1887
Volume 38, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-7332
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9919

Abstract

Abstract

Exposure to English is more extensive in today’s society than to French. In this study we investigated crosslinguistic influences from Dutch and/or English to language performances in French as a foreign language, while controlling for language proficiency in French, English and Dutch, and exposure to English.

We tested Dutch learners of French ( = 65) with respect to the acceptability of reduced relative clauses and attachment preferences in full relative clauses. The results showed crosslinguistic influence in the acceptability task and the preference task from English and Dutch respectively. Furthermore, language proficiency in English seems to affect attachment preferences in French. We concluded that these findings support the Linguistic Proximity Model (Westergaard et al. 2017) and that French in Dutch secondary education might be a third language, instead of a second language.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00056.tes
2021-10-29
2021-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/avt.00056.tes.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00056.tes&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bardel, Camilla & Ylva Falk
    2007 “The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax.” Second Language Research23 (4): 459–484. 10.1177/0267658307080557
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080557 [Google Scholar]
  2. Birdsong, David & James E. Flege
    2001 “Regular-irregular dissociations in L2 acquisition of English morphology.” Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University conference on language development: 123–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowerman, Bruce L. & Richard T. O’connell
    1990Linear statistical models: An applied approach. Brooks/Cole.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brysbaert, Marc & Don C. Mitchell
    1996 “Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A49 (3): 664–695. 10.1080/713755636
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713755636 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carrasco-Ortiz, Haydee & Cheryl Frenck-Mestre
    2014 “Phonological and orthographic cues enhance the processing of inflectional morphology. ERP evidence from L1 and L2 French.” Frontiers in Psychology5: 888. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00888
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00888 [Google Scholar]
  6. Frazier, Lyn & Charles Clifton
    1996Construal. Cambridge: Mit Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl
    2004 “Ambiguities and anomalies: What can eye-movements and event-related potentials reveal about second language sentence processing?”. Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectivesed. byJudith Kroll & Annette De Groot, 268–284. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. George, Darren & Mallery, Paul
    2003SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hermas, Abdelkader
    2010 “Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial state.” International Journal of Multilingualism7 (4): 343–362. 10.1080/14790718.2010.487941
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2010.487941 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kellerman, Eric
    1977 “Towards a characterisation of the strategy of transfer in second language learning.” Interlanguage Studies Bulletin: 58–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mulder, Gerben
    2020 “The New Statistics for applied linguistics.” Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics9 (1–2): 79–96. 10.1075/dujal.19019.mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19019.mul [Google Scholar]
  12. Rah, Anne & Dany Adone
    2010 “Processing of the reduced relative clause versus main verb ambiguity in L2 learners at different proficiency levels.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition: 79–109. 10.1017/S027226310999026X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310999026X [Google Scholar]
  13. Ranong, Sirirat Na & Yan-kit Ingrid Leung
    2009 “Null objects in L1 Thai-L2 English-L3 Chinese: An empiricist take on a theoretical problem.” Third Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar: 162–191. 10.21832/9781847691323‑011
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691323-011 [Google Scholar]
  14. Stadt, Rosalinde, Aafke Hulk & Petra Sleeman
    2016 “The influence of L2 English and immersion education on L3 French in the Netherlands.” Linguistics in the Netherlands33 (1): 152–165. 10.1075/avt.33.11sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.33.11sta [Google Scholar]
  15. 2018 “The influence of L2 English on L3 French acquisition in bilingual education.” Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics7 (2): 227–245. 10.1075/dujal.18006.sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.18006.sta [Google Scholar]
  16. Stadt, Rosalinde
    2019The influence of Dutch (L1) and English (L2) on third language learning: The effects of education, development and language combinations. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Swets, Benjamin, Timothy Desmet, Charles Clifton & Fernanda Ferreira
    2008 “Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading.” Memory & Cognition36 (1): 201–216. 10.3758/MC.36.1.201
    https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.201 [Google Scholar]
  18. Westergaard, Marit, Natalia Mitrofanova, Roksolana Mykhaylyk & Yulia Rodina
    2017 “Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model.” International Journal of Bilingualism21 (6): 666–682. 10.1177/1367006916648859
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916648859 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00056.tes
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/avt.00056.tes
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Foreign Language Education; French; L3 acquisition; Transfer
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error