Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2452-0063
  • E-ISSN: 2452-0071
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study investigates the effects of the two leading prime ministerial candidates’ personal Facebook and Twitter accounts and the effects of exposure to the general social media and web discourse in Hebrew on voters’ agendas during Israel’s April 2019 election. All the posts that appeared on the contenders’ accounts at a point in time in each of the four pre-election campaign weeks were analyzed to identify prominent issues. Social media and web content in Hebrew were also analysed over the same period. The data was compared with 2,217 responses to questionnaires completed on the four dates. The questionnaires also surveyed voters’ political orientations and the likelihood of their following the candidates’ accounts. The results revealed a significant correlation between contenders’ and voters’ agendas. However, significant differences were identified in agendas between those respondents who followed both leading candidates, those who followed a single candidate, and those who followed neither.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M.
    (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.   10.1257/jep.31.2.211
    https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariel, Y., Malka, V., Avidar, R., & Weimann-Saks, D.
    (2017) Online agenda-setting research: Challenges and dilemmas. The Agenda-Setting Journal: Theory, Practice, Critique. 1(2), 118–136.   10.1075/asj.1.2.03ari
    https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.1.2.03ari [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B.
    (2018) Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 243–253.   10.1093/joc/jqx017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S.
    (2008) A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of communication, 58(4), 707–731.   10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2008.00410.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D.
    (1999) The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230.   10.1080/105846099198596
    https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boulianne, S.
    (2015) Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society18(5), 524–538.   10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brosius, H. B., & Weimann, G.
    (1996) Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research, 23(5), 561–580.   10.1177/009365096023005002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023005002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Camaj, L., & Weaver, D.
    (2013) Need for orientation and attribute agenda-setting during a U.S. election campaign. International Journal of Communication, 7, 22. Retrieved fromhttps://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1921
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carazo-Barrantes, C.
    (2021) Agenda setting in a social media age: Exploring new methodological approaches. The Agenda Setting Journal, 5(1), 31–55.   10.1075/asj.20006.car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.20006.car [Google Scholar]
  10. Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. M.
    (2016) First- and second-level agenda setting in the Twittersphere: An application to the Italian political debate. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 13(2), 159–174.   10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160266 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chadwick, A., & Stromer-Galley, J.
    (2016) Digital media, power, and democracy in parties and election campaigns: Party decline or party renewal?The International Journal of Press/Politics21(3), 283–293.   10.1177/1940161216646731
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216646731 [Google Scholar]
  12. Coleman, R., & Wu, H. D.
    (2021) Individual differences in affective agenda setting: A cross-sectional analysis of three U.S. presidential elections. Journalism.   10.1177/1464884921990242
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884921990242 [Google Scholar]
  13. Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D.
    (2015) The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: Searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 363–380.   10.1111/jcc4.12124
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12124 [Google Scholar]
  14. Conway-Silva, B. A., Filer, C. R., Kenski, K., & Tsetsi, E.
    (2018) Reassessing Twitter’s agenda-building power: An analysis of intermedia agenda-setting effects during the 2016 presidential primary season. Social Science Computer Review, 36(4), 469–483.   10.1177/0894439317715430
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317715430 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cowart, H.
    (2020) What to think about: The applicability of agenda-settings in a social media context. The Agenda Setting Journal, 4(2), 195–218.   10.1075/asj.19001.cow
    https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.19001.cow [Google Scholar]
  16. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M.
    (1996) Communication concepts 6: Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dubois, E., & Dutton, H. W.
    (2013) Empowering citizens of the Internet age: The role of a fifth estate. InM. Graham, and W. H. Dutton (Eds.), Society and the Internet: How information and social networks are changing our lives, 238–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunaway, J., & Stein, M. R.
    (2013) Early Voting and Campaign News Coverage. Political Communication, 30(2), 278–296.   10.1080/10584609.2012.737420
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737420 [Google Scholar]
  19. Elishar-Malka, V., Ariel, Y. & Weimann, G.
    (2020) Rethinking political communication in the digital sphere. Journal of International Communication, 26(2), 190–210.   10.1080/13216597.2020.1771397
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2020.1771397 [Google Scholar]
  20. Feezell, J. T.
    (2018) Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482–494.   10.1177/1065912917744895
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917744895 [Google Scholar]
  21. Foot, K. A., & Schneider, S. M.
    (Eds.) (2006) Web Campaigning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7186.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7186.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Freidberg, C.
    (2019) A Road Map of the Israeli Political System. The Middle East and Central Asia Research Center. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ariel.ac.il/wp/mecarc/me-assessments/a-road-map-of-the-israeli-political-system
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gerbaudo, P.
    (2012) Tweets and the streets. London, UK: Pluto Press
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P.
    (2014) Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 612–634.   10.1111/jcom.12103
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103 [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo, L., & Vargo, C.
