Volume 36, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Andrews, Kristin
    2016 “Animal cognition”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition) ed. by E. N. Zalta , Stanford University: Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/cognition-animal/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barsalou, Lawrence W.
    2008 “Grounded cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology59:617–645. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blommaert, Jan & Ad Backus
    2011 “Repertoires revisited: ‘Knowing language’ in superdiversity”. Working Papers in Urban Languages and Literacies. Paper67.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall
    2016 “Embodied sociolinguistics”. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debatesed. by N. Coupland , 173–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cederholm, Erika Andersson , Björck, Amelie , Jennbert Kristina & Ann-Sofie Lönngren
    2014 “Editors’ introduction.” Exploring the Animal Turn. Human-Animal Relations in Science, Society and Cultureed. by E. Cederholm , B. Andersson , J. K. Amelie & A. Lönngren , 5–12. Lund: The Pufendorf Institute for Advanced Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chomsky, Noam
    2002On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613876
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613876 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cornips, Leonie
    2018 “Interspecies communication: The greeting of the dairy cow(s).” Talk presented at the Workshop Language and Human Sociality in the Making , December 3, University of Copenhagen.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cornips, Leonie & Karen P. Corrigan
    2005 “Toward an integrated approach to syntactic variation: A retrospective and prospective synopsis.” Syntax and Variation. Reconciling the Biological with the Socialed. by L. Cornips & K. Corrigan , 1–27. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.265.01cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.265.01cor [Google Scholar]
  9. Cornips, Leonie & Frans Gregersen
    2016 “The impact of Labov’s contribution to general linguistic theory”. Journal of Sociolinguistics20(4):498–524. 10.1111/josl.12197
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12197 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornips, Leonie & Cecilia Poletto
    2005 “On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques. PART I.” Lingua115(7):939–957. 10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2003.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Waal, Frans B. M. & Pier Francesco Ferrari
    2010 “Towards a bottom-up perspective on animal and human cognition.” Trends in Cognitive Science14(5):201–207. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  12. D’Mello, Sidney & Stan Franklin
    2011 “A cognitive model’s view of animal cognition.” Current Zoology57(4):499–513. 10.1093/czoolo/57.4.499
    https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/57.4.499 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitch, W. Tecumseh
    2017 “What would Lenneberg think? Biolinguistics in the third millennium.” Biolinguistics11:445–461.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Francione, Gary L. & Anna E. Charlton
    2017 “Animal rights.” The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studiesed. by L. Kalof , 25–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kendon, Adam
    2017 “Pragmatic functions of gestures. Some observations on the history of their study and their nature.” Gesture16(2):157–175. 10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken [Google Scholar]
  16. Labov, William
    1994Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford/Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2001Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social Factors. Oxford/Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Meijer, Eva R.
    2017 Political Animal Voices. Unpubl. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  19. Müller, Cornelia , Jana Bressem & Silva Ladewig
    2013 “Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: a multimodal approach.” Body – Language – Communicationed. by C. F. Müller , S. Ladewig & M. Tessendorf , 733–754. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Muysken, Pieter
    1999Talen. De Toren van Babel [Languages. The Tower of Babel]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pennycook, Alastair
    2018Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pinker, Steven & Ray Jackendoff
    2005 “The faculty of language: What’s special about it?” Cognition95(2):201–236. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Tannen, Deborah
    2004 “Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction37(4):399–420. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Tomasello, Michael
    1999The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric & Stephen J. Cowley
    2013 “Human thinking beyond the brain.” Cognition Beyond the Brain Computation, Interactivity and Human Artificeed. by S. J. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau , 1–12. Springer-Verlag: London. 10.1007/978‑1‑4471‑5125‑8_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_1 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error