1887
Volume 37, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The association between sentential negation and tense has solid foundations in the literature. It has even been argued that sentential negative markers consist of a Tense feature (De Clercq 20182020). This paper adduces the first results from a typological study and data from Bambara in support of this claim. In addition, the Bambara data also point to the morphological realisation of present or default tense, to a hierarchy for tense and to a position for sentential negation in that hierarchy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00038.cle
2020-10-27
2020-11-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, Mark
    1985 “The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation.” Linguistic Inquiry16: 373–415.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baunaz, Lena, Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman & Eric Lander
    eds. 2018Exploring Nano-syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190876746.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190876746.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Caha, Pavel
    2009 “The nanosyntax of case.” PhD diss., University of Tromsø, Tromsø.
  5. Caha, Pavel, Karen De Clercq & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
    2019 “The fine structure of the comparative.” Studia Linguistica73(3): 470–521. 10.1111/stul.12107
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12107 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chomsky, Noam
    2001 “Derivation by phase.” Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. byMichael Kenstowicz. 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chumbow, Beban S. & Pius N. Tamanji
    1994 “Bafut.” Typological studies in negation, ed. byPeter Kahrel & René Van den Berg. 211–236. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.29.11chu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.29.11chu [Google Scholar]
  8. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Clercq, Karen
    2018 “Syncretisms and the morphosyntax of negation.” Exploring Nano-syntax, ed. byLena Baunaz, Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman & Eric Lander. 180–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2020The Morphosyntax of Negative Markers. A Nanosyntactic Account. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501513756
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501513756 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dryer, Matthew
    2011 “Negative morphemes.” The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. byMatthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. URLwals.info/chapter/112
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dumestre, Gérard
    2003Grammaire fondamentale du bambara. Paris: Karthala.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ermisch, Sonja
  14. Haegeman, Liliane
    1995The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519727
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519727 [Google Scholar]
  15. Horn, Laurence
    2001A Natural History of Negation. 2nd edn.Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Miestamo, Matti
    2005Standard Negation. The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Payne, John
    1985 “Negation.” Language typology and syntactic description. Clause structure, ed. byTimothy Shopen. 197–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Prokhorov, Kirill
    2014 “Focalization particles in bambara.” Mandenkan. Bulletin semestriel d’études linguistiques mandé (52): 60–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ramchand, Gillian
    2004 “Two types of negation in Bengali.” Clause Structure in South Asian Languages, ed. byVeneeta Dayal & Anoop Mahayan. 39–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑2719‑2_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2719-2_2 [Google Scholar]
  20. Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky
    1985 “Speech act distinctions in grammar.” Language Typology and Syntactic Description I: Clause Structure, ed. byTimothy Shopen. vol.1, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Starke, Michal
    2009 “Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language.” Nordlyd36: 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2011 “Towards an elegant solution to language variation: Variation reduces to the size of lexically stored trees.” Ms., Tromsø University.
  23. Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido, Michal Starke, Karen De Clercq & Pavel Caha
    2020 “How to be positive.” Glossa5(1): 23. 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zanuttini, Raffaella
    1991 “Syntactic properties of sentential negation: A comparative study of Romance languages.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.
  25. 1996 “On the relevance of tense for sentential negation.” Parameters and Functional Heads, ed. byAdriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 181–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1997Negation and Clausal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00038.cle
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00038.cle
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bambara , nanosyntax , negation , tam and typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error