1887
Volume 38, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

We investigate the discourse structure of Free Indirect Discourse passages in narratives. We argue that Free Indirect Discourse reports consist of two separate propositional discourse units: an (explicit or implicit) frame segment and a reported content. These segments are connected at the level of discourse structure by a non-veridical, subordinating discourse relation of Attribution, familiar from recent SDRT analyses of indirect discourse constructions in natural conversation (Hunter, 2016). We conducted an experiment to detect the covert presence of a subordinating frame segment based on its effects on pronoun resolution. We compared (unframed) Free Indirect Discourse with overtly framed Indirect Discourse and a non-reportative segment. We found that the first two indeed pattern alike in terms of pronoun resolution, which we take as evidence against the pragmatic context split approach of Schlenker (2004) and Eckardt (2014), and in favor of our discourse structural Attribution analysis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00048.bim
2021-10-29
2021-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrusán, Márta
    2019 “Computing Perspective Shift in Narrative.” To appear in: Maier, E. and A. Stokke (eds.) The Language of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Asher, Nicholas, & Alex Lascarides
    2003Logics of Conversation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Banfield, Ann
    1982Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bary, Corien, & Emar Maier
    2020 “The Landscape of Speech Reporting.” Ms. Nijmegen/Groningen. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/003526
  5. Christensen, R. H. B.
    2019 “Ordinal – Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R Package Version 2019.12–10.” https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal
  6. Cumming, Samuel
    2019 “Narrative and Point of View.” To appear in: Maier, E. and A. Stokke (eds.) The Language of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dancygier, B.
    2017 “Viewpoint phenomena in constructions and discourse.” Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1): 37. 10.5334/gjgl.253
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.253 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
    2016 “Discourse viewpoint as network.” Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities13: 40. 10.1515/9783110365467‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467-003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Eckardt, Regine
    2014The Semantics of Free Indirect Discourse: How Texts Allow Us to Mind-Read and Eavesdrop. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fludernik, Monika
    2003The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203451007
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451007 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hinterwimmer, Stefan
    2017 “Prominent Protagonists.” Journal of Pragmatics, 154: 79–91. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hobbs, Jerry R.
    1979 “Coherence and Coreference.” Cognitive Science3 (1): 67–90. 10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hunter, Julie
    2016 “Reports in Discourse.” Dialogue & Discourse7 (4): 1–35. 10.5087/dad.2016.401
    https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2016.401 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hunter, Julie, Nicholas Asher, Brian Reese, and Pascal Denis
    2006 “Evidentiality and Intensionality: Two Uses of Reportative Constructions in Discourse.” Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse:99–106. Maynooth: National University of Ireland.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaiser, Elsi
    2015 “Perspective-Shifting and Free Indirect Discourse: Experimental Investigations.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory25: 346–372. 10.3765/salt.v25i0.3436
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3436 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaplan, David
    1989Demonstratives. Themes from Kaplan. J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein: 481–563. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kehler, Andrew, Laura Kertz, Hannah Rohde, and Jeffrey L. Elman
    2008 “Coherence and Coreference Revisited.” Journal of Semantics25 (1): 1–44. 10.1093/jos/ffm018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffm018 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kehler, Andrew and Hannah Rohde
    2013 “A Probabilistic Reconciliation of Coherence-Driven and Centering-Driven Theories of Pronoun Interpretation.” Theoretical Linguistics39 (1–2): 1–37. 10.1515/tl‑2013‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Koev, Todor
    2013 Apposition and the Structure of Discourse. Rutgers University PhD Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Labov, William
    1972Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher
    2008 “Segmented Discourse Representation Theory: Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure.” Computing Meaning, 87–124: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑5958‑2_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5958-2_5 [Google Scholar]
  22. Maier, Emar
    2015 “Quotation and Unquotation in Free Indirect Discourse.” Mind & Language30 (3): 345–373. 10.1111/mila.12083
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12083 [Google Scholar]
  23. Miltsakaki, Eleni
    2001 “Centering in Greek.” Proceedings of The 15th International Symposium on theoretical and applied linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nikiforidou, Kiki
    2012 “The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends.” Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspectiveed. byB. Dancygier and E. Sweetser: 177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084727.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727.014 [Google Scholar]
  25. Papadopoulou, Despina, Eleni Peristeri, Evagelia Plemenou, Theodoros Marinis, and Ianthi Tsimpli
    2015 “Pronoun Ambiguity Resolution in Greek: Evidence from Monolingual Adults and Children.” Lingua155: 98–120. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  26. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2019R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Redeker, Gisela
    1996 “Free indirect discourse in newspaper reports.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996: 221–232. 10.1075/avt.13.21red
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.13.21red [Google Scholar]
  28. Sanders, José & Gisela Redeker
    1996 “Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse.” Spaces, worlds and grammared. byG. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser, 290–317. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Schlenker, Philippe
    2004 “Context of Thought and Context of Utterance: A Note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present.” Mind & Language19 (3): 279–304. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2004.00259.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00259.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharvit, Yael
    2008 “The Puzzle of Free Indirect Discourse.” Linguistics and Philosophy31 (3): 353–395. 10.1007/s10988‑008‑9039‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9039-9 [Google Scholar]
  31. Simons, Mandy
    2007 “Observations on Embedding Verbs, Evidentiality, and Presupposition.” Lingua117 (6): 1034–1056. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.006 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00048.bim
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00048.bim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): discourse structure; free indirect discourse; narrative; SDRT; speech/attitude reports
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error