oa Discourse-related V1 declaratives in Dutch

References

1. Axel, Katrin & Angelika Wöllstein
   2009 “German verb-first conditionals as unintegrated clauses.” The fruits of empirical linguisticsed. bySam Featherston & Susanne Winkler. 1–35. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110216158.1
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216158.1 [Google Scholar]
2. Biezma, María
   2011 “Conditional inversion and givenness.” Proceedings of SALT 21ed. byNeil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz. 552–571. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blom, Elma & Frank Wijnen
   2013 “Optionality of finiteness: evidence for a non-overlap stage in Dutch child language.” First Language33(3): 225–245. 10.1177/0142723713487612
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723713487612 [Google Scholar]
4. Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver
   2016 Syntax of Dutch. Verbs and verb phrases. Volume3. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_614910
   https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_614910 [Google Scholar]
5. Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
   1977 “Filters and Control.” Linguistic Inquiry8(3): 425–504.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Corver, Norbert
   2016 “Exclamative relatives in vocative noun phrases.” Nederlandse Taalkunde21(3): 79–93. 10.5117/NEDTAA2016.3.CORV
   https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2016.3.CORV [Google Scholar]
7. Huang, James
   1984 “On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns.” Linguistic Inquiry15(4): 531–574.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Jansen, Frank
   1981 Syntaktische constructies in gesproken taal. Amsterdam: Huis aan de Drie Grachten.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kampen, Jacqueline van
   1992 “Underspecification of functional features.” Paper presented at theBUCLD, October 23–25.
10. Kampen, Jacqueline van
    1997 “First steps in wh-movement.” PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
11. Kampen, Jacqueline van
    2010 “Anaforische middelen voor topicverschuiving.” Nederlandse Taalkunde15(2/3): 189–210. 10.5117/NEDTAA2010.2.DISC442
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2010.2.DISC442 [Google Scholar]
12. Koeneman, Olaf
    2000 “The flexible nature of verb movement.” PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
13. Los, Bettelou & Ans van Kemenade
    2018 “Syntax and the morphology of deixis: the loss of demonstratives and paratactic clause linking.” Atypical demonstratives: Syntax, semantics and pragmaticsed. byMarco Coniglio. 127–158. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110560299‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110560299-005 [Google Scholar]
14. Mazeland, Harrie
    2016 “The positionally sensitive workings of the Dutch particle nou.” A family of discourse markers across the languages of Europe and beyonded. byPeter Auer & Yael Maschler. 377–408. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110348989‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110348989-012 [Google Scholar]
15. Neeleman, Ad, Elena Titov, Hans van de Koot & Reiko Vermeulen
    2009 “A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast.” Alternatives to cartographyed. byJeroen van Craenenbroeck. 15–51. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110217124.15
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217124.15 [Google Scholar]
16. Overdiep, Gerrit
    1937 Stilistische grammatica van het moderne Nederlandsch. Zwolle: Tjeenk-Willink.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Thrift, Erica
    2003 “Object drop in the LI acquisition of Dutch.” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
18. Zwart, Jan-Wouter
    1993 “Dutch syntax. A minimalist approach.” PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
19. Zwart, Jan-Wouter
    2005 “Verb second as a function of Merge.” The function of function words and functional categoriesed. byMarcel den Dikken & Christina Tortora. 11–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.78.03zwa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.78.03zwa [Google Scholar]