oa Changes in argument structure

References

1. Den Boon, Ton & Ruud Hendrickx
   2015 Van Dale Groot Woordenboek van de Nederlandse Taal. Fifteenth, revised edn.Utrecht/Antwerpen: Van Dale.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Broekhuis, Hans , Norbert Corver & Riet Vos
   2015 Syntax of Dutch: Verb and Verb Phrases, Volume1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.5117/9789089647306
   https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089647306 [Google Scholar]
3. Comrie, Bernard
   1989 Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Denison, David
   2017 “Ambiguity and Vagueness in Historical Change”. The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectivesed. by M. Hundt , S. Mollin and S. Pfenninger , 292–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316091746.013
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091746.013 [Google Scholar]
5. De Smet, Hendrik & Olga Fischer
   2017 “The Role of Analogy in Language Change: Supporting Constructions”. The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectivesed. by M. Hundt , S. Mollin and S. Pfenninger , 240–268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316091746.011
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091746.011 [Google Scholar]
6. Dreschler, Gea
   2015 Passives and the Loss of Verb Second: A Study of Syntactic and Information-Structural Factors. Utrecht: LOT.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Haeseryn, Walter , Kirsten Romijn , Guido Geerts , Jaap de Rooij , and Maarten C. van den Toorn
   2002 Elektronische Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. ans.ruhosting.nl/e-ans (1April 2019).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hawkins, John A.
   1986 A Comparative Typology of English and German. London: Croom Helm.
   [Google Scholar]
9. van der Horst, Joop & Kees van der Horst
   1999 Geschiedenis van het Nederlands in de twintigste eeuw. Den Haag: Sdu.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hundt, Marianne
    2007 English Mediopassive Constructions: A Cognitive, Corpus-based Study of their Origin, Spread and Current Status. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401203784
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203784 [Google Scholar]
11. Keyser, Jay & Thomas Roeper
    1984 On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry15, 381–416.
    [Google Scholar]
12. König, Ekkehard
    1994 “English”. The Germanic Languagesed. by E. König and J. van der Auwera , 532–565. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Levin, Beth
    1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Los, Bettelou & Gea Dreschler
    2012 “The loss of local anchoring: From adverbial local anchors to permissive subjects.” The Oxford Handbook of the History of Englished. by T. Nevalainen & E. Traugott , 859–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mårdh, Ingrid
    1980 Headlinese: On the Grammar of English Front Page Headlines. Lund, Sweden: Liberläromedel/Gleerup.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Oostdijk, Nelleke , Martin Reynaert , Véronique Hoste & Ineke Schuurman
    2013 “The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch.” Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programmeed. By P. Spyns and J. Odijk , 219–247. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑30910‑6_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30910-6_13 [Google Scholar]
17. Rohdenburg, Günter
    1974 Sekundäre Subjektivierungen im Englischen und Deutschen: Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Verb- und Adjektivsyntax. Bielefeld: Cornelson-Velhagen and Klasing.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Saeed, John I.
    2016 Semantics, 4th edn.Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]