1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines how agenda setting works on social media in the United States. Unlike previous platform studies, this research seeks to examine not just if, but also how agenda setting works in a social media setting. Three areas were tested for their effect on issue salience: repetition, story order, and endorsement. More than 360 U.S. participants viewed variations of a mock Facebook feed and answered questions about issue importance. Using issue importance as the dependent variable and repetition, story order, and endorsement as the independent variables, three hypotheses were tested. One hypothesis had the effect predicted: Increased repetition of a news story topic did influence participants’ perception that the news story topic was important. Additional items were tested as covariates. Gender, and ethnicity had a significant influence on perceived story importance. The results of this study indicate that agenda setting on social media occurs through repetition. Implications are explored.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/asj.19001.cow
2020-09-02
2020-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Althaus, S. L., & Tewksbury, D.
    (2002) Agenda setting and the “new” news patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times. Communication Research, 29(2), 180–207. 10.1177/0093650202029002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029002004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong, C. L., & Gao, F.
    (2010) Now Tweet This How News Organizations Use Twitter. Electronic News, 4(4), 218–235. 10.1177/1931243110389457
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1931243110389457 [Google Scholar]
  3. Benesch, C.
    (2012) An empirical analysis of the gender gap in news consumption. Journal of Media Economics, 25(3), 147–167. 10.1080/08997764.2012.700976
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08997764.2012.700976 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R.
    (2000) Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks, B., Kennedy, G., Moen, D. R., & Ranly, D.
    (2010) Telling the Story: The Convergence of Print, Broadcast and Online Media (Fourth). Bedford St. Martin.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruns, A., & Burgess, J.
    (2012) Researching news discussion on Twitter: New methodologies. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 801–814. 10.1080/1461670X.2012.664428
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664428 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen, B.
    (1963) The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. comScore Ranks the Top 50 U.S. Digital Media Properties for February 2016
    comScore Ranks the Top 50 U.S. Digital Media Properties for February 2016 (2016, March21). RetrievedDecember 16, 2016, fromwww.comscore.com/Insights/Rankings/comScore-Ranks-the-Top-50-US-Digital-Media-Properties-for-February-2016
  9. Cohen, J.
    (1992) Statistical Power Analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. doi:  10.1111/1467‑8721.ep10768783
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783 [Google Scholar]
  10. Conway, B.
    (2015, February27). Why do we care about the colour of the dress?The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/27/colour-dress-optical-illusion-social-media
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Conway, M., & Patterson, J. R.
    (2008) Today’s Top Story? An Agenda-Setting and Recall Experiment Involving Television and Internet News. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 24(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Funkhouser, G. R.
    (1973) The issues of the sixties: An exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(1), 62–75. 10.1086/268060
    https://doi.org/10.1086/268060 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gebel, M.
    (2019, February4). In 15 years Facebook has amassed 2.3 billion users – more than followers of Christianity. RetrievedJuly 9, 2019, from Business Insider website: https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-has-2-billion-plus-users-after-15-years-2019-2
  14. Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A.
    (2011) Hit, Link, Like and Share. Organizing the social and the fabric of the web in a Like economy. (Vol.24, p.25). Paper presented at theDMI mini-conference.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2013) The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 1461444812472322. 10.1177/1461444812472322
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472322 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R.
    (2003) Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Paper presented at theMidwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Columbus, OH. Retrieved fromhttps://scholarworks.iupui.edu/handle/1805/344
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Graber, D. A.
    (1988) Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. University Press of Amer.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D.
    (2012) Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 815–824. 10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hess, A. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hong, S.
    (2012) Online news on Twitter: Newspapers’ social media adoption and their online readership. Information Economics and Policy, 24(1), 69–74. doi:  10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.01.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ingram, Matthew
    (2015, August18). Facebook now drives more traffic to media sites than Google. Fortune. fortune.com/2015/08/18/facebook-google/
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R.
    (1987) News that matters: agenda setting and priming in a television age. News That Matters: Agenda-Setting and Priming in a Television Age.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Johnson, B. K.
    (2014) Selective Exposure for Better or Worse: Its Mediating Role for Online News’ Impact on Political Participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 184–196. doi:  10.1111/jcc4.12036
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12036 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kulwin, N.
    (2016, February18). Why BuzzFeed Is “All-In” on Facebook Instant Articles, and Why the New York Times Is Not (Video). RetrievedJanuary 19, 2017, fromwww.recode.net/2016/2/18/11588006/why-buzzfeed-is-all-in-on-facebook-instant-articles-and-why-the-new
  25. Lippmann, W. [Google Scholar]
  26. Maier, S.
    (2010) All the news fit to post? Comparing news content on the web to newspapers, television, and radio. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3–4), 548–562. 10.1177/107769901008700307
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901008700307 [Google Scholar]
  27. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L.
