1887
Volume 38, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Acceptability judgements of syntactic island violations are often claimed to improve by either increasing the complexity of the -filler phrase or integrating the violating sentence into a discourse. In two acceptability judgement tasks, we looked at -island violations in Dutch by varying the complexity of the filler phrase and by presenting the sentences either in isolation or with a preceding discourse. We found that neither variable had a significant effect in isolation, but that only in their combination a significant effect was observed. The same effect showed up in non-island conditions, however. This is in contrast to findings in the literature on English and French and suggests that the complexity effect in Dutch is not syntactic. We therefore conclude that -islands are strong islands in Dutch (Broekhuis & Corver 2015) and show that the contrast with English and French can be made to follow from featural Relativized Minimality (Rizzi 2017), taking into account the verb second property of Dutch.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00047.bel
2021-10-29
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph, & Harry J. Tily
    2013 “Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.” Journal of Memory and Language68 (3): 255–278. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver
    2015Syntax of Dutch: verbs and verb phrases. Volume 3. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.5117/9789089647306
    https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089647306 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomsky, Noam
    2013 “Problems of Projection.” Lingua130: 33–49. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Donkers, Jantien, Hoeks, John & Laurie Stowe
    2013 “D-Linking or set-restriction? Processing which-questions in Dutch.” Language and Cognitive Processes28 (1–2): 9–28. doi:  10.1080/01690965.2011.566343
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.566343 [Google Scholar]
  5. Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
    2009 “Relativized relatives: types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies.” Lingua119 (1): 67–88. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodall Grant
    Goodall Grant 2015 “The D-linking effect on extraction from islands and non-islands.” Frontiers in psychology5: 1493. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01493
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01493 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hofmeister, Philip & Ivan A. Sag
    2010 “Cognitive constraints and island effects.” Language86 (2): 366–415. doi:  10.1353/lan.0.0223
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0223 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kush, Dave, Lohndal, Terje & Jon Sprouse
    2019 “On the island sensitivity of topicalization in Norwegian: An experimental investigation.: Language95 (3): 393–420. doi:  10.1353/lan.2019.0051
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0051 [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per & Rune Christensen
    2017 ”lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models.” Journal of Statistical Software82 (13): 1–26. doi:  10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  10. Matuschek, Hannes, Kliegl, Reinhold, Vasishth, Shravan, Baayen, Harald & Douglas Bates
    2017 “Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models.” Journal of Memory and Language94: 305–315. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Pesetsky, David
    1987 “Wh-in-Situ: movement and unselective binding”. The Representation of (in)Definitenessed. byEric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2019R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rizzi, Luigi
    1990Relativized minimality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2017 “Comparing extractions from wh-islands and superiority effects.” Wiener Linguistische Gazette82: 253–261.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sabel, Joachim
    2002 A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands. The Linguistic Review19: 271–315. 10.1515/tlir.2002.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2002.002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sprouse, John, Matthew W. Wagers, and Colin Phillips
    2013 “Deriving competing predictions from grammatical approaches and reductionist approaches to island effects”. Experimental Syntax and Island Effectsed byJohn Sprouse, and Norbert Hornstein, 21–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139035309.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035309.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Sprouse, Jon, Caponigro, Ivano, Greco, Ciro & Carlo Cecchetto
    2016 “Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory34: 307–344. 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9286‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8 [Google Scholar]
  18. Starke, Michal
    2001 Move dissolves into merge: a theory of locality. Doctoral dissertation. University of Geneva.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Szabolcsi, Anna & Frans Zwarts
    1993 ”Weak islands and an algebraic semantics of scope taking. Natural Language Semantics1: 235–284. doi:  10.1007/BF00263545
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263545 [Google Scholar]
  20. Villata, Sandra, Rizzi, Luigi, & Julie Franck
    2016 “Intervention effects and relativized minimality: new experimental evidence from graded judgements.” Lingua179: 76–96. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  21. Zwart, Jan-Wouter
    2011The syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511977763
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977763 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00047.bel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00047.bel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): context; D-linking; filler complexity; island constraints; relativized minimality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error