1887
Volume 37, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

A major debate in psycholinguistics concerns the representation of morphological structure in the mental lexicon. We report the results of an auditory primed lexical decision experiment in which we tested whether verbs prime their nominalizations in Dutch. We find morphological priming effects with regular nominalizations ( ‘suspend’ → ‘suspension’) as well as with irregular nominalizations ( ‘shoot’ → ‘shot’). On this basis, we claim that, despite the lack of phonological identity between stem and derivation in the case of irregular nominalizations, the morphological relation between the two forms, suffices to evoke a priming effect. However, an alternative explanation, according to which the semantic relation in combination with the phonological overlap accounts for the priming effect, cannot be excluded.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00044.lip
2020-10-27
2020-11-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Stephen R.
    1992A-Morphous Morphology, Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511586262
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586262 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. Harald
    1992 “Quantitative Aspects of Morphological Productivity.” Yearbook of Morphology, ed. byG. Booij and J. van Marle. 109–149, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. Harald & Petar Milin
    2010 “Analyzing reaction times.” International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2): 12–28. 10.21500/20112084.807
    https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker
    2015 “Fitting linear mixed effects models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1):1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beard, Robert
    1995Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: a general theory of inflection and word formation. Suny Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J.
    2000 “Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language.” Cognition, 74(2), B13–B25. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00068‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00068-2 [Google Scholar]
  7. Booij, Geert
    2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Borer, Hagit
    2017 “The Generative Word.” The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, 2nd edition, ed. byJ. McGilvray. 110–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316716694.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316716694.006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, Joan
    1995 “Regular morphology and the lexicon.” Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5): 425–455. 10.1080/01690969508407111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
  10. Crepaldi, Davide, Kathleen Rastle, Max Coltheart & Lyndsey Nickels
    2010 “‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes.” Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1): 83–99. 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Creemers, A., Goodwin Davies, A., Wilder, R. J., Tamminga, M., & Embick, D.
    2020 Opacity, transparency, and morphological priming: A study of prefixed verbs in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104055. 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104055
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104055 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Deyne, Samuel, Daniel J. Navarro, and Gert Storms, G.
    2013 “Better explanations of lexical and semantic cognition using networks derived from continued rather than single word associations.” Behavior Research Methods, 45(2):480–498. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0260‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0260-7 [Google Scholar]
  13. Frauenfelder, Uli & Robert Schreuder
    1992 “Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: The role of productivity.” Yearbook of Morphology, ed. byG. Booij and J. van Marle. 165–183, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fruchter, Joseph & Alec Marantz
    2015 “Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the full decomposition model of complex visual word recognition.” Brain and Language143: 81–96. 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.” The View from Building 20, Essays in Linguistics in honor of Sylvain Brombergered. byK. Hale & S. J. Keyser. 111–176. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Keuleers, Emanuel, Marc Brysbaert & Boris New
    2010 “SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles.” Behavior Research Methods, 42(3): 643–650. 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
    2016 “Lmer Test: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” R package.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Labbé Grunberg, Hernán
    2020 Storage and processing of Dutch morphological information: Early electrophysiological responses to lexical, morphological and syntactic information, PhD dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
  19. Lowenstamm, Jean
    2015 “Derivational Affixes as Roots.” The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntaxed. byA. Alexiadou, H. Borer & F. Schäfer. 230–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Manelis, Leon & David A. Tharp
    1977 “The Processing of Affixed Words.” Memory and Cognition5: 690–695. 10.3758/BF03197417
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197417 [Google Scholar]
  21. Marantz, Alec
    2013a “No Escape from Morphemes in Morphological Processing.” Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7): 905–916. 10.1080/01690965.2013.779385
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.779385 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013b “Locality Domains for Contextual Allomorphy across the Interfaces.” Distributed Morphology Today, Morphemes for Morris Halleed. byO. Mathushansky & M. Halle. 95–115Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262019675.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  23. Morris, Joanna & Linnaea Stockall
    2012 “Early, equivalent ERP masked priming effects for regular and irregular morphology.” Brain and Language, 123(2): 81–93. 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Norris, Dennis, and James M. McQueen
    2008 “Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition.” Psychological Review, 115(2): 357–395. 10.1037/0033‑295X.115.2.357
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357 [Google Scholar]
  25. Peirce, Jonathan W.
    2007 “Psychopy – psychophysics software in python.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1): 8–13. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pinker, Steven & Michael T. Ullmann
    2002 “The past and future of the past tense.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(11): 456–463. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(02)01990‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Seidenberg, Mark S. & Laura M. Gonnerman
    2000 “Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9): 353–361. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01515‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01515-1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Stemberger, Joseph P. & Brian MacWhinney
    1988 “Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon?” Theoretical morphology, ed. byM. Hammond and M. Noonan. 101–116. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stockall, Linnaea & Alec Marantz
    2006 “A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence.” The Mental Lexicon, 1(1): 85–123. 10.1075/ml.1.1.07sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.1.1.07sto [Google Scholar]
  30. Taft, Marcus
    2004 “Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A57: 745–765. 10.1080/02724980343000477
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477 [Google Scholar]
  31. Taft, Marcus & Kenneth I. Forster
    1975 “Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior14: 638–647. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(75)80051‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilder, R. J., Goodwin Davies, A., & Embick, D.
    2019 “Differences between morphological and repetition priming in auditory lexical decision: Implications for decompositional models.” Cortex, 116, 122–142. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.10.007 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00044.lip
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00044.lip
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): morphological processing , nominalizations , priming and stem allomorphy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error