1887
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study systematically reviewed empirical intermedia agenda setting (IAS) research published between 1997 and 2019, in terms of the level of agenda-setting, the methodologies – including the coding strategies and time-series analytical techniques – the types of media, and the flow of IAS effects. According to our results, previous IAS studies exhibited the following trends: (1) an overwhelming majority of the IAS studies was anchored by the first agenda-setting level, whilst examinations of the NAS model and multiple levels have increased in recent years; (2) excessive IAS studies performed content analyses, (3) applied manual coding strategies, (4) conducted cross-lagged correlation analyses to examine time-series effects, (5) and focused on newspapers and Twitter; (6) most IAS research confirmed the flow from one traditional media to another traditional media, whereas more recent studies also revealed the flow from traditional to emerging media, and their reciprocal relationship; (7) the majority of IAS studies confirmed the elite-to-non-elite flow of IAS effects. Based on these findings, this study encourages futures IAS researchers to attach more importance to (1) contextual diversity, (2) balanced examinations of each agenda-setting level, (3) methodological innovations, (4) technological pluralism, and (5) providing more evidence for the flow of IAS effects across different types of media.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/asj.20001.su
2021-01-18
2021-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ader, C. R.
    (1995) A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 300–311. 10.1177/107769909507200204
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200204 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baruh, L. , Secinti, E. , & Cemalcilar, Z.
    (2017) Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 26–53. 10.1111/jcom.12276
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12276 [Google Scholar]
  3. Benton, M. , & Frazier, P. J.
    (1976) The agenda setting function of the mass media at three levels of “information holding.” Communication Research, 3, 261–274. 10.1177/009365027600300302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300302 [Google Scholar]
  4. Borah, P.
    (2017) Emerging communication technology research: Theoretical and methodological variables in the last 16 years and future directions. New Media & Society, 19(4), 616–636. 10.1177/1461444815621512
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621512 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boumans, J. W. , & Trilling, D.
    (2016) Taking stock of the toolkit: An overview of relevant automated content analysis approaches and techniques for digital journalism scholars. Digital Journalism, 4(1), 8–23. 10.1080/21670811.2015.1096598
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1096598 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyle, T. P.
    (2001) Intermedia Agenda Setting in the 1996 Presidential Election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(1), 26–44. 10.1177/107769900107800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800103 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ceron, A. , Curini, L. , & Iacus, S. M.
    (2016) First- and second-level agenda setting in the Twittersphere: An application to the Italian political debate. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 13(2), 159–174. 10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chomsky, N.
    (1997) What makes mainstream media mainstream. Z magazine, 10(10), 17–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, J.
    (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37–46. 10.1177/001316446002000104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 [Google Scholar]
  10. Conway, B. A. , Kenski, K. , & Wang, D.
    (2015) The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380. 10.1111/jcc4.12124
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124 [Google Scholar]
  11. Craft, S. , & Wanta, W.
    (2004) US public concerns in the aftermath of 9–11: A test of second level agenda-setting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(4), 456–463. 10.1093/ijpor/edh039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh039 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dearing, J. W. , & Rogers, E. M.
    (1996) Communication concepts 6: Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Denham, B. E.
    (2014) Intermedia attribute agenda setting in the New York Times. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(1), 17–37. 10.1177/1077699013514415
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013514415 [Google Scholar]
  14. Denyer, D. , & Tranfield, D.
    (2009) Producing a systematic review. The Sage handbook of organizational research methods, 671–689.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Farhi, P.
    (2009) The Twitter explosion: whether they are reporting about it, finding sources on it or urging viewers, listeners and readers to follow them on it, journalists just can’t seem to get enough of the social networking service. Just how effective is it as a journalism tool?. American Journalism Review, 31(3), 26–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gan, C.
    (2018) Gratifications for using social media: A comparative analysis of Sina Weibo and WeChat in China. Information Development, 34(2), 139–147. 10.1177/0266666916679717
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916679717 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gitlin, T.
    (1980) The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Golan, G.