    (2015) The power of message networks: A big-data analysis of the network agenda setting model and issue ownership. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 557–576. 10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1045300 [Google Scholar]
  26. Guo, L.
    (2017) Agenda-setting: Individual-level effects versus aggregate-level effects. InP. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner & L. Zoonen (Eds). The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects.   10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0031
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0031 [Google Scholar]
  27. Haim, M., Weimann, G., & Brosius, H. B.
    (2018) Who sets the cyber agenda? Intermedia agenda-setting online: the case of Edward Snowden’s NSA revelations. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1(2), 277–294.   10.1007/s42001‑018‑0016‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-018-0016-y [Google Scholar]
  28. Haleva-Amir, S.
    (2011) Online Israeli politics: Current state of the art. Israel Affairs, 17(3), 467–485.   10.1080/13537121.2011.584678
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2011.584678 [Google Scholar]
  29. Iyengar, S., Norpoth, H., & Hahn, K. S.
    (2004) Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells. Journal of Politics, 66(1), 157–175.   10.1046/j.1468‑2508.2004.00146.x
    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00146.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Iyengar, S., Hahn, K., Krosnick, J., & Walker, J.
    (2008) Selective exposure to campaign communication: The role of anticipated agreement and issue public membership. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 186–200.   10.1017/S0022381607080139
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080139 [Google Scholar]
  31. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R.
    (2010) News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226388601.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388601.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnson, J. T. & Perlmutter, D. D.
    (2010) Introduction: The Facebook election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 554–559.   10.1080/15205436.2010.517490
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.517490 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H.
    (1948) The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lev-On, A.
    (2011) Campaigning online: Use of the Internet by parties, candidates and voters in national and local election campaigns in Israel. Policy and Internet, 3(1), 1–28.   10.2202/1944‑2866.1045
    https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1045 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mutz, D. C.
    (2004) Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 111–126.   10.1017/S0003055402004264
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004264 [Google Scholar]
  36. Newman, N., Dutton, W. H., & Blank, G.
    (2012) Social media in the changing ecology of news: The fourth and fifth estates in Britain. International Journal of Internet Science, 7(1), 6–22.   10.2139/ssrn.1826647
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1826647 [Google Scholar]
  37. McCombs, M. E.
    (2005) A look at agenda-setting: Past, present, and future. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. 10.1080/14616700500250438
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500250438 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2014) Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L.
    (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.   10.1086/267990
    https://doi.org/10.1086/267990 [Google Scholar]
  40. McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L. & Weaver, H. D.
    (2014) New directions in agenda-setting theory and research, Mass Communication and Society, 17(6), 781–802.   10.1080/15205436.2014.964871
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.964871 [Google Scholar]
  41. McCombs, M. E., & Valenzuela, S.
    (2014) Agenda-setting theory: The frontier research questions. InK. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication [online version]. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.   10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.48
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.48 [Google Scholar]
  42. Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J.
    (2014) Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements Trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news Online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063.   10.1177/0093650212466406
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406 [Google Scholar]
  43. Möller, K.
    (2010) Sense-making and agenda construction in emerging business networks: How to direct radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3), 361–371.   10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.03.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.03.014 [Google Scholar]
  44. Muddiman, A., Stroud, N. J., & McCombs, M.
    (2014) Media fragmentation, attribute agenda setting, and political opinions about Iraq. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(2), 215–233.   10.1080/08838151.2014.906433
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.906433 [Google Scholar]
  45. Patterson, T. E., & Donsbach, W.
    (1998) News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13(4), 455–468.   10.1080/10584609.1996.9963131
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1996.9963131 [Google Scholar]
  46. Penney, J.
    (2017) Social media and citizen participation in ‘official’ and ‘unofficial’ electoral promotion: A structural analysis of the 2016 Bernie Sanders digital campaign. Journal of Communication, 67(3), 402–423.   10.1111/jcom.12300
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12300 [Google Scholar]
  47. Posegga, O., & Jungherr, A.
    (2019) Characterizing political talk on Twitter: A comparison between public agenda, media agendas, and the Twitter agenda with regard to topics and dynamics. InProceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.   10.24251/HICSS.2019.312
    https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.312 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rahim, S. A.
    (2019) What can we learn about social media influence in the Malaysian 14th General Election?Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 29(2), 264–280.   10.1075/japc.00033.rah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00033.rah [Google Scholar]
  49. Roessler, P.
    (2008) Agenda-setting, framing and priming. The SAGE handbook of public opinion research, 205–218. 10.4135/9781848607910.n20
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607910.n20 [Google Scholar]
  50. Samuel-Azran, T., Yarchi, M., & Wolfsfeld, G.
    (2015) Equalization versus normalization: Facebook and the 2013 Israeli elections. Social Media & Society, 1(2), 1–9.   10.1177/2056305115605861
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115605861 [Google Scholar]
  51. Scheufele, D. A.
    (2000) Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2), 297–316.   10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07 [Google Scholar]
  52. Shamir, J., & Shamir, M.
    (2000) The Anatomy of Public Opinion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.16134
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.16134 [Google Scholar]
