oa Variation in the processing of grammatical norm violations

References

1. Audring, Jenny
   2009 Reinventing pronoun gender. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT publications.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker & Steven C. Walker
   2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software67 (1): 1–48, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
3. de Hoop, Helen
   2020 “Het verlies van een persoonlijk voornaamwoord*.” Nederlandse Taalkunde25 (2): 355–362, 10.5117/NEDTAA2020.2‑3.018.DEHO
   https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2020.2-3.018.DEHO [Google Scholar]
4. Delignette-Muller, Marie Laure & Christophe Dutang
   2015 fitdistrplus: An R Package for Fitting Distributions. Journal of Statistical Software64 (4): 1–34, https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v064i04
   [Google Scholar]
5. E-ANS
   E-ANS 2021 Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst (ANS), versie 3.1 2021, <https://e-ans.ivdnt.org/topics/pid/ans10031405lingtopic
6. Ferreira, Fernanda & John M. Henderson
   1990 “Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.” Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition16 (4): 555–568, 10.1037/0278‑7393.16.4.555
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.555 [Google Scholar]
7. Giner, Göknur & Gordon K. Smyth
   2016 statmod: Probability Calculations for the Inverse Gaussian Distribution. R Journal8 (1): 339–351, (29March 2022). 10.32614/RJ‑2016‑024
   https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-024 [Google Scholar]
8. Grondelaers, Stefan, Paul van Gent & Roeland van Hout
   2022 “On the Inevitability of Social Meaning and Ideology in Accounts of Syntactic Change: Evidence from Pronoun Competition in Netherlandic Dutch.” InExplanations in Sociosyntactic Variation, Tanya Karoli Christensen & Torben Juel Jensen. (eds), 120–143, 10.1017/9781108674942.006
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674942.006 [Google Scholar]
9. Hinskens, F. L. M. P. & H. J. Bennis
   2014 “Goed of fout. Niet-standaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands.” Nederlandse Taalkunde19 (2): 131–184, 10.5117/NEDTAA2014.2.BENN
   https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2014.2.BENN [Google Scholar]
10. Hubers, Ferdy & Helen de Hoop
    2013 “The effect of prescriptivism on comparative markers in spoken Dutch.” Linguistics in the Netherlands301: 89–101, 10.1075/avt.30.07hub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.30.07hub [Google Scholar]
11. Hubers, Ferdy, Theresa Redl, Hugo de Vos, Lukas Reinarz & Helen de Hoop
    2020b “Processing Prescriptively Incorrect Comparative Particles: Evidence From Sentence-Matching and Eye-Tracking.” Frontiers in Psychology111, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00186
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00186 [Google Scholar]
12. Hubers, Ferdy, T. M. Snijders & H. de Hoop
    2016 “How the brain processes violations of the grammatical norm: An fMRI study.” Brain and Language1631, 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.006 [Google Scholar]
13. Hubers, Ferdy, Thijs Trompenaars, Sebastian Collin, Kees de Schepper & Helen de Hoop
    2020a “Hypercorrection as a by-product of education.” Applied Linguistics41 (4): 552–574, 10.1093/applin/amz001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz001 [Google Scholar]
14. Just, M. A., P. A. Carpenter & J. D. Woolley
    1982 “Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension.” Journal of experimental psychology. General111 (2): 228–238, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6213735 10.1037/0096‑3445.111.2.228
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228 [Google Scholar]
15. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff & Rune H. B. Christensen
    2017 lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software82 (13), 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
16. Lenth, Russell v.
    2021 emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lo, Steson & Sally Andrews
    2015 “To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data.” Frontiers in Psychology61: 1171, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171 [Google Scholar]
18. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team 2008 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org/
19. Schoenmakers, Gert-Jan T.
    (accepted). “Linguistic judgments in 3D: The aesthetic quality, linguistic acceptability, and surface probability of stigmatized and non-stigmatized variation.” Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
20. van Casteren, Maaarten & Matthew H. Davis
    2006 “Mix, a program for pseudorandomization.” Behavior Research Methods38 (4): 584–589, 10.3758/BF03193889
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193889 [Google Scholar]