    (2006) Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage: Assessing the influence of the New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 323–333. 10.1080/14616700500533643
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500533643 [Google Scholar]
  19. Golan, G. , & Wanta, W.
    (2001) Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 247–259. 10.1177/107769900107800203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900107800203 [Google Scholar]
  20. Groshek, J. , & Groshek, M. C.
    (2013) Agenda trending: Reciprocity and the predictive capacity of social networking sites in intermedia agenda setting across topics over time. Media and Communication, 1(1), 15–27. 10.17645/mac.v1i1.71
    https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.71 [Google Scholar]
  21. Guo, L. , Chen, Y. N. K. , Vu, H. , Wang, Q. , Aksamit, R. , Guzek, D. , … & McCombs, M.
    (2015) Coverage of the Iraq War in the United States, Mainland China, Taiwan and Poland: A transnational network agenda-setting study. Journalism Studies, 16(3), 343–362. 10.1080/1461670X.2014.885198
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.885198 [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo, L. , Mays, K. , & Wang, J.
    (2019) Whose Story Wins on Twitter? Visualizing the South China Sea dispute. Journalism Studies, 20(4), 563–584. 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1399813
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1399813 [Google Scholar]
  23. Guo, L. , & McCombs, M.
    (2011) Network agenda setting: a third level of media effects. Paper presented to theInternational Communication Association, Boston, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Guo, L. , & Vargo, C. J.
    (2017) Global intermedia agenda setting: A big data analysis of international news flow. Journal of Communication, 67(4), 499–520. 10.1111/jcom.12311
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12311 [Google Scholar]
  25. Haim, M. , Weimann, G. , & Brosius, H. B.
    (2018) Who sets the cyber agenda? Intermedia agenda-setting online: The case of Edward Snowden’s NSA revelations. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1(2), 277–294. 10.1007/s42001‑018‑0016‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-018-0016-y [Google Scholar]
  26. Heim, K.
    (2013) Framing the 2008 Iowa democratic caucuses: Political blogs and second-level intermedia agenda setting. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(3), 500–519. 10.1177/1077699013493785
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013493785 [Google Scholar]
  27. Huckins, K.
    (1999) Interest-group influence on the media agenda: A case study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 76–86. 10.1177/107769909907600106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909907600106 [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson, T. J. , Braima, M. A. , & Sothirajah, J.
    (1999) Doing the traditional media sidestep: Comparing the effects of the Internet and other nontraditional media with traditional media in the 1996 presidential campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76(1), 99–123. 10.1177/107769909907600108
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909907600108 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jørgensen, C. R.
    (2015) Three advantages of cross-national comparative ethnography–methodological reflections from a study of migrants and minority ethnic youth in English and Spanish schools. Ethnography and Education, 10(1), 1–16. 10.1080/17457823.2014.922891
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2014.922891 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jungherr, A.
    (2014) The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and content. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 239–259. 10.1111/jcom.12087
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12087 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kawamoto, K.
    (Ed.) (2003) Digital journalism: Emerging media and the changing horizons of journalism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, Y. , Gonzenbach, W. J. , Vargo, C. J. , & Kim, Y.
    (2016) First and second levels of intermedia agenda setting: Political advertising, newspapers, and Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4550.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, Y. , Kim, Y. , & Zhou, S.
    (2017) Theoretical and methodological trends of agenda-setting theory: A thematic analysis of the last four decades. The Agenda Setting Journal, 1, 5–22. 10.1075/asj.1.1.03kim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.1.1.03kim [Google Scholar]
  34. Kiousis, S. , Mitrook, M. , Wu, X. , & Seltzer, T.
    (2006) First-and second-level agenda-building and agenda-setting effects: Exploring the linkages among candidate news releases, media coverage, and public opinion during the 2002 Florida gubernatorial election. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(3), 265–285. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1803_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1803_4 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kruikemeier, S. , Gattermann, K. , & Vliegenthart, R.
    (2018) Understanding the dynamics of politicians’ visibility in traditional and social media. The Information Society, 34(4), 215–228. 10.1080/01972243.2018.1463334
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1463334 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ku, G. , Kaid, L. L. , & Pfau, M.
    (2003) The impact of web site campaigning on traditional news media and public information processing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 528–547. 10.1177/107769900308000304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000304 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, J. , & Xu, W.
    (2018) The more attacks, the more retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s agenda setting on Twitter. Public Relations Review, 44(2), 201–213. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lim, J.
