oa The Perfect in dialogue

References

1. Atsuko, Nishiyama, and Jean-Pierre Koenig
   2010 “What Is a Perfect State?” Language86 (3): 611–46. 10.1353/lan.2010.0014
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0014 [Google Scholar]
2. Boogaart, Ronny
   1999 Aspect and temporal ordering: A constrastive analysis of Dutch and English. LOT.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Clement, Marjoline
   1997 Josepha Mendels, taal en tijd. PhD diss., Amsterdam University (UvA).
4. Dahl, Östen, and Viveka Velupillai
   2013 “The Perfect.” InThe World Atlas of Language Structures Online, edited byMatthew Dryer and Martin Haspelmath. https://wals.info/chapter/68
   [Google Scholar]
5. Friedrich, Annemarie & Damyana Gateva
   2017 “Classification of telicity using cross-linguistic annotation projection.” Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2559–2565, Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/D17‑1271
   https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D17-1271 [Google Scholar]
6. Haeseryn, Walter
   1997 Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hwa, Rebecca, Philip Resnik, Amy Weinberg & Okan Kolak
   2002 “Evaluating translational correspondence using annotation projection.” Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, 392–399. Association for Computational Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Van Der Klis, Martijn, Bert Le Bruyn & Henriëtte De Swart
   . To appear. “De la sémantique des temps verbaux à la traductologie: une comparaison multilingue de L’Étranger de Camus.” InLinguistic approaches to Tense, Aspect, Modality, Evidentiality, based on the Novel L’Etranger (“The Stranger”) by Albert Camus, and its Translations edited by Eric Corre Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Onrust, Margreet, Arie Verhagen & Rob Doeve
   1993 Formuleren. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum. 10.1007/978‑90‑313‑9474‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-9474-6 [Google Scholar]
10. Portner, Paul
    2003 “The (Temporal) Semantics and (Modal) Pragmatics of the Perfect.” Linguistics and Philosophy26 (4): 459–510. 10.1023/A:1024697112760
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024697112760 [Google Scholar]
11. Schaden, Gerhard
    2009 “Present Perfects Compete.” Linguistics and Philosophy32 (2): 115–41. 10.1007/s10988‑009‑9056‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-009-9056-3 [Google Scholar]
12. Swart, Henriëtte de
    2007 “A Cross-Linguistic Discourse Analysis of the Perfect.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (12): 2273–2307. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.006 [Google Scholar]
13. Verhagen, Arie & Saskia Daalder
    1993 Dutch Tenses and the Analysis of a Literary Text. De val. The low countries and beyonded. byR. S. Kirsner, 139–150. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Yarowsky, David, Grace Ngai & Richard Wicentowski
    2001 “Inducing multilingual text analysis tools via robust projection across aligned corpora.” Proceedings of the first international conference on Human language technology research, 109–116. Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/1072133.1072187
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1072133.1072187 [Google Scholar]