Volume 38, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In certain varieties of Dutch spoken among young people, the preposition and determiner in locative and directional PPs can sometimes be omitted. We argue on the basis of language data taken from Twitter and intuitions of young speakers of Dutch that nominal arguments in these constructions do not have a DP layer, the absence of which leads to a special interpretation. The option to omit the preposition is related to the structural and semantic complexity of the verb. The bare construction is possible only with simple verbs, and not with manner-of-motion verbs. We present an analysis that accounts for the non-pronunciation of prepositions in directional predicates by claiming that they can be licensed through incorporation into the verb. This type of incorporation is blocked if the verb is structurally complex.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aguilar Guevara, Ana
    2014 Weak definites: Semantics, lexicon and pragmatics. Doctoral dissertation atUtrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cattaneo, Andrea
    2009 It is all about clitics: The case of a Norther Italian Dialect like Bellinzonese. Doctoral dissertation atNew York University.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins, Christopher
    2007 “Home sweet home.” NYU Working Papers in Linguistics: Volume 1ed. byLisa Levinson and Oana Savescu-Ciucivara (Eds).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. den Dikken, Marcel
    2010a “Directions from the get-go. On the syntax of manner-of-motion verbs in directional constructions.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics9: 23–53. 10.5565/rev/catjl.93
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.93 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2010b “On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs.” Mapping spatial PPsed. byGuglielmo Cinque and Luigi Rizzi, 74–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gehrke, Berit
    2008 Ps in motion: On the semantics and syntax of P elements and motion events. Doctoral dissertation atUtrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoekstra, Teun
    1984Transitivity: Grammatical relations in government-binding theory. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783112327241
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112327241 [Google Scholar]
  8. 1999 “Auxiliary selection in Dutch.” Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory17(1): 67–84. 10.1023/A:1006186109813
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006186109813 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoekstra, Teun & René Mulder
    1990 “Unergatives as copular verbs: Locational and existential predication.” The Linguistic Review7(1): 1–79. 10.1515/tlir.1990.7.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1990.7.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Honeycutt, Courtenay & Susan Herring
    2009 “Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration on Twitter.” Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciencesed. byRalph Sprague Jr.Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ioannidou, Alexandra & Marcel den Dikken
    2009 “P-drop, D-drop, D-spread.” Proceedings of the 2007 workshop in Greek syntax and semantics at MITed. byClair Halpert, Jeremy Hartman, and David Hill, 393–408.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jackendoff, Ray
    1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kayne, Richard
    2007 “A short note on where vs. place.” Miscellanea di Studi Linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovanied. byRoberta Maschi, Nicoletta Penello, and Piera Rizzolatti, 245–257. Udine: Forum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Koster, Jan
    1994 “Predicate incorporation and the word order of Dutch.” Paths towards universal grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayneed. byGuglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi, and Raffaella Zanuttini, 255–277. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. McIntyre, Andrew
    2004 “Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shells.” Linguistics42(3): 523–571. 10.1515/ling.2004.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.018 [Google Scholar]
  16. Myler, Neil
    2013 “On coming the pub in the North West of England: Accusative unaccusatives, dependent case, and preposition incorporation.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics16(2–3): 189–207. 10.1007/s10828‑013‑9055‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-013-9055-1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Nortier, Jacomine
    1990Dutch-Moroccan Arabic code switching among Moroccans in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110877182
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877182 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nortier, Jacomine & Bente Svendsen
    2015Language, youth and identity in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061896
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061896 [Google Scholar]
  19. Perlmutter, David
    1978 “Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 157–189. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198 [Google Scholar]
  20. Pohle, Maria & Kathleen Schumann
    2014 “Keine Angst vor Kiezdeutsch! Zum neuen Dialekt der Multikulti-Generation.” Zeitschrift für Jugendkriminalrecht und Jugendhilfe25(3): 216–224
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
    2001 “An event structure account of English resultatives.” Language77(4): 766–797. 10.1353/lan.2001.0221
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0221 [Google Scholar]
  22. van Riemsdijk, Henk
    1978A case study in syntactic markedness: The binding nature of prepositional phrases. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2002 “The unbearable lightness of going: The projection parameter as a pure parameter governing the distribution of elliptic motion verbs in Germanic.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics5(1–3): 143–196. 10.1023/A:1021251312697
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021251312697 [Google Scholar]
  24. van der Sijs, Nicoline
    2014 “‘Laat-me-er-dit-van-zeggen’: Grammaticale bijzonderheden van het Surinaams-Nederlands.” Onze Taal83(11): 314–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Stvan, Laurel
    1998 The semantics and pragmatics of bare singular noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation atNorthwestern University.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. de Swart, Henriëtte & Joost Zwarts
    2009 “Less form – more meaning: Why bare singular nouns are special.” Lingua119(2): 280–295. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  27. de Swart, Henriëtte, Yoad Winter & Joost Zwarts
    2007 “Bare nominals and reference to capacities.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory25(1): 195–222. 10.1007/s11049‑006‑9007‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9007-4 [Google Scholar]
  28. Terzi, Arhonto
    2010 “On null spatial Ps and their arguments.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics9: 167–187. 10.5565/rev/catjl.99
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.99 [Google Scholar]
  29. Tjong Kim Sang, Erik
    2011 “Het gebruik van Twitter voor taalkundig onderzoek.” TABU: Bulletin voor Taalwetenschap, 39(1–2): 62–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wiese, Heike
    2012Kiezdeutsch. Ein neuer Dialekt entsteht. München: C. H. Beck. 10.17104/9783406630354
    https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406630354 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error