    (2011) First-level and second-level intermedia agenda-setting among major news websites. Asian Journal of Communication, 21(2), 167–185. 10.1080/01292986.2010.539300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2010.539300 [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, X. , Vedlitz, A. , & Alston, L.
    (2008) Regional news portrayals of global warming and climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(5), 379–393. 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  40. Luo, Y.
    (2013) Mapping agenda-setting research in China: a meta-analysis study. Chinese Journal of Communication, 6(3), 269–285. 10.1080/17544750.2013.789426
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2013.789426 [Google Scholar]
  41. Luo, Y. , Burley, H. , Moe, A. , & Sui, M.
    (2019) A meta-analysis of news media’s public agenda-setting effects, 1972–2015. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 150–172. 10.1177/1077699018804500
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018804500 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mahrt, M. , & Scharkow, M.
    (2013) The value of big data in digital media research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1), 20–33. 10.1080/08838151.2012.761700
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.761700 [Google Scholar]
  43. McCombs, M. E.
    (2004) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, UK: Polity
    [Google Scholar]
  44. McCombs, M. , Llamas, J. P. , Lopez-Escobar, E. , & Rey, F.
    (1997) Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 703–717. 10.1177/107769909707400404
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400404 [Google Scholar]
  45. McCombs, M. E. , & Shaw, D. L.
    (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. 10.1086/267990
    https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 [Google Scholar]
  46. McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. H.
    (2014) New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass communication and society, 17(6), 781–802. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.964871
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Meraz, S.
    (2009) Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682–707. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2009.01458.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x [Google Scholar]
  48. (2011) Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 176–194. 10.1177/107769901108800110
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800110 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2016) An expanded perspective on network agenda setting between traditional media and twitter political discussion groups in ‘everyday political talk’. In L. Guo & M. McCombs (Ed.), The Power of Information Networks (pp.66–87). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Neuman, W. R. , Guggenheim, L. , Jang, S. M. , & Bae, S. Y.
    (2014) The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 193–214. 10.1111/jcom.12088
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088 [Google Scholar]
  51. Nisbet, M. C. , & Lewenstein, B. V.
    (2002) Biotechnology and the American Media: The Policy Process and the Elite Press, 1970 to 1999. Science Communication, 23(4), 359–391. 10.1177/107554700202300401
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107554700202300401 [Google Scholar]
  52. Noar, S. M. , Francis, D. B. , Bridges, C. , Sontag, J. M. , Brewer, N. T. , & Ribisl, K. M.
    (2017) Effects of strengthening cigarette pack warnings on attention and message processing: A systematic review. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(2), 416–442. 10.1177/1077699016674188
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016674188 [Google Scholar]
  53. Paulussen, S. , & Harder, R. A.
    (2014) Social media references in newspapers: Facebook, Twitter and YouTube as sources in newspaper journalism. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 542–551. 10.1080/17512786.2014.894327
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.894327 [Google Scholar]
  54. Perrin, A. , & Anderson, M.
    (2019) Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018. Retrieved fromhttps://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/
  55. Protess, D. L. , & McCombs, M.
    (1991) Agenda Setting: Readings on Media. InPublic Opinion, and Policymaking. Hillsdale, NJ.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ragas, M. W. , & Kiousis, S.
    (2010) Intermedia agenda-setting and political activism: MoveOn.org and the 2008 Presidential Election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 560–583. 10.1080/15205436.2010.515372
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.515372 [Google Scholar]
  57. Reese, S. D. , & Danielian, L. H.
    (1989) Intermedia influence and the drug issue: converging on cocaine. In Shoemaker, P. (Ed), Communication Campaigns about Drugs: Government, Media, and the Public, (pp.29–45). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Roberts, M. , & McCombs, M.
