1887
Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

We analyse case marking in the Jê language family (Brazilian Amazonia) with the new completeness alignment typology proposed by Lindenbergh & Zwart (2017). In contrast with classical alignment typology, the completeness typology first determines whether all grammatical functions participate in a grammatical process (e.g. case marking) and only then determines how these grammatical functions are aligned, adding nine incomplete alignment types to the five types of classical alignment typology. Nine of the ten Jê languages are classified as split-ergative, while Panará is seen as fully ergative, making it a typologically odd language within the family. We show that applying the completeness typology to Jê languages more accurately describes the true variation in case marking patterns across the Jê language family.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00001.bar
2018-12-03
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alves, Flávia
    2004 O timbira falado pelos Canela Apaniekrá: uma contribuição aos estudos da morfossintaxe de uma língua jê. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas PhD thesis.
  2. Alves, Flávia & Spike Gildea
    2016 Reconstructing the source of nominative-absolutive alignment in two Amazonian language families. InEugenio Lujón Jóhanna Barðdal & Spike Gildea (eds.), Reconstructing grammar: cognates and directionality. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardagil-Mas, Bernat
    2018 Case and agreement in Panará. University of Groningen PhD thesis.
  4. Camargo, Nayara da Silva
    2015 Tapayuna (Jê) : aspectos morfossintáticos, históricos e sociolinguísticos. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas PhD thesis.
  5. Comrie, Bernard
    1978 Ergativity. InWinfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, Irvine
    1966 “Comparative Jê phonology.” Estudos Lingüísticos: Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada1(2). 10–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deal, Amy Rose
    2016 “Syntactic ergativity as case discrimination.” InAaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K. McCarvel & Edward J. Rubin (eds.), Proceedings from WCCFL34.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DeLancey, Scott
    2004 The blue bird of ergativity. InFrancesc Queixalós (ed.), Ergativity in Amazonia III, 1–15. Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    1972The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics v. 9). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084987 [Google Scholar]
  10. 1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
  11. Estevam, Adriana Machado
    2009 Forma nominal do verbo em xavante. InEliane Mara Silveira (ed.), Anais do SILEI, vol.1. Uberlândia: EDUFU.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2011 Morphosyntaxe du xavante. Paris: Denis Diderot University PhD thesis.
  13. Legate, Julie Anne
    2008 “Morphological and Abstract Case.” Linguistics Inquiry39(1). 55–101. 10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lindenbergh, Charlotte & Jan-Wouter Zwart
    2017 “Rethinking alignment typology.” Manuscript. ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003951.
  15. Nascimento, Márcia
    2017 Evidencialidade em kaingang. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ PhD thesis.
  16. Nonato, Rafael
    2014 Clause-chaining, switch-reference and coordination. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.
  17. Oliveira, Christiane Cunha de
    2005 The language of the Apinajé people of Central Brazil. University of Oregon PhD thesis.
  18. Polinsky, M.
    2014 “Syntactic ergativity.” In. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2 edition.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Queixalós, Francesc
    2013L’ergativité est-elle un oiseau bleu?Vol.26 (LSLT). Munich: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rodrigues, Aryon
    1999 Macro-Jê. InRobert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian languages. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Salanova, Andrés
    2007 Nominalizations and aspect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.
  22. 2017 Ergativity in Jê languages. InJessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Ergativity. To appear. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. dos Santos, Ludoviko Carnasciali
    1997 Descrição de aspectos morfossintáticos da língua suyá/kĩsêdjê, família jê. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina PhD thesis.
  24. Sousa Filho, Sinval Martins de
    2007 Aspectos morfossintáticos da língua akwe-xerente. Universidade Federal de Goiás PhD thesis.
  25. Urban, Greg
    1985 “Ergativity and accusativity in Shokleng (Gê).” International Journal of American Linguistics (16). 164–187. 10.1086/465865
    https://doi.org/10.1086/465865 [Google Scholar]
  26. Wiesemann, Ursula
    1986 The pronoun systems of some Jê and Macro Jê languages. InUrsula Wiesemann (ed.), Pronominal systems, 359–380. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00001.bar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00001.bar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): alignment , case marking , Jê languages , syntax and typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error