1887
Volume 38, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919

Abstract

Abstract

In Dutch, posture verbs like ‘lie’ and ‘stand’ are obligatorily used in locative constructions with inanimate subjects, classifying the spatial Figure-Ground relation. Prima facie, in this use, posture verbs seem more like functional elements than like lexical verbs.

This paper investigates processing of Dutch posture verbs in a reference resolution task in the visual world paradigm, to get more clarity on the nature of these verbs. We know that lexical verbs like ‘ring’ cause anticipatory looks towards a matching target referent like ‘telephone’; and that they suppress looks to a phonological competitor like ‘telescope’. The functional property of grammatical gender on determiners ( vs. ) is less robust in directing looks. When it comes to anticipating the target referent, and suppressing looks to a phonological competitor, do posture verbs pattern with lexical verbs, or with functional elements like grammatical gender?

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00049.mul
2021-10-29
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/avt.00049.mul.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00049.mul&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Altmann, G. & Y. Kamide
    1999 “Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.” Cognition73(3): 247–264. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00059‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ameka, F. K. & S. C. Levinson
    2007 “Introduction: the typology and semantics of locative predicates, posturals, positionals and other beasts.” Linguistics45: 847–871. 10.1515/LING.2007.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2007.025 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker & S. Walker
    2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1): 1–48. doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma, P.
    2001 “Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer.” Glot International5(9): 341–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogaards, M.
    2019 “Sitting stuck and standing scribbled: Productivity, structure, and meaning of posture verbs combined with a complementive past participle in Dutch.” MA thesis, Leiden University, https://www.maartenbogaards.nl/papers/2019/bogaards_2019_mathesis.pdf
  6. 2020 “Gezichten, gedachten en gesprekken: Quotatieven in het Nederlands van nu.” Neerlandistiek: Online tijdschrift voor taal- en letterkunde, https://neerlandistiek.nl/2020/02/gezichten-gedachten-en-gesprekken/
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brouwer, S., S. Sprenger & S. Unsworth
    2017 “Processing grammatical gender in Dutch: Evidence from eye movements.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology159: 50–65, doi:  10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooper, R. M.
    1974 “The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language.” Cognitive Psychology6: 84–107. 10.1016/0010‑0285(74)90005‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-X [Google Scholar]
  9. Cozijn, R.
    2007 Fixation 0.1.0.15, software for clean-up and coding of EyeLink data.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dahan, D., D. Swingley, M. Tanenhaus & J. Magnuson
    2000 “Linguistic Gender and Spoken-Word Recognition in French.” Journal of Memory and Language42: 465–480. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2688
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2688 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dahan, D. & M. Tanenhaus
    2004 “Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition30(2): 498.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dink, J. W. & B. Ferguson
    2015 eyetrackingR: An R Library for Eye-tracking Data Analysis. Retrieved fromwww.eyetrackingr.com
  13. Hintz, F., A. S. Meyer & F. Huettig
    2017 “Predictors of verb-mediated anticipatory eye movements in the visual world.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(9): 1352.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hlavac, M.
    2018 stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. R package version 5.2.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoekstra, T. & R. Mulder
    1990 “Unergatives as copular verbs; locational and existential predication.” The linguistic review7: 1–79. 10.1515/tlir.1990.7.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1990.7.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hothorn, T., F. Bretz & P. Westfall
    2008 “Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models.” Biometrical Journal50(3): 346–363. 10.1002/bimj.200810425
    https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425 [Google Scholar]
  17. Keuleers, E., M. Brysbaert & B. New
    2010 “SUBTLEX-NL: A new frequency measure for Dutch words based on film subtitles.” Behavior Research Methods42(3): 643–650. 10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuznetsova, A., P. B. Brockhoff & R. H. B. Christensen
    2017 “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13): 1–26, doi:  10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lemmens, M.
    2002 “The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs.” Typological Studies in Language51: 103–140. 10.1075/tsl.51.07lem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.51.07lem [Google Scholar]
  20. 2005 “Aspectual posture verb constructions in Dutch.” Journal of Germanic linguistics17(3): 183–217. 10.1017/S1470542705000073
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542705000073 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lemmens, M. & J. Perrez
    2012 “A quantitative analysis of the use of posture verbs by French-speaking learners of Dutch.” CogniTextes. Revue de l’Association française de linguistique cognitive8. 10.4000/cognitextes.609
    https://doi.org/10.4000/cognitextes.609 [Google Scholar]
  22. Loerts, H., M. Wieling & M. S. Schmid
    2013 “Neuter is not common in Dutch: Eye movements reveal asymmetrical gender processing.” Journal of psycholinguistic research42(6): 551–570. 10.1007/s10936‑012‑9234‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9234-2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mani, N. & F. Huettig
    2012 “Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake – But only for skilled producers.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance38(4): 843.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mirman, D.
    2014Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mulders, I. & L. Koring
    2020 “The many ways to stand, lie and sit” (paper presented at theGrote Taaldag, 31 January, Utrecht).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Newman, J.
    ed. 2002The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying (Vol.51). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/tsl.51
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.51 [Google Scholar]
  27. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2020R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  28. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team 2020RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, www.rstudio.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tanenhaus, M., M. Spivey-Knowlton, K. Eberhard & J. Sedivy
    1995 “Integration of visual and linguistic information during spoken language comprehension.” Science268: 1632–1634, doi:  10.1126/science.7777863
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7777863 [Google Scholar]
  30. Toorn, M. C. van den
    1975 “Over de semantische kenmerken van staan, liggen en zitten.” De Nieuwe Taalgids68: 459–464.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Pottelberge, J.
    2002 “Nederlandse progressiefconstructies met werkwoorden van lichaamshouding: Specificiteit en geschiedenis.” Nederlandse Taalkunde7: 142–174.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00049.mul
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00049.mul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): eye-tracking; grammatical gender; lexicality; posture verbs; visual world paradigm
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error