Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, A.
    (2009) Media, politics and climate change: Towards a new research agenda. Sociology compass3 (2): 166–182. 10.1111/j.1751‑9020.2008.00188.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00188.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Bar-Yam, Y.
    (2002) General features of complex systems. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK1.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Balmas, M., & Sheafer, T.
    (2010) Candidate image in election campaigns: Attribute agenda setting, affective priming, and voting intentions. International journal of public opinion research22 (2): 204–229. 10.1093/ijpor/edq009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq009 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumgartner, F. R., Green-Pedersen, C. & Jones, B. D.
    (2006) Comparative studies of policy agendas. Journal of European Public Policy13 (7): 959–974. 10.1080/13501760600923805
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600923805 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D.
    (2009) Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2015) The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D. & Wilkerson, J.
    (2011) Comparative studies of policy dynamics. Comparative Political Studies44 (8): 947–972. 10.1177/0010414011405160
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011405160 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L.
    (2001) Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. The Journal of Politics63.41191–1213. 10.1111/0022‑3816.00106
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00106 [Google Scholar]
  9. Belchior, A. M.
    (2020) Media, public opinion and parliamentary agendas’ effect in political parties’ agenda-setting. The Agenda Setting Journal4 (1): 17–42. 10.1075/asj.19008.bel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.19008.bel [Google Scholar]
  10. Boydstun, A. E.
    (2013) Making the news: Politics, the media, and agenda setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226065601.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226065601.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Boydstun, A. E., Hardy, A. & Walgrave, S.
    (2014) Two faces of media attention: Media storm versus non-storm coverage. Political Communication31 (4): 509–531. 10.1080/10584609.2013.875967
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.875967 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cavari, A., & Freedman, G.
    (2019) From public to publics: Assessing group variation in issue priorities in the United States and Israel. Comparative Policy Agendas: Theory, Tools, Data, eds.Baumgartner, F. R., Breunig, C. & Grossman, E.Oxford, UK: Oxford. 10.1093/oso/9780198835332.003.0026
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198835332.003.0026 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D.
    (1971) The politics of agenda-building: An alternative perspective for modern democratic theory. The Journal of Politics33 (4): 892–915. 10.2307/2128415
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2128415 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohen, B. C.
    (1963) The press and foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cuestas, J. C., Freille, S., & O’Gorman, P.
    (2009) The media and public agendas: Testing for media effects in Argentina during 2003–2008. Revista de Economía y Estadística67 (1): 100. 10.2139/ssrn.1714034
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1714034 [Google Scholar]
  16. de Azevedo Almeida, L., & Corrêa Gomes, R.
    (2020) MAIP: model to identify actors’ influence and its effects on the complex environmental policy decision-making process. Environmental Science & Policy112: 69–78. 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.016 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dearing, J. W. & Rogers, E.
    (1996) Agenda-setting. Vol.6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Denham, B.
    (2010) Toward conceptual consistency in studies of agenda-building processes: A scholarly review. Review of Communication10 (4): 306–323. 10.1080/15358593.2010.502593
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2010.502593 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dunwoody, S.
    (2007) The challenge of trying to make a difference using media messages. InCreating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L., eds.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 89–104. 10.1017/CBO9780511535871.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535871.008 [Google Scholar]
  20. Edwards, G. C., & Wood, D. B.
    (1999) Who fnfluences whom? The president, congress, and the media. The American Political Science Review, vol.93, no.2, pp.327–344. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/2585399
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Eissler, R. & Russell, A.
    (2016) The policy agendas project in American governance. eds.Schechter, S., Vontz, T. S., Birkland, T. A., Graber, M. A., & Patrick, J. J.Vol.4. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Reference USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Eissler, R., Russell, A., & Jones, B. D.
    (2014) New avenues for the study of agenda setting. Policy Studies Journal42: S71–S86. 10.1111/psj.12048
    https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12048 [Google Scholar]
  23. Feezell, J. T.
    (2018) Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly71 (2): 482–494. 10.1177/1065912917744895
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917744895 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ghanem, S.
    (1997) Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory: 3–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gilbert, S., Eyal, C., McCombs, M. E., & Nicholas, D.
    (1980) The state of the union address and press agenda. Journalism Quarterly57(4), 584–588. 10.1177/107769908005700405
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908005700405 [Google Scholar]
  26. Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. B.
    (2010) Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research49 (2): 257–281. 10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2009.01897.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01897.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Guo, L. & McCombs, M. E.
    (2014) Agenda-setting influence of the media in the public sphere. The Handbook of Media and Mass Communication TheoryFirst Edition. Fortner, R. S., & Fackler, P. M., eds.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Guo, L., & Vargo, C. J.
