Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Albright, J.
    (2016) The #Election2016 Macro-Propaganda Machine?Taken fromhttps://medium.com/@d1gi/the-election2016-macro-propaganda-machine-
  2. Barthes, R.
    (1972) Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Business Insider
  4. Chin, J., & Abkowitz, A.
    (2016) Twitter goes on defensive about China head’s background. The Wall Street Journal, April20. Taken from: www.wsj.com/articles/twitter-heads-past-ties-to-military-speak-concern-1461146188
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chou, S.
    (2016) The most widely shared election news? Nasty, brutish and short…and About Donald Trump. MIT Media Lab. Taken from: https://medium.com/mit-media-lab/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chun, R. S.
    (2018) Visual rhetoric of the presidency: An analysis of the Trump and Obama White House messaging in their first 100 days in Flicky images. Journal of Visual Literacy, 37 (1): 18–39. 10.1080/1051144X.2018.1450129
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2018.1450129 [Google Scholar]
  7. Coleman, R., & Banning, S.
    (2006) Network TV news’ affective framing of the presidential candidates: Evidence for a second-level agenda-setting effect through visual framing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83: 313–328. 10.1177/107769900608300206
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300206 [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards, J. L.
    (2012) Visual literacy and visual politics: Photojournalism and the 2004 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly, 60: 681–697. 10.1080/01463373.2012.725000
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.725000 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekman, P. and W. V. Friesen
    (1975) Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fahmy, S., Bock, M. A., & Wanta, W.
    (2014) Visual Communication Theory and Research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137362155
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137362155 [Google Scholar]
  11. Geise, S., & Baden, C.
    (2015) Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25: 46–69. 10.1111/comt.12048
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12048 [Google Scholar]
  12. Golan, G. J., & Himelboim, I.
    (2016) Can World System Theory predict news flow on twitter? The case of government-sponsored broadcasting. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1150–1170. 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1106572
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1106572 [Google Scholar]
  13. Grabe, M. E., & Bucy, E. P.
    (2009) Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372076.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372076.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Guo, L., and Vargo, J.
    (2017) Global media agenda-setting: A big data analysis of international news flow. Journal of Communication, 67: 499–520. 10.1111/jcom.12311
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12311 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gurman, T., & Ellenberger, N.
    (2015) Reaching the global community during disasters: Findings from a content analysis of the organizational use of Twitter after the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Journal of Health Communication, 20 (6): 687–696. 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018566
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018566 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall, E.
    (1976) Beyond Culture. New York, NY: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Harrison, C.
    (2003) “Visual Social Semiotics: Understanding How Still Images Make Meaning.” Technical Communication50(1): 46–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hofstede, G.
    (1993) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1), 132–134. 10.2307/2393257
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2393257 [Google Scholar]
  19. Howard, P. N., Kollanyi, B., Bradshaw, S., Neudert, L-M.
    (2017) Social media, news and political information during the U.S. election: Was polarizing content concentrated in swing states?The Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, September28. Taken from: lmneudertcomprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2017/09/Polarizing-Content-and-Swing-States.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Isaac, M., & Ember, S.
    (2016) For election day influence, Twitter ruled social media. The New York Times, November8, B3.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jang, M., & Park, Y. J.
    (2017) Redirecting the focus of the agenda: Testing the zero-sum dynamics of media attention in news and user-generated media. Journal of International Communication11: 3998–4017.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jensen, K. B.
    (1991) “Reception Analysis: Mass Communication as the Social Production of Meaning.” InK. Jensen and N. Jankowski (eds.), A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. London: Routledge, pp.135–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kiousis, S., Kim, J. Y., Ragas, M.
    (2015) Exploring new frontiers of agenda building during the 2012 US presidential election pre-convention period. Journalism Studies, 16(3): 363–382. 10.1080/1461670X.2014.906930
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.906930 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kobré, K.
    (1999) Editing for Intimacy Visual Communication Quarterly6(2): 18–19. 10.1080/15551399909363406
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15551399909363406 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kottasova, I.
    (2016) A third of pro-Trump tweets are generated by bots. CNN.com, October18. Taken from: money.cnn.com/2016/10/18/technology/twitter-bots-donald-trump-hillary-clinton/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, N. Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, J.
    (2015) Tweeting public affairs or personal affairs? Journalists’ tweets, interactivity, and ideology. Journalism, 17(7), 845–864. 10.1177/1464884915585954
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915585954 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lewis, S. C., Zamith, R., & Hermida, A.
    (2013) Content analysis in the era of Big Data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1): 34–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lynch, M.
    (2016) Fake news and the internet shell game. The New York Times, November28: A-29.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L.
    (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36: 176–187. 10.1086/267990
    https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 [Google Scholar]
  30. McIntire, M.
    (2016) How a Putin fan overseas pushed pro-Trump propaganda to Americans. The New York Times, December17. Taken from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/17/world/europe/russia-propaganda-elections.html
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Meyers-Levy, J. and L. A. Peracchio
    (1995) “Understanding the Effects of Color: How the Correspondence between Available and Required Resources Affects Attitudes.” The Journal of Consumer Research22(2): 121–138. 10.1086/209440
    https://doi.org/10.1086/209440 [Google Scholar]
  32. Miller, A., & LaPoe, V.
    (2016) Visual agenda-setting, emotion, and the BP oil disaster. Visual Communication Quarterly, 23: 53–63. 10.1080/15551393.2015.1128335
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2015.1128335 [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Boyle, J., & Pardun, C. J.
    (2021) How Twitter drives the global news agenda: Tweets from Brazil, Russia, India, China, the UK and US and online discourse about the 2016 US presidential Election. Global Media and Communication. Online at   10.1177/17427665211039970
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665211039970 [Google Scholar]
  34. Patterson, T. E.
    (2016) News coverage of the 2016 general election: How the press failed the voters. Taken from: shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election
  35. Pereira, F., & Biachi, M. M.
    (2016) Women in the 2010 Brazilian presidential elections: Two weekly magazines’ discourses on women candidates. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(4): 411–428. 10.1080/17405904.2015.1113189
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1113189 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schill, D.
    (2012) The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication, 12: 118–142. 10.1080/15358593.2011.653504
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2011.653504 [Google Scholar]
  37. Shane, S.
    (2017) The Fake Americans Russia Created to Influence the Election, The New York Times, September7. Taken from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/us/politics/russia-facebook-twitter-election.html
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Timberg, C.
    (2017) As conservative Twitter use sleeps, his account is hard at work. The Washington Post, February5. Taken fromhtts://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-a-conservative-twitter-user-sleeps-his-account-is-hard-at-work/2017/02/05/
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tunstall, J.
    (2008) The media were American. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Xiang, D.
    (2013) China’s image on international English language social media. The Journal of International Communication, 19 (2): 252–271. 10.1080/13216597.2013.833535
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2013.833535 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error