1887
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Generating public consensus on issue priorities is one of the most important functions of news agenda setting. However, the nature of that consensus is not well understood. Agenda setting might build a public consensus focused on a limited set of priorities, but it also has potential to build a consensus that broadens the public’s issue agenda by generating shared concerns about problems beyond the bounds of personal experience. Evidence shows that from 1968–2010, broadcast news’ agenda-setting effect tended to broaden the public agenda rather than focus it. This tendency of news agenda setting to broaden the public agenda is not affected by the news agenda’s breadth or by which issues dominate the news, although issue-level agenda setting effects may, under some circumstances, focus the public agenda. If broadcast news does not focus the public agenda, it is unlikely a focused agenda will be generated by a more fragmented media ecology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/asj.18026.mei
2019-09-25
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chaffee, S. H., & Wilson, D. G.
    (1977) Media rich, media poor: Two studies of diversity in agenda-holding. Journalism Quarterly, 54(3), 466–476. 10.1177/107769907705400304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907705400304 [Google Scholar]
  2. Chiang, C.
    (1995) Bridging and closing the gap of our society: Social function of media agenda setting. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
  3. Culbertson, H. M.
    (1992) Measuring agenda diversity in an elastic medium: Candidate position papers. Journalism Quarterly69(4), 938–946. 10.1177/107769909206900413
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900413 [Google Scholar]
  4. Du, Y. R., & Wong, J.
    (2013) Greater newspaper use increases agreement on public issues. Newspaper Research Journal, 34(3), 60–71. 10.1177/073953291303400305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/073953291303400305 [Google Scholar]
  5. Edy, J. A. & Meirick, P. C.
    (2018) The Fragmenting Public Agenda: Diversity and Volatility in Responses to the “Most Important Problem” Question. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(4), 661–685. 10.1093/poq/nfy043
    https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy043 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2019) A nation fragmented: The public agenda in the information age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Garrow, D. J.
    (1978) Protest at Selma: Martin Luther King Jr., and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. New Haven: CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gottfried, J. & Shearer, E.
    (2017) Americans’ online news use is closing in on TV news use. Pew Research Center, September7 2017 www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/07/americans-online-news-use-vs-tv-news-use/ (accessed19 September 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lippmann, W.
    (1922) Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lopez-Escobar, E., Llamas, J. P., & McCombs, M.
    (1998) Agenda setting and community consensus: First and second level effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 10 (4), 335–348. 10.1093/ijpor/10.4.335
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/10.4.335 [Google Scholar]
  11. McCombs, M.
    (1997) Building consensus: The news media’s agenda-setting roles. Political Communication, 14(4), 433–443. 10.1080/105846097199236
    https://doi.org/10.1080/105846097199236 [Google Scholar]
  12. McCombs, M., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H.
    (2014) New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society, 17(6), 781–802. 10.1080/15205436.2014.964871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.964871 [Google Scholar]
  13. McCombs, M., & Zhu, J. H.
    (1995) Capacity, diversity, and volatility of the public agenda: Trends from 1954 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(4), 495–525. 10.1086/269491
    https://doi.org/10.1086/269491 [Google Scholar]
  14. Neuman, W. R.
    (1990) The threshold of public attention. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54(2), 159–176. 10.1086/269194
    https://doi.org/10.1086/269194 [Google Scholar]
  15. Peter, J., & De Vreese, C. H.
    (2003) Agenda-rich, agenda-poor: A cross-national comparative investigation of nominal and thematic public agenda diversity. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(1), 44–64. 10.1093/ijpor/15.1.44
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/15.1.44 [Google Scholar]
  16. Prior, M.
    (2007) Post broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139878425
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878425 [Google Scholar]
  17. Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W.
    (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Shaw, D. L., & Martin, S. E.
    (1992) The function of mass media agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 902–920. 10.1177/107769909206900410
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900410 [Google Scholar]
  19. Shaw, D. & Weaver, D.
    (2014) Media agenda-setting and audience agenda-melding. InM. E. McCombs, Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (pp.145–150). (2nd Ed.) Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tan, Y. & Weaver, D. H.
    (2013) Agenda diversity and agenda setting: What are the trends over time?Journalism Studies, 14(6), 773–789. 10.1080/1461670X.2012.748516
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.748516 [Google Scholar]
  21. Uscinski, J.
    (2012) TV news policy agenda data (dataset). Retrieved fromwww.policyagendas.org/page/additional-datasets
  22. Uscinski, J. E.
    (2014) The people’s news: Media, politics, and the demands of capitalism. New York: New York University Press. 10.18574/nyu/9780814760338.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814760338.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M. & Shaw, D. L.
    (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 296–316. doi:  10.1111/jcom.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12089 [Google Scholar]
  24. Wanta, W. & Hu, Y.
    (1993) The agenda-setting effects of international news coverage: An examination of differing news frames. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5(3), 250–264. 10.1093/ijpor/5.3.250
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/5.3.250 [Google Scholar]
  25. Weaver, D., McCombs, M. & Shaw, D. L.
    (2004) “Agenda-Setting Research: Issues, Attributes, and Influences.” InL. L. Kaid (Ed.) Handbook of Political Communication Research (pp.257–282), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Webster, J. G.
    (2014) The marketplace of attention: How audiences take shape in the digital age. Boston: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9892.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9892.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhu, J. H.
    (1992) Issue competition and attention distraction: A zero-sum theory of agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 825–836. 10.1177/107769909206900403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909206900403 [Google Scholar]
  28. Zucker, H. G.
    (1978) The variable nature of news media influence. InB. D. Ruben (Ed.) Communication Yearbook No. 2. New Brunswick: Transaction, pp.225–245.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/asj.18026.mei
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/asj.18026.mei
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error