    (2017) Global intermedia agenda setting: A big data analysis of international news flow. Journal of Communication67 (4): 499–520. 10.1111/jcom.12311
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12311 [Google Scholar]
  29. Harder, R., Sevenans, J., & Van Aelst, P.
    (2017) Intermedia agenda setting in the social media age: How traditional players dominate the news agenda in election times. The International Journal of Press/Politics22 (3): 275–293. 10.1177/1940161217704969
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217704969 [Google Scholar]
  30. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R.
    (1987) News that matters: Agenda-setting and priming in a television age. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Johnson, T. J., Wanta, W., Boudreau, T., Blank-Libra, J., Schaffer, K., & Turner, S.
    (1996) Influence dealers: A path analysis model of agenda building during Richard Nixon’s war on drugs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly73(1): 181–194. 10.1177/107769909607300116
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300116 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R.
    (2005) The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2012) From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Studies Journal40 (1): 1–20. 10.1111/j.1541‑0072.2011.00431.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Jones, B. D., Thomas III, H. F., & Wolfe, M.
    (2014) Policy bubbles. Policy Studies Journal42 (1): 146–171. 10.1111/psj.12046
    https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12046 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jones, B. D., Sulkin, T., & Larsen, H. A.
    (2003) Policy punctuations in American political institutions. American Political Science Review: 151–169. 10.1017/S0003055403000583
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000583 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jones, B. D., & Wolfe, M.
    (2010) Public policy and the mass media: An information processing approach. Public Policy and the Mass Media. Routledge: 35–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Keele, L.
    (2015) The statistics of causal inference: A view from political methodology. Political Analysis23.3: 313–335. 10.1093/pan/mpv007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpv007 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kingdon, J. W.
    (1995) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd.New York: Harper Collins College Publisher.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (1984) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Vol.45. Boston: Little, Brown.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lang, G. E. & Lang, K.
    (1983) The battle for public opinion: The president, the press, and the polls during Watergate. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lau, R. R., Rogers, K., & Love, J.
    (2020) Media effects in the viewer’s choice era: Testing revised agenda-Setting and priming hypotheses, political communication. Political Communication: 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lippmann, W.
    (1922) Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lohmann, S.
    (1994) The dynamics of informational cascades: The Monday demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91. World Politics47:42. 10.2307/2950679
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2950679 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lopez-Escobar, E., Llamas, J. P., McCombs, M. E., & Lennon, F. R.
    (1998) Two levels of agenda setting among advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish elections. Political Communication15 (2): 225–238. 10.1080/10584609809342367
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609809342367 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mayhew, D. R.
    (1974) Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven: Yale university.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. McCombs, M. E.
    (2004) Setting the agendas: mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L.
    (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public opinion quarterly36 (2): 176–187. 10.1086/267990
    https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 [Google Scholar]
  48. (1976) Structuring the “unseen environment”. Journal of Communication26(2): 18–22. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1976.tb01374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01374.x [Google Scholar]
  49. McCombs, M. E., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Llamas, J. P.
    (2000) Setting the agenda of attributes in the 1996 Spanish general election. Journal of communication50 (2): 77–92. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2000.tb02842.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02842.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Melek, G., & Ulucay, D. M.
    (2019) Media Attributes and Attitude Change: Experiments on the Impact of Second-Level Agenda-Setting on Attitudes towards Syrian Refugees. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico25 (1): 381–393. 10.5209/ESMP.63735
    https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.63735 [Google Scholar]
  51. Meraz, S.
    (2011) Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & mass communication quarterly88(1): 176–194. 10.1177/107769901108800110
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800110 [Google Scholar]
  52. Nygaard, S.
    (2020) Boundary work: Intermedia agenda-setting between right-wing alternative media and professional journalism. Journalism Studies, 1–17. 10.1080/1461670X.2020.1722731
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1722731 [Google Scholar]
  53. Protess, D. L., & McCombs, M. E.
    eds. (1991) Agenda setting: readings on media public opinion, and policymaking. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Reese, S. D., & Danielian, L. H.
    (1989) A closer look at intermedia influences on agenda setting: The cocaine issue of 1986. Communication campaigns about drugs: Government, media, and the public: 47–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Russell, A., Dwidar, M., & Jones, B. D.
    (2016) The mass media and the policy process. InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.240
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.240 [Google Scholar]
  56. Russell, A.
    (2020) Senate representation on Twitter: National policy reputations for constituent communication. Social Science Quarterly, 102: 301–323. 10.1111/ssqu.12904
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12904 [Google Scholar]
  57. Russell Newman, W., Guggenheim, L., Mo Jang, S. & Bae, S. Y.
    (2014) The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication64 (2): 193–214. 10.1111/jcom.12088
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12088 [Google Scholar]
  58. Russell, A.
    (2018) The politics of prioritization: Senators’ attention in 140 characters. The Forum16(2):331–356. 10.1515/for‑2018‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2018-0020 [Google Scholar]
  59. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H.
