oa Collective preferences in Dutch revealed by a covered-box experiment

References

1. Akaike, Hirotugu
   1974 “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19(6): 716–723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 [Google Scholar]
2. Baayen, R. Harald, Douglas J. Davidson & Douglas Bates
   2008 “Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items.” Journal of Memory and Language59(4): 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
3. Brooks, Patricia J. & Martin D. S. Braine
   1996 “What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each?” Cognition60(3): 235–268. 10.1016/0010‑0277(96)00712‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00712-3 [Google Scholar]
4. Champollion, Lucas
   2017 Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. Vol.66, Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198755128.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755128.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
5. Dotlačil, Jakub
   2010 “Anaphora and distributivity. A study of same, different, reciprocals and others.” PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
6. Frazier, Lyn, Jeremy Patch & Keith Rayner
   1999 “Taking on semantic commitments, II: collective versus distributive readings.” Cognition70(1): 87–104. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00002‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00002-5 [Google Scholar]
7. Grice, Herbert. P.
   1975 “Logic and conversation.” InSyntax and semantics. Volume 3: Speech acts, ed. byP. Cole & J. J. Morgan. 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Huang, Yi Ting, Elizabeth Spelke & Jesse Snedeker
   2013 “What exactly do numbers mean?” Language Learning and Development9(2): 105–129. 10.1080/15475441.2012.658731
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2012.658731 [Google Scholar]
9. Katsos, Napoleon & Dorothy V. M. Bishop
   2011 “Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature.” Cognition120(1): 67–81. 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.015
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.015 [Google Scholar]
10. de Koster, Anna M. B., Jakub Dotlačil & Jennifer K. Spenader
    2017 “Children’s understanding of distributivity and adjectives of comparison.” InProceedings of the 41st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development1: 373–386.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Landman, F.
    2000 Events and plurality: The Jerusalem lectures, vol.76. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Pub.10: 978–94. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑4359‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4359-2
12. Musolino, Julien
    2009 “The logical syntax of number words: Theory, acquisition and processing.” Cognition111(1): 24–45. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.008 [Google Scholar]
13. Padilla-Reyes, Ramon E.
    2018 “Connections among scales, plurality, and intensionality in Spanish”. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
14. Pagliarini, Elana, Gaetano Fiorin & Jakub Dotlačil
    2012 “The acquisition of distributivity in pluralities.” InProceedings of the 36st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development2: 387–399.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Schwarz, Florian, Cory Bill & Jacopo Romoli
    2016 “Reluctant acceptance of the literal truth: Eye tracking in the covered box paradigm.” InProceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung20: 61–78.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Syrett, Kristen & Julien Musolino
    2013 “Collectivity, distributivity, and the interpretation of plural numerical expressions in child and adult language.” Language Acquisition20(4): 259–291. 10.1080/10489223.2013.828060
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2013.828060 [Google Scholar]
17. Van Tiel, Bob, Emiel Van Miltenburg, Natalia Zevakhina & Bart Geurts
    2016 “Scalar diversity.” Journal of Semantics33(1): 137–175.
    [Google Scholar]