1887
Volume 35, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

-doubling constructions closely resemble periphrastic perfect tense constructions but have an additional, seemingly superfluous form of the verb . Whilst these constructions are only found in a small number of modern Dutch dialects, they appear much more broadly in historical varieties of Dutch. In this article, I present new data from a corpus study of -doubling constructions in Early Modern Dutch (ca. 1500-1700) which reveals both similarities and an important difference with the modern dialectal phenomenon. I argue that there are two structurally distinct types of -doubling in this older period: one which contains a canonical adjective (i.e. with one internal argument) and one with a non-canonical adjective with a P layer (Koeneman et al. 2011). I further show that this sheds new light on the observed link between doubling constructions and the rise of the periphrastic perfect tenses, with implications for the nature of this syntactic development.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00011.wal
2018-12-03
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barbiers, Sjef, Johan van der Auwera, Hans J. Bennis, Eefje Boef, Gunther De Vogelaer & Margreet van der Ham
    2008aSyntactic atlas of the Dutch dialects, volume2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbiers, Sjef, Olaf N. C. J. Koeneman & Marika Lekakou
    2008b “Perfect doubling.” (talk presented at theTIN-dag, 2 February, Utrecht).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbiers, Sjef & Hans J. Bennis
    2010 “De plaats van het werkwoord in zuid en noord.” Voor Magda. Artikelen voor Magda Devos bij haar afscheid van de Universiteit Gented. byJ. de Caluwe and J. van Keymeulen, 25–42. Gent: Dirksland.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bonger, Hendrik
    1978Leven en werk van D. V. Coornhert. Amsterdam: G. A. van Oorschot.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Broekhuis, Hans & Leonie Cornips
    1994 “Undative constructions.” Linguistics32 (2): 173–189. 10.1515/ling.1994.32.2.173
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1994.32.2.173 [Google Scholar]
  6. Broekhuis, Hans
    2017 “The rise of the periphrastic perfect tense in the continental West Germanic languages.” LingBuzz, December 2017, ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003206.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Burridge, Kate
    1993Syntactic change in Germanic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.89
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.89 [Google Scholar]
  8. Coornhert, Dirck V.
    eds. 1630aVande predestinatie, verkiesinghe en de verwerpinghe Godes. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz. Colom.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1630b “Van de toelatinge ende decrete Godts.” D.V. Coornhert, wercken, deel II. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz. Colom.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1630c “Vre-reden, of onderwijs tot eendracht, vrede ende liefde, in dese tyden hoogh-noodigh.” D.V. Coornhert, wercken, deel III. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz. Colom.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coornhert, Dirck V.
    1631 “Oorsaken ende middelen vander menschen saligheyt ende verdoemenisse.” D.V. Coornhert, wercken, deel I. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz. Colom.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Coornhert, Dirck V.
    eds. 1632Waarachtighe aflaat van zonden. Amsterdam: Jacob Aertsz. Colom.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Den Dikken, Marcel
    2012 “Ditransitieven en het nut van hiërarchische structuur en derivatie.” Nederlandse Taalkunde17 (3): 362–379. 10.5117/NEDTAA2012.3.DISC541
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2012.3.DISC541 [Google Scholar]
  14. Duinhoven, Antonius M.
    1997Middel-Nederlandse syntaxis: synchroon en diachroon 2. De werkwoordgroep. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. van der Horst, Joop M.
    2008Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kern, Johan H.
    1912De met het participium praeteriti omschreven werkwoordsvormen in ’t Nederlands. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Koeneman, Olaf N. C. J., Marika Lekakou & Sjef Barbiers
    2011 “Perfect doubling.” Linguistic Variation11 (1): 35–75. 10.1075/lv.11.1.02koe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.11.1.02koe [Google Scholar]
  18. Kratzer, Angelika
    1994 “The event argument and the semantics of voice”. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  19. Kroch, Anthony S.
    2000 “Syntactic change.” The handbook of contemporary syntactic theoryed. byM. Baltin and C. Collins, 629–739. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. van der Wal, Maria J.
    1986Passiefproblemen in oudere taalfasen. Leiden: ICG Printing.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00011.wal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00011.wal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Dutch , have-doubling , participles , periphrastic perfect tenses and syntactic change
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error