    (1993) Policy change and learning. Boulder: Westview.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Schattschneider, E. E.
    (1950) Toward a more responsible two-party system. American Political Science Review44.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Sevenans, J.
    (2018) How mass media attract political elites’ attention. European Journal of Political Research57 (1): 153–170. 10.1111/1475‑6765.12220
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12220 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S. & Vos, D.
    (2015) Political elites’ media responsiveness and their individual political goals: A study of national politicians in Belgium. Research & Politics2 (3). 10.1177/2053168015593307
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015593307 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S. & Epping, G. J.
    (2016) How political elites process information from the news: The cognitive mechanisms behind behavioral political agenda-setting effects. Political Communication33 (4): 605–627. 10.1080/10584609.2016.1153543
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1153543 [Google Scholar]
  64. Shapiro, M. A., & Hemphill, L.
    (2017) Politicians and the policy agenda: Does use of twitter by the U.S. congress direct New York times content?Policy & Internet9(1):109–132. 10.1002/poi3.120
    https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.120 [Google Scholar]
  65. Schickler, E.
    (2020) Causal inference and American political development: common challenges and opportunities. Public Choice185.3: 501–511. 10.1007/s11127‑019‑00690‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00690-8 [Google Scholar]
  66. Soroka, S. N.
    (2002) Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research14 (3): 264–285. 10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264 [Google Scholar]
  67. Son, Y. J., & Weaver, D.
    (2006) Another look at what moves public opinion: Media agenda setting and polls in the 2000 U.S. election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18: 174–197. 10.1093/ijpor/edh090
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh090 [Google Scholar]
  68. Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C.
    (2010) Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335354.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335354.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
  69. Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S.
    (2010) A new look at agenda-setting effects – Comparing the predictive power of overall political news consumption and specific news media consumption across different media channels and media types. Journal of Communication60 (2): 271–292. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2010.01482.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01482.x [Google Scholar]
  70. Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P.
    (2016) Political agenda setting and the mass media. InOxford research encyclopedia of politics. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.46
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.46 [Google Scholar]
  71. Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J. & Nuytemans, M.
    (2009) Issue ownership stability and change: How political parties claim and maintain issues through media appearances. Political Communication26 (2): 153–172. 10.1080/10584600902850718
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902850718 [Google Scholar]
  72. Walgrave, S., Soroka, S. & Nuytemans, M.
    (2008) The mass media’s political agenda-setting power: A longitudinal analysis of media, parliament, and government in Belgium (1993 to 2000). Comparative Political Studies41 (6): 814–836. 10.1177/0010414006299098
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006299098 [Google Scholar]
  73. Walgrave, S. & Vliegenthart, R.
    (2010) Why are policy agendas punctuated? Friction and cascading in parliament and mass media in Belgium. Journal of European Public Policy17 (8): 1147–1170. 10.1080/13501763.2010.513562
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2010.513562 [Google Scholar]
  74. Wanta, W.
    (1988) The effects of dominant photographs: An agenda-setting experiment. Journalism Quarterly65 (1): 107–111. 10.1177/107769908806500114
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908806500114 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wirth, W., Matthes, J., Schemer, C., Wettstein, M., Friemel, T.,
    (2010) Agenda building and setting in a referendum campaign: Investigating the flow of arguments among campaigners, the media, and the public. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87: 328–345. 10.1177/107769901008700207
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901008700207 [Google Scholar]
  76. Wolfe, M.
    (2012) Putting on the brakes or pressing on the gas? Media attention and the speed of policymaking. Policy Studies Journal40 (1): 109–126. 10.1111/j.1541‑0072.2011.00436.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00436.x [Google Scholar]
  77. Wolfe, M., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R.
    (2013) A failure to communicate: Agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication30 (2): 175–192. 10.1080/10584609.2012.737419
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737419 [Google Scholar]
  78. Van Aelst, P., & Vliegenthart, R.
    (2014) Studying the tango: An analysis of parliamentary questions and press coverage in the Netherlands. Journalism Studies15 (4): 392–410. 10.1080/1461670X.2013.831228
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2013.831228 [Google Scholar]
  79. Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S.
    (2008) The contingency of intermedia agenda setting: A longitudinal study in Belgium. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly85(4): 860–877. 10.1177/107769900808500409
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900808500409 [Google Scholar]
  80. (2012) The interdependency of mass media and social movements. The Sage handbook of political communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage: 387–398. 10.4135/9781446201015.n31
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201015.n31 [Google Scholar]
  81. Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Baumgartner, F. R., Bevan, S., Breunig, C., Brouard, S., Chaqués Bonafont, L.
    (2016) Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries. European Journal of Political Research55 (2): 283–301. 10.1111/1475‑6765.12134
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12134 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error