    (1994) Agenda setting and political advertising: Origins of the news agenda. Political Communication, 11(3), 249–262. 10.1080/10584609.1994.9963030
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1994.9963030 [Google Scholar]
  59. Roberts, M. , Wanta, W. , & Dzwo, T. H.
    (2002) Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research, 29(4), 452–465. 10.1177/0093650202029004004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029004004 [Google Scholar]
  60. Rogstad, I.
    (2016) Is Twitter just rehashing? Intermedia agenda setting between Twitter and mainstream media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(2), 142–158. 10.1080/19331681.2016.1160263
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160263 [Google Scholar]
  61. Salway, S. M. , Higginbottom, G. , Reime, B. , Bharj, K. K. , Chowbey, P. , Foster, C. , … & O’Brien, B.
    (2011) Contributions and challenges of cross-national comparative research in migration, ethnicity and health: insights from a preliminary study of maternal health in Germany, Canada and the UK. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 514. 10.1186/1471‑2458‑11‑514
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-514 [Google Scholar]
  62. Shaw, D. , & Weaver, D.
    (2014) Media agenda-setting and audience agenda-melding. In M. E. McCombs (Ed.), Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (pp.145–150). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Shearer, E.
    (2018) Social media outpaces print newspapers in the U.S. as a news source. Retrieved fromhttps://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/12/10/social-media-outpaces-print-newspapers-in-the-u-s-as-a-news-source/
  64. Shearer, E. , & Matsa, K. E.
    (2018) News use across social media platforms 2018. Retrieved fromhttps://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/
  65. Su, Y. , & Borah, P.
    (2019) Who is the agenda setter? Examining the intermedia agenda-setting effect between Twitter and newspapers. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(3), 236–249. 10.1080/19331681.2019.1641451
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1641451 [Google Scholar]
  66. Su, Y. , & Hu, J.
    (2020) A territorial dispute or an agenda war? A cross-national investigation of the network agenda-setting (NAS) model. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(4), 357–375. 10.1080/19331681.2020.1756553
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1756553 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sweetser, K. D. , Golan, G. J. , & Wanta, W.
    (2008) Intermedia agenda setting in television, advertising, and blogs during the 2004 election. Mass Communication & Society, 11(2), 197–216. 10.1080/15205430701590267
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701590267 [Google Scholar]
  68. Valenzuela, S. , Puente, S. , & Flores, P. M.
    (2017) Comparing disaster news on Twitter and television: An Intermedia agenda setting perspective. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(4), 615–637. 10.1080/08838151.2017.1344673
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1344673 [Google Scholar]
  69. Vargo, C. , Gangadharbatla, H. , & Hopp, T.
    (2019) eWOM across channels: comparing the impact of self-enhancement, positivity bias and vengeance on Facebook and Twitter. International Journal of Advertising, 38(8), 1153–1172. 10.1080/02650487.2019.1593720
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1593720 [Google Scholar]
  70. Vargo, C. J. , & Guo, L.
    (2017) Networks, big data, and intermedia agenda setting: An analysis of traditional, partisan, and emerging online US news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1031–1055. 10.1177/1077699016679976
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679976 [Google Scholar]
  71. Vargo, C. J. , Guo, L. , Mccombs, M. , & Shaw, D. L.
    (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 296–316. 10.1111/jcom.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12089 [Google Scholar]
  72. Vliegenthart, R. , & Walgrave, S.
    (2008) The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: A longitudinal study in Belgium. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(4), 860–877. 10.1177/107769900808500409
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500409 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wanta, W. , & Ghanem, S.
    (2007) Effects of agenda-setting. In J. Bryant & R. Carveth (Eds.), Meta-analyses of media effects. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Wanta, W. , & Foote, J.
    (1994) The president-news media relationship: A time series analysis of agenda-setting. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38(4), 437–448. 10.1080/08838159409364277
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159409364277 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wiegand, K. E. , & Paletz, D. L.
    (2001) The Elite Media and the Military-Civilian Culture Gap. Armed Forces & Society, 27(2), 183–204. 10.1177/0095327X0102700202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X0102700202 [Google Scholar]
  76. Williams, J. R.
    (2019) The use of online social networking sites to nurture and cultivate bonding social capital: A systematic review of the literature from 1997 to 2018. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2710–2729. 10.1177/1461444819858749
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858749 [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhao, D. , & Strotmann, A.
    (2015) Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services, 7(1), 1–207. 10.2200/S00624ED1V01Y201501ICR039
    https://doi.org/10.2200/S00624ED1V01Y201501ICR039 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/asj.20001.su
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/asj.20001.su
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error