1887
Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article takes as its point of departure Neijt’s (1979) claim that gapping is a rule of syntax with properties also found in -movement constructions. I will refine this proposal by concluding that gapping remnants are A′-moved into the clause-initial position (SpecCP) and/or the specifiers of functional projections such as TopP, FocP and NegP found in the middle field of the clause. I will further show that this approach sheds new light on various problems (such as the distribution of modal and polarity particles) not satisfactorily solved in earlier analyses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00002.bro
2018-12-03
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aelbrecht, Lobke
    2007 A movement account of Dutch gapping. (paper presented at theannual meeting of the Linguistic Society of the Netherlands, 3 February, Utrecht).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbiers, Sjef
    2002 Remnant stranding and the theory of movement. Dimensions of movement. From features to remnantsed. byA. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, S. Barbiers and H. -M. Gärtner, 47–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.48.04bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.48.04bar [Google Scholar]
  3. Boone, Enrico
    2014The syntax and licensing of gapping and fragments. PhD thesis, Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Broekhuis, Hans & Josef Bayer
    . In prep. Sluicing and gapping: ellipsis or selective spell-out?. Ms. Meertens Institute/Universität Konstanz. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/004186
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver
    2016Syntax of Dutch. Verbs and verb phrases, volume3. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_614910
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_614910 [Google Scholar]
  6. . To appear. Syntax of Dutch. Coordination. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Broekhuis, Hans & Wim Klooster
    2010 Merge and Move as costly operations. Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem8 (special issue on Optimality Theoretic Syntaxed. byG. de Avila Othero & S. de Moura Menuzzi) :155–182. www.revel.inf.br/en/edicoes/?id=19
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Corver, Norbert
    1990 “The syntax of left branch extractions.” PhD diss., University of Tilburg.
  9. Cremers, Crit
    1993 “On parsing coordination categorially.” PhD diss., University of Leiden.
  10. De Vries, Gertud
    1992 “On coordination and ellipsis.” PhD diss., University of Tilburg.
  11. Dik, Simon C.
    1968Coordination: its implications for the theory of general linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haegeman, Liliane
    1995The syntax of negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519727
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519727 [Google Scholar]
  13. Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij, and Maarten C. van den Toorn
    1997Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst, 2nd, revised edition. Groningen: Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hankamer, Jorge
    1971Constraints on deletion in syntax, Yale University: PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1973 Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry4:17–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson, Kyle
    2017 “Gapping”. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edition, ed. byM. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, 1745–1783. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom046
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom046 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kraak, Albert & Wim Klooster
    1972Syntaxis, 2nd edition. Culemborg: Stam/Robijns.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Merchant, Jason
    2001The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2004 Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy27:661–738. 10.1007/s10988‑005‑7378‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3 [Google Scholar]
  20. Neijt, Anneke
    1979 “Gapping. A contribution to sentence grammar.” PhD diss., University of Utrecht.
  21. Ott, Dennis & Volker Struckmeier
    2018 Particles and deletion. Linguistic Inquiry49:393–407. 10.1162/LING_a_00277
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00277 [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Bart, Peter, Johan Kerstens & Arie Sturm
    1998Grammatica van het Nederlands. Een inleiding. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.5117/9789053562819
    https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053562819 [Google Scholar]
  23. Van der Heijden, Emmeke & Maarten Klein
    1995 Rekenkundige voegwoorden: de ‘logica’ van samentrekkingen. De Nieuwe Taalgids88:22–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Oirsouw, Robert S.
    1987The syntax of coordination. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zwart, Jan-Wouter
    1993 “Dutch syntax. A minimalist approach” PhD diss., University of Groningen.
  26. Zwarts, Frans
    1978 “Extractie uit prepositionele woordgroepen in het Nederlands” Proeven van Neerlandistiek, aangeboden aan prof. dr. Albert Sassen, ed. byA. van Berkel, W. Blok, G. Brummel and T. Van der Hoek, 303–399. Groningen: Nederlands Instituut Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00002.bro
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): A′-movement , ellipsis , gapping , negation and particles
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error