1887
Volume 36, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Historical linguistics in the Netherlands, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/avt.00022.sij-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00022.sij
2019-11-05
2020-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakker, Dirk Miente & Geert Dibbets
    1977Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse taalkunde. Den Bosch: Malmberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
    2009Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
  3. Coupé, Griet
    2014Syntactic Extension: The Historical Development of Dutch Verb Clusters. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Coussé, Evie
    2008 Motivaties voor volgordevariatie. Een diachrone studie van werkwoordsvolgorde in het Nederlands, PhD Thesis, University of Gent.
  5. Damgaard, Peter de Barros, Rui Martiniano, Jack Kamm, J. Victor Moreno-Mayar, Guus Kroonen
    e.a. 2018 “The first horse herders and the impact of early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia”. Science Magazine360.1422 (science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6396/eaar7711).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Elspaß, S.
    2005Sprachgeschichte von unten. Untersuchungen zum geschriebenen Alltagsdeutsch im 19. Jahrhundert. Tubingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110910568
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110910568 [Google Scholar]
  7. Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche
    (eds.) 2007Germanic Language Histories ‘From Below’(1700–2000). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110925463
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110925463 [Google Scholar]
  8. Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline
    2005The Development of Dutch Connectives: Change and Acquisition as Windows on Form-Function Relations. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre
    (eds) 2012The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118257227
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hickey, Raymond
    (ed.) 2013The Handbook of Language Contact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Horst, Joop van der
    2008Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. Leuven: University Press Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hüning, Matthias
    1999Woordensmederij: de geschiedenis van het suffix – erij. Den Haag: Hilland Academic Graphics.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jenset, Gard B. & Barbara McGillivray
    2017Quantitative Historical Linguistics. A Corpus Framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kusters, Wouter
    2003Linguistic Complexity. The Influence of Social Change on Verbal Inflection. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Roberts, Seán & James Winters
    2012 “Social structure and language structure: the new nomothetic approach”. Psychology of Language and Communicationvol.16, 2, 89–111. 10.2478/v10057‑012‑0008‑6
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0008-6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke Van der Wal
    2014Letters as Loot. A Sociolinguistic Approach to Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Dutch. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Rutten, Gijsbert, Rik Vosters & Wim Vandenbussche
    (eds) 2014Norms and Usage in Language History 1600–1900. A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schoonenboom, Judith
    2000 Analyse, norm en gebruik als factoren van taalverandering in het Nederlands onzijdig relativum. Dissertatie, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
  19. Sijs, Nicoline van der
    2004Taal als mensenwerk: Het ontstaan van het ABN. Den Haag: SDU.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. . To appear. “Historische taalkunde en digital humanities: naar een mooie toekomst”. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Thomason, Sarah G.
    2001Language Contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman
    1988Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Trudgill, Peter
    2012Sociolinguistic Typology. Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Coetsem, Frans
    2000A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Van de Velde, Freek
    2009 De nominale constituent, PhD thesis, Leuven.
  26. 2017 “Understanding grammar at the community level requires a diachronic perspective. Evidence from four case studies”. Nederlandse Taalkunde22:1.47–74. 10.5117/NEDTAA2017.1.VELD
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2017.1.VELD [Google Scholar]
  27. Whitt, Richard J.
    (ed.) 2018Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.85
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.85 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00022.sij
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error