Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919



An eye-tracking experiment using the Visual World Paradigm (VWP) shows that in on-line sentence processing in English the argument of an unaccusative verb reactivates late after verb offset. In contrast to previous studies, this VWP experiment establishes the exact time course of this effect, which matches the time course previously found for Dutch, despite differences in word order between the two languages. Furthermore, it uncovers an early reactivation of the argument of unergative verbs that has previously gone unnoticed. Such an effect has previously been observed for Dutch, but not for English. Moreover, the effect seems to occur earlier in English than in Dutch. We suggest that this difference may be due to the more rigid word order of English, which provides the parser with more informative cues.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Agnew, Zarinah K. , Hans van de Koot , Carolyn McGettigan & Sophie K. Scott
    2014 “Do sentences with unaccusative verbs involve syntactic movement? Evidence from neuroimaging.” Language, cognition and neuroscience29 (9): 1035–1045. 10.1080/23273798.2014.887125
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.887125 [Google Scholar]
  2. Altmann, Gerry T.
    1998 “Ambiguity in sentence processing.” Trends in cognitive sciences2 (4): 146–152. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(98)01153‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01153-X [Google Scholar]
  3. Altmann, Gerry T. & Yuki Kamide
    2007 “The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing.” Journal of Memory and Language57: 502–518. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Altmann, Gerry & Mark J. Steedman
    1988 “Interaction with context during human sentence processing.” Cognition30: 191–238. 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90020‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0 [Google Scholar]
  5. Burkhardt, Petra , Maria M. Pinango & Keng Wong
    2003 “The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity.” Brain and Language86: 9–22. 10.1016/S0093‑934X(02)00526‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00526-6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Burzio, Luigi
    1986Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4522‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooper, Roger. M.
    1974 “The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing.” Cognitive Psychology6: 84–107. 10.1016/0010‑0285(74)90005‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-X [Google Scholar]
  8. Crain, Stephen & Mark J. Steedman
    1985 “On not being led up the garden path: the use of context by the psychological parser.” Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectivesed. by D. Dowty , L. Karttunen and A. Zwicky , 320–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597855.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597855.011 [Google Scholar]
  9. Frazier, Lyn
    1979On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedmann, Naama
    2007 “Young children and A-chains: The acquisition of Hebrew unaccusatives.” Language Acquisition14: 377–422. 10.1080/10489220701600523
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220701600523 [Google Scholar]
  11. Friedmann, Naama , Gina Taranto , Lewis P. Shapiro , & David Swinney
    2008 “The leaf fell (the leaf): The online processing of unaccusatives.” Linguistic Inquiry39: 355–377. 10.1162/ling.2008.39.3.355
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.3.355 [Google Scholar]
  12. Huettig, Falk & Gerry T. Altmann
    2005 “Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.” Cognition96: 23–32. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kimball, John
    1973 “Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language.” Cognition, 2 (1): 15–47. 10.1016/0010‑0277(72)90028‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90028-5 [Google Scholar]
  14. Koring, Loes , Pim Mak & Eric J. Reuland
    2012 “The time course of argument reactivation revealed: Using the visual world paradigm.” Cognition123 (3): 361–379. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  15. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
    1995Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mirman, Daniel
    2014Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Chapman and Hall / CRC.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mirman, Daniel , James A. Dixon , & James S. Magnuson
    2008 “Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences.” Journal of Memory and Language59: 475–494. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  18. Momma, Shotta , L. Robert Slevc , & Colin Phillips
    2018 “Unaccusativity in sentence production.” Linguistic Inquiry49: 181–194. 10.1162/LING_a_00271
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00271 [Google Scholar]
  19. Perlmutter, David M.
    1978 “Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis.” Proceedings of the fourth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Societyed. by J. J. Jaeger , A. C. Woodbury , F. Ackerman , C. Chiarello , O. D. Gensler , J. Kingston , E. E. Sweetser , H. Thompson , & K. W. Whistler , 157–189. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Perlmutter, David M. , & Paul Postal
    1984 “The 1-advancement exclusiveness law.” Studies in relational grammar2: 81–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Perraudin, Sandrine & Pierre Mounoud
    2009 “Contribution of the priming paradigm to the understanding of the conceptual developmental shift from 5 to 9 years of age.” Developmental Science12: 956–977. 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2009.00847.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00847.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Poirier, Josée , Matthew Walenski & Lewis P. Shapiro
    2012 “The role of parallelism in the real-time processing of anaphora.” Language and cognitive processes27 (6): 868–886. 10.1080/01690965.2011.601623
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.601623 [Google Scholar]
  23. Reinhart, Tanya
    2000 “The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts.” OTS working papers in linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2002 “The theta system: An overview.” Theoretical Linguistics28: 229–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rosen, Carol
    1981 “The relational structure of reflexive clauses: Evidence from Italian.” PhD Diss., Harvard.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Shetreet, Einat , Naama Friedmann & Uri Hadar
    2010 “The Neural Correlates of Linguistic Distinctions: Unaccusative and Unergative Verbs.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience22 (10): 2306–2315. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21371
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21371 [Google Scholar]
  27. Shetreet, Einat and Naama Friedmann
    2012 “Stretched, jumped, and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives.” NeuroImage60: 1800–1806. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.081
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.081 [Google Scholar]
  28. Szekely, Anna , Thomas Jacobsen , Simona D’Amico , Antonella Devescovi , Elena Andonova , Dan Herron , et al.
    2004 “A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies.” Journal of Memory and Language51: 247–250. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Tanenhaus, Michael K. , Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton , Kathleen M. Eberhard & Julie C. Sedivy
    1995 “Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.” Science268: 1632–1634. 10.1126/science.7777863
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7777863 [Google Scholar]
  30. Yee, Eiling & Julie C. Sedivy
    2006 “Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition32: 1–14. 10.1037/0278‑7393.32.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.1 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error