  53. Shamir, M., Shamir, J., & Sheafer, T.
    (2008) The political communication of mandate elections. Political Communication, 25(1), 47–66.   10.1080/10584600701807869
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701807869 [Google Scholar]
  54. Shaw, D. L., McCombs, M., Weaver, D. H., and Hamm, B. J.
    (1999) Individuals, Groups, and Agenda Melding: A Theory of Social Dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11 (1), 2–24.   10.1093/ijpor/11.1.2
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/11.1.2 [Google Scholar]
  55. Shaw, D. L., Hamm, B. J., & Knott, D. L.
    (2000) Technological Change, Agenda Challenge and Social Melding: mass media studies and the four ages of place, class, mass and space. Journalism Studies, 1(1).   10.1080/146167000361177
    https://doi.org/10.1080/146167000361177 [Google Scholar]
  56. Shaw, D., & Weaver, D.
    (2014) Media agenda-setting and audience agenda-melding. InM. E. McCombs (Ed.), Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (pp.145–150). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sheafer, T., & Wolfsfeld, G.
    (2009) Party systems and oppositional voices in the news media: A study of the contest over political waves in the United States and Israel. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(2), 146–165.   10.1177/1940161209333089
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209333089 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sheafer, T., & Weimann, G.
    (2005) Agenda building, agenda setting, priming, individual voting intentions, and the aggregate results: An analysis of four Israeli elections. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 347–365.   10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2005.tb02676.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02676.x [Google Scholar]
  59. Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J.
    (2013) Not (yet) a new era of minimal effects: A study of agenda setting at the aggregate and individual levels. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 234–255.   10.1177/1940161212473831
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212473831 [Google Scholar]
  60. Skovsgaard, M., & Arjan, D.
    (2013) Dodging the gatekeeper? Social media in the campaign during 2011 Danish elections. Information, Media & Society, 16(5), 737–756.   10.1080/1369118X.2013.783876
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.783876 [Google Scholar]
  61. Spaeth, M.
    (2009) Presidential politics and public relations in 2008: Marshall McLuhan 2.0. Journalism Studies, 10(3), 438–443.   10.1080/14616700902987264
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700902987264 [Google Scholar]
  62. Stromer-Galley, J.
    (2014) Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.   10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199731930.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199731930.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tarai, J.
    (2019) Social media and Fiji’s 2018 national election. Pacific Journalism Review, 25(1&2), 52–64.   10.24135/pjr.v25i1and2.476
    https://doi.org/10.24135/pjr.v25i1and2.476 [Google Scholar]
  64. Towner, T. L., & Muñoz, C. L.
    (2018) Picture perfect? The role of Instagram in issue agenda setting during the 2016 presidential primary campaign. Social science computer review, 36(4), 484–499.   10.1177/0894439317728222
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317728222 [Google Scholar]
  65. Trilling, D., Tolochko, P., & Burscher, B.
    (2017) From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: How to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38–60.   10.1177/1077699016654682
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654682 [Google Scholar]
  66. Vargo, C. J.
    (2011) Twitter as public salience: An agenda-setting analysis. inAEJMC annual conference, St. Louis, MO.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L.
    (2014) Network issue agendas on Twitter during the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 296–316.   10.1111/jcom.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12089 [Google Scholar]
  68. Weaver, D., McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L.
    (2004) Agenda-setting research: Issues, attributes, and influences. InL. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp.257–282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Weimann, G. & Brosius, H. B.
    (2017) Redirecting the agenda: Agenda-setting in the online Era. The Agenda Setting Journal, 1(1), 63–102.   10.1075/asj.1.1.06wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/asj.1.1.06wei [Google Scholar]
  70. Weimann, G., & Wolfsfeld, G.
    (2002) Struggles over the electoral agenda – The elections of 1996 and 1999. In: A. Arian & M. Shamir (eds.). The elections in Israel 1999, 269–289. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Weimann-Saks, D., Ariel, Y., Malka, V., & Avidar, R.
    (2016) Trends in public and media agenda setting during the 2015 Israeli elections. Israel Affairs, 22(3), 727–742.   10.1080/13537121.2016.1174386
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2016.1174386 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wolfsfeld, G.
    (2011) Making sense of media and politics: Five principles in political communication. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203839874
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839874 [Google Scholar]
  73. Woolley, J. K., Limperos, M. A. & Oliver, M. B.
    (2010) The 2008 presidential election, 2.0: A content analysis of user-generated political Facebook groups. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 631–652.   10.1080/15205436.2010.516864
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2010.516864 [Google Scholar]
  74. Wu, H. D., & Guo, L.
    (2020) Beyond salience transmission: Linking agenda networks between media and voters. Communication Research, 47(7), 1010–1033.   10.1177/0093650217697765
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217697765 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zillmann, D., Chen, L., Knobloch, S. & Callison, C.
    (2004) Effects of lead framing on selective exposure to internet news reports. Communication Research, 31(1), 58–81.   10.1177/0093650203260201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203260201 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error