_donald became a melting pot of frustration and hate. Retrieved fromhttps://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/53d5xb/what-is-rthedonald-donald-trump-subreddit
  20. Lee, D.
    (2018, March02). Reddit dragged into Russian propaganda row. Retrieved fromwww.bbc.com/news/technology-43255285
  21. Lippmann, W. [Google Scholar]
  22. Martin, T.
    (2017, December19). Dissecting Trump’s most rabid online following. 10.1086/213442
    https://doi.org/10.1086/213442 [Google Scholar]
  23. McCombs, M.
    (2005) A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. 10.1080/14616700500250438
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2014) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L.
    (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. 10.1086/267990
    https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 [Google Scholar]
  26. Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., & Matsa, K. E.
    (2014, October21). Political polarization & media habits. Retrieved fromwww.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/
  27. n/a (2017, October2). “Archive.is everything! Tweets, Facebook whatever of celebrities, news etc so when they want to delete or backtrack the internet never forgets.” Message posted to /r/The_Donald.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Noel, J. G., Wann, D. L., & Branscombe, N. R.
    (1995) Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 127–137. 10.1037/0022‑3514.68.1.127
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.127 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nichols, A.
    (2017, May24). A guide to conservative publications. Retrieved fromhttps://theoutline.com/post/1558/a-guide-to-conservative-publications?zd=1&zi=5s5fsurn
  30. Ohlheiser, A.
  31. Reddit Metrics
    Reddit Metrics (2018) Retrieved fromredditmetrics.com/r/the_donald
  32. Reisinger, D.
    (2009, January28). Best political sites: Liberal, conservative, and nonpartisan. Retrieved fromhttps://www.cnet.com/how-to/best-political-sites-liberal-conservative-and-nonpartisan/
  33. Scheufele, D. A.
    (2000) Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2–3), 297–316. 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07 [Google Scholar]
  34. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D.
    (2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Shaw, D. L., McCombs, M., Weaver, D. H., & Hamm, B. J.
    (1999) Individuals, groups, and geanda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11(1), 2. 10.1093/ijpor/11.1.2
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.1.2 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sherif, M.
    (1961) Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment (Vol.10, pp.150–198). Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith, C. & H.
    (2018, March25). 71 Amazing Reddit statistics. Retrieved fromhttps://expandedramblings.com/index.php/reddit-stats/
  38. Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L.
    (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 296–316. 10.1111/jcom.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12089 [Google Scholar]
  39. Vu, H. T., Guo, L., & McCombs, M. E.
    (2014) Exploring “the world outside and the pictures in our heads” A network agenda-setting study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(4), 669–686. 10.1177/1077699014550090
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699014550090 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wyrich, A.
    (2017, October03). How Trump’s biggest fans responded before and after learning the Las Vegas shooter was white. Retrieved fromhttps://www.dailydot.com/layer8/las-vegas-false-flag-reddit-the_donald/
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/asj.18017.ril
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/asj.18017.ril
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agendamelding , content analysis , digital communities , in-group out-group , reddit and social media
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error