1887
Volume 37, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Conditional clauses in Dutch can occur in sentence-initial and sentence-final position. For sentence-initial conditionals, a number of syntactic integration patterns are available. This corpus study investigates to what extent clause order and syntactic integration are associated with text mode (spoken, written) and register (formal, informal). Sentence-initial position of the conditional clause is shown to be most frequent in both modes and registers, although sentence-final position is more frequent than one would expect based on the literature, especially in written texts. The distribution of syntactic integration patterns shows a clear difference between modes, as full integration of the conditional clause into the main clause is most frequent in written texts, whereas the use of the resumptive element (‘then’) is most frequent in spoken texts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00041.reu
2020-10-27
2020-11-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agresti, Alan
    2007An introduction to categorical data analysis (Second edition). New York: John Wiley and Sons. 10.1002/0470114754
    https://doi.org/10.1002/0470114754 [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, Peter
    2000 “Pre- and post-positioning of wenn-clauses in spoken and written German.” Topics in English Linguistics33(15): 173–204. 10.1515/9783110219043.2.173
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.2.173 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beekhuizen, Barend
    2016 “De zijnsstatus van de afhankelijke V1-constructie in het Nederlands.” Nederlandse Taalkunde21(1): 33–59. 10.5117/NEDTAA2016.1.BEEK
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2016.1.BEEK [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, Douglas
    1995Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
    2009Genre, register and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boogaart, Ronny
    2007 “Conditionele constructies met moest(en) en mocht(en) in Belgisch-Nederlands en Nederlands-Nederlands.” Neerlandistiek.nl7(5).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boogaart, Ronny & Kim Verheij
    2013 “Als dát geen insubordinatie is! De pragmatiek van zelfstandige conditionele zinnen.” Honderd jaar taalwetenschap. Artikelen aangeboden aan Saskia Daalder bij haar afscheid van de Vrije Universiteited. byT. A. J. M. Janssen & J. Noordegraaf. 13–28. Amsterdam: St. Neerlandistiek VU & Münster, Nodus Publikationen.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carter-Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet
    2008 “If-conditionals in medical discourse: From theory to disciplinary practice.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes7(3): 191–205. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  10. Comrie, Bernard
    1986 “Conditionals: A typology.” On Conditionalsed. byE. C. Traugott, A. Ter Meulen, J. Snitzer Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson. 77–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.005 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dancygier, Barbara
    1998Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge, and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
    1997 “Then in conditional constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics8(2): 109–136. 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.2.109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.2.109 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2000 “Constructions with if, since, and because: Causality, epistemic stance, and clause order.” Topics in English Linguistics33: 111–142. 10.1515/9783110219043.2.111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.2.111 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2005Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486760
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486760 [Google Scholar]
  15. Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed
    2001Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110851748
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851748 [Google Scholar]
  16. Diessel, Holger
    2005 “Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses.” Linguistics43(3): 449–470. 10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.449
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.449 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2013 “Adverbial subordination.” The Bloomsbury companion to syntaxed. byS. Luraghi & C. Parodi. 41–354. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans, Nicholas
    2007 “Insubordination and its uses.” Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundationsed. byI. Nikolaeva. 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferguson, Gibson
    2001 “‘If you pop over there’: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse.” English for Specific Purposes20(1): 61–82. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00027‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00027-7 [Google Scholar]
  20. Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles & Zoë Field
    2012Discovering statistics using R.London: Thousand Oaks.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ford, Cecilia. E.
    1993Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554278 [Google Scholar]
  22. 1997 “Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation.” On conditionals agained. byA. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven. 387–413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.143.21for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.21for [Google Scholar]
  23. Ford, Cecilia. E. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1986 “Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English.” On Conditionalsed. byE. C. Traugott, A. Ter Meulen, J. Snitzer Reilly & C. A. Ferguson. 353–372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.019 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gabrielatos, Costas
    2010 “A corpus-based examination of English if-conditionals through the lens of modality: Nature and types.” PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
  25. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1963 “Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements.” Universals of human languageed. byJ. H. Greenberg. 73–113. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gwet, Kilem L.
    2014Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters (Fourth edition). Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics, LLC.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Haiman, John
    1978 “Conditionals are topics.” Language54(3): 564–589. 10.1353/lan.1978.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1978.0009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Iatridou, Sabine
    1991Topics in conditionals. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1994 “On the contribution of conditional then.” Natural Language Semantics2: 171–199. 10.1007/BF01256742
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01256742 [Google Scholar]
  30. Johnson-Laird, Philip N. & Byrne, Ruth M. J.
    2002 “Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference.” Psychological Review109(4): 646–678. 10.1037/0033‑295X.109.4.646
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.646 [Google Scholar]
  31. König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera
    1988 “Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals, and concessives.” Clause combining in grammar and discourseed. byJ. Haiman & S. A. Thompson. 101–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.07kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.07kon [Google Scholar]
  32. Leech, Geoffrey
    2007 “New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness.” Corpus linguistics and the webed. byM. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer. 133–149. Leiden: Brill Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401203791_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203791_009 [Google Scholar]
  33. Linde, Charlotte
    1976 “Constraints on the ordering of if-clauses.” Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society2, 280–285.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie
    2012Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Nall, Shu Pin & Timothy M. Nall
    2010 “English ‘if-clauses’: A corpus-based genre analysis of their incidence, ordering and pragmatic effects.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice7(2): 205–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Oostdijk, Nelleke
    2000 “The Spoken Dutch Corpus. Overview and first evaluation.” Proceedings of LREC-2000, Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Volume2ed. byM. Gravilidou, G. Carayannis, S. Markantanatou, S. Piperidis & G. Stainhaouer. Athens, 887–894.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Oostdijk, Nelleke, Martin Reynaert, Véronique Hoste & Ineke Schuurman
    2013 “The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch.” Essential speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programmeed. byP. Spyns & J. Odijk. 219–247. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑30910‑6_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30910-6_13 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ramsey, Violeta
    1987 “The functional distribution of preposed and postposed ‘if’ and ‘when’ clauses in written discourse.” Coherence and grounding in discourseed. byR. S. Tomlin. 383–408. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/tsl.11.17ram
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.17ram [Google Scholar]
  39. Renmans, Bram & William van Belle
    2003 “The use of the particle dan in Dutch conditional sentences.” Leuvense Bijdragen92(1): 141–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Reuneker, Alex
    2017 “Sentence-medial if-clauses in Dutch.” Nederlandse Taalkunde22(1): 137–148. 10.5117/NEDTAA2017.1.REUN
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2017.1.REUN [Google Scholar]
  41. . (forthc.). “Connecting conditionals. A bottom-up approach to categories of conditionals in Dutch.” Manuscript in preparation.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schelfaut, F.
    1982Eerste deel: De Nederlandse conditionele bijzin, ingeleid door als, wanneer of zonder voegwoord, met of zonder dan in de hoofdzin. Tweede deel: De Nederlandse concessieve bijzin, ingeleid door al, alhoewel, hoewel, ofschoon, met of zonder toch in de bijzin. Luik: Memoire.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Van der Horst, Joop
    1995Analytische taalkunde. Groningen: Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2010Met (het) oog op morgen: Opstellen over taal, taalverandering en standaardtaal. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Verbrugge, Sara & Hans Smessaert
    2011 “On the distinction between inferential and meta-inferential conditionals in Dutch.” Journal of Pragmatics43(14): 3387–3402. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  46. von Fintel, Kai
    1994 “Restrictions on quantifier domains.” PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00041.reu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00041.reu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): clause order , conditionals , corpus , Dutch and syntactic integration
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error