Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919



Although the Dutch verb spelling system seems very straightforward, many spelling errors are made, both by children and adults (e.g., Sandra, Frisson, & Daems 2004). These errors mainly occur with verbs with two or more homophonous forms in their inflectional paradigms. Ample experimental research has been carried out on this topic, but these studies hardly reflect everyday language behavior. In the current corpus study, we reassessed previously found experimental results, but now in a Twitter corpus containing 17,432 tweets with homophonous verb forms. In accordance with previous results, we found a clear preference for the suffix - compared to both - and , as well as a frequency effect, resulting in fewer errors for more frequent word forms. Furthermore, the results revealed that users with more followers make fewer errors, and that more errors are made during the evening and night.

Available under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Assink, Egbert M. H.
    1985 “Assessing spelling strategies for the orthography of Dutch verbs.” British Journal of Psychology76 (3): 353–363. 10.1111/j.2044‑8295.1985.tb01958.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01958.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. Harald , Ton Dijkstra & Robert Schreuder
    1997 “Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model.” Journal of Memory and Language37 (1): 94–117. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2509 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. Harald , Richard Piepenbrock & Hedderick van Rijn
    1995 “The CELEX database.” Nijmegen: Center for Lexical Information, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, CD-ROM.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bosman, Anna M. T.
    2005 “Development of rule-based verb spelling in Dutch students.” Written Language & Literacy8 (1): 1–18. 10.1075/wll.8.1.01bos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.8.1.01bos [Google Scholar]
  5. Ernestus, Mirjam & Willem M. Mak
    2005 “Analogical effects in reading Dutch verb forms.” Memory & Cognition33 (7): 1160–1173. 10.3758/BF03193220
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193220 [Google Scholar]
  6. Fayol, Michel , Pierre Largy & Patrick Lemaire
    1994 “Cognitive overload and orthographic errors: When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. A study in French written language.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A47 (2): 437–464. 10.1080/14640749408401119
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749408401119 [Google Scholar]
  7. Folkard, Simon
    1975 “Diurnal variation in logical reasoning.” British Journal of Psychology66 (1): 1–8. 10.1111/j.2044‑8295.1975.tb01433.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01433.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Frisson, Steven , & Dominiek Sandra
    2002 “Homophonic forms of regularly inflected verbs have their own orthographic representations: A developmental perspective on spelling errors.” Brain and Language81 (1–3): 545–554. 10.1006/brln.2001.2546
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2546 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanssen, Esther , Robert Schreuder & Anneke Neijt
    2015 “From t-bias to d-bias in Dutch: Evidence from children’s spelling and pronunciation.” Written Language & Literacy18 (1): 104–120. 10.1075/wll.18.1.05han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.18.1.05han [Google Scholar]
  10. Hutto, C. J. , Sarita Yardi , & Eric Gilbert
    2013 A longitudinal study of follow predictors on twitter. Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems, 821–830). ACM. (comp.social.gatech.edu/papers/follow_chi13_final.pdf). 10.1145/2470654.2470771
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470771 [Google Scholar]
  11. Largy, Pierre , & Michel Fayol
    1996 “The homophone effect in written French: The case of verb-noun inflection errors.” Language and Cognitive Processes11 (3): 217–256. 10.1080/016909696387178
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696387178 [Google Scholar]
  12. Laudanna, Alessandro & Cristina Burani
    1985 “Address mechanisms to decomposed lexical entries.” Linguistics23 (5): 775–792. 10.1515/ling.1985.23.5.
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1985.23.5. [Google Scholar]
  13. Neijt, Anneke & Robert Schreuder
    2007 “Asymmetrical phoneme-grapheme mapping of coronal plosives in Dutch.” Written Language & Literacy10 (2): 219–234. 10.1075/wll.10.2.04nei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.10.2.04nei [Google Scholar]
  14. Sandra, Dominiek
    2010 “Homophone dominance at the whole-word and sub-word levels: Spelling errors suggest full-form storage of regularly inflected verb forms.” Language and Speech53 (3): 405–444. 10.1177/0023830910371459
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910371459 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sandra, Dominiek , & Michel Fayol
    2003 “Spelling errors with a view on the mental lexicon: Frequency and proximity effects in misspelling homophonous regular verb forms in Dutch and French.” Morphological structure in language processinged. by R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder , 485–514. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110910186.485
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110910186.485 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sandra, Dominiek , Steven Frisson & Frans Daems
    1999 “Why simple verb forms can be so difficult to spell: The influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch.” Brain and Language68 (1–2): 277–283. 10.1006/brln.1999.2108
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2108 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2004 “Still errors after all those years…: Limited attentional resources and homophone frequency account for spelling errors on silent verb suffixes in Dutch.” Written Language & Literacy7 (1): 61–77. 10.1075/wll.7.1.07san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.7.1.07san [Google Scholar]
  18. Sandra, Dominiek , & Lien van Abbenyen
    2009 “Frequency and analogical effects in the spelling of full-form and sublexical homophonous patterns by 12 year-old children.” The Mental Lexicon4 (2): 239–275. 10.1075/ml.4.2.04san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.4.2.04san [Google Scholar]
  19. Tjong Kim Sang, Erik & Antal van den Bosch
    2013 “Dealing with big data: The case of Twitter.” Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal3: 121–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. van der Veer, Neil , Steven Boekee & Oscar Peters
    2017 “Nationale Social Media Onderzoek 2017 [National Social Media Research 2017].” Accessed27 March 2018. https://www.vonkfactor13.nl/wp-content/uploads/Newcom-Nationale-Social-Media-Onderzoek-2017.pdf.
  21. Verhaert, Nina
    2016 “Rules Or Regularities? The Homophone Dominance Effect in Spelling and Reading Regular Dutch Verb Forms.” PhD diss., Universiteit Antwerpen.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Verhaert, Nina , Ellen Danckaert & Dominiek Sandra
    2016 “The dual role of homophone dominance. Why homophone intrusions on regular verb forms so often go unnoticed.” The Mental Lexicon11 (1): 1–25. 10.1075/ml.11.1.01ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.11.1.01ver [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error