    (1972) The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. doi:  10.1086/267990
    https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 [Google Scholar]
  28. McCombs, M.
    (1997) Building consensus: The news media’s agenda-setting roles. Political Communication, 14(4), 433–443. 10.1080/105846097199236
    https://doi.org/10.1080/105846097199236 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2014) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Meraz, S.
    (2009) Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682–707. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2009.01458.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x [Google Scholar]
  31. (2011a) The fight for ‘how to think’: Traditional media, social networks, and issue interpretation. Journalism, 12(1), 107–127. 10.1177/1464884910385193
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910385193 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2011b) Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 176–194. 10.1177/107769901108800110
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800110 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2014) Media Agenda Setting in a Competitive and Hostile Environment. InAgenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New Agendas in Communication. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Messner, M., & DiStaso, M. W.
    (2008) The source cycle: How traditional media and weblogs use each other as sources. Journalism Studies, 9(3), 447–463. 10.1080/14616700801999287
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700801999287 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mitchell, A., Stocking, G., & Matsa, K. E.
    (2016, May5). Long-Form Reading Shows Signs of Life in Our Mobile News World. RetrievedMay 9, 2016, fromwww.journalism.org/2016/05/05/long-form-reading-shows-signs-of-life-in-our-mobile-news-world/
  36. Mondak, J. J., & Anderson, M. R.
    (2004) The knowledge gap: A reexamination of gender-based differences in political knowledge. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 492–512. 10.1111/j.1468‑2508.2004.00161.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00161.x [Google Scholar]
  37. News consumption among African Americans and Hispanics
    News consumption among African Americans and Hispanics (2014, September16). RetrievedJuly 25, 2019, from American Press Institute website: https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/news-consumption-patterns-african-americans-hispanics/
  38. Owen, L. H.
    (2015, November30). “Why not be all the way in?” How publishers are using Facebook Instant Articles. RetrievedJanuary 19, 2017, fromwww.niemanlab.org/2015/11/why-not-be-all-the-way-in-how-publishers-are-using-facebook-instant-articles/
  39. Perrin, A.
    (2015, October8). Social Media Usage: 2005–2015. RetrievedMay 10, 2016, fromwww.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/social-networking-usage-2005-2015/
  40. Pew Research Center
    Pew Research Center (2004, June8). Pew Research Center Biennial News Consumption Survey: Online News Audience Larger, More Diverse. RetrievedDecember 19, 2019, fromhttps://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/legacy-pdf/215.pdf
  41. Roth, S. P., Tuch, A. N., Mekler, E. D., Bargas-Avila, J. A., & Opwis, K.
    (2013) Location matters, especially for non-salient features–An eye-tracking study on the effects of web object placement on different types of websites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(3), 228–235. doi:  10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Scacco, J. M., & Muddiman, A.
    (2016) Investigating the Influence of “Clickbait” News Headlines. RetrievedJuly 30, 2019, from Center for Media Engagement website: https://mediaengagement.org/research/clickbait-headlines/
  43. Schiffer, A. J.
    (2006) Blogswarms and press norms: News coverage of the Downing Street memo controversy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(3), 494–510. 10.1177/107769900608300302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300302 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shaw, D. L., & McCombs, M. E.
    (1977) The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press. West Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Shearer, E., & Gottfried, J.
    (2018, September10). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2018 | Pew Research Center. RetrievedJune 14, 2019, fromhttps://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/
  46. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930434 [Google Scholar]
  47. Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T.
    (2009) Gatekeeping theory. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203931653
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203931653 [Google Scholar]
  48. Stelter, B.
    (2008, March 27). Finding Political News Online, the Young Pass It On. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/us/politics/27voters.html
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stroud, N. J. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755509.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C.
    (2001) Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 52–72. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2001.tb02872.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Tewksbury, D., & Althaus, S. L.
    (2000) Differences in knowledge acquisition among readers of the paper and online versions of a national newspaper. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 457–479. doi:  10.1177/107769900007700301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700301 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tran, H.
    (2013) Online Agenda Setting: A New Frontier for Theory Development. InAgenda Setting in a 2.0 World: New agendas in communication. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wallsten, K.
    (2007) Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An analysis of the relationship between mainstream media and political blogs. Review of Policy Research, 24(6), 567–587. 10.1111/j.1541‑1338.2007.00300.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00300.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Weaver, D. H.
    (1980) Audience Need for Orientation and Media Effects. Communication Research, 7(3), 361–373. doi:  10.1177/009365028000700305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365028000700305 [Google Scholar]
  55. Westbrook, R. B.
    (1993) An Innocent Abroad? John Dewey and International Politics. Ethics & International Affairs, 7(1), 203–221. doi:  10.1111/j.1747‑7093.1993.tb00150.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.1993.tb00150.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Wong, D.
    (2013, December 10). [Report] Facebook Referrals Skyrocket: up 170% in past year. RetrievedJuly 28, 2016, fromhttps://blog.shareaholic.com/facebook-referrals-skyrocket-12-2013/
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/asj.19001.cow
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/asj.19001.cow
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agenda-setting theory , mass media , online communication , online news , platform